From: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf 0/3] s390/bpf: Fix gotol with large offsets
Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2024 20:30:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240102193531.3169422-1-iii@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
Hi,
While looking at a pyperf180 failure on s390x (must be related to [1],
I'm not done with the investigation yet) I noticed that I have
unfortunately messed up the gotol implementation. Patch 1 is the fix,
patch 2 is a small test infrastructure tweak, and patch 3 adds a
test.
[1] https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/55669
Best regards,
Ilya
Ilya Leoshkevich (3):
s390/bpf: Fix gotol with large offsets
selftests/bpf: Double the size of test_loader log
selftests/bpf: Test gotol with large offsets
arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 2 +-
.../selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_gotol.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_loader.c | 2 +-
3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--
2.43.0
next reply other threads:[~2024-01-02 19:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-02 19:30 Ilya Leoshkevich [this message]
2024-01-02 19:30 ` [PATCH bpf 1/3] s390/bpf: Fix gotol with large offsets Ilya Leoshkevich
2024-01-03 0:05 ` Yonghong Song
2024-01-03 18:42 ` John Fastabend
2024-01-02 19:30 ` [PATCH bpf 2/3] selftests/bpf: Double the size of test_loader log Ilya Leoshkevich
2024-01-03 0:41 ` Yonghong Song
2024-01-03 7:05 ` Ilya Leoshkevich
2024-01-03 18:15 ` Yonghong Song
2024-01-03 18:43 ` John Fastabend
2024-01-04 21:19 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-01-04 22:33 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-01-04 22:38 ` Yonghong Song
2024-01-02 19:30 ` [PATCH bpf 3/3] selftests/bpf: Test gotol with large offsets Ilya Leoshkevich
2024-01-03 0:44 ` Yonghong Song
2024-01-03 18:44 ` John Fastabend
2024-01-04 23:00 ` [PATCH bpf 0/3] s390/bpf: Fix " patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240102193531.3169422-1-iii@linux.ibm.com \
--to=iii@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox