From: Dmitrii Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org,
martin.lau@linux.dev, song@kernel.org, yonghong.song@linux.dev,
dan.carpenter@linaro.org, olsajiri@gmail.com, asavkov@redhat.com,
Dmitrii Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v12 2/4] selftests/bpf: Add test for recursive attachment of tracing progs
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2024 20:05:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240103190559.14750-3-9erthalion6@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240103190559.14750-1-9erthalion6@gmail.com>
Verify the fact that only one fentry prog could be attached to another
fentry, building up an attachment chain of limited size. Use existing
bpf_testmod as a start of the chain.
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Dmitrii Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com>
---
Changes in v12:
- Skip close_progs at the beginning, remove NULL checks when closing
progs, adjust comments style.
Changes in v11:
- Use subtests, reduce code duplication
Changes in v10:
- Add tests for loading tracing progs without attaching, and
detaching tracing progs.
Changes in v8:
- Cleanup test bpf progs and the content of first/second condition
in the loop.
Changes in v5:
- Test only one level of attachment
.../bpf/prog_tests/recursive_attach.c | 107 ++++++++++++++++++
.../selftests/bpf/progs/fentry_recursive.c | 16 +++
.../bpf/progs/fentry_recursive_target.c | 17 +++
3 files changed, 140 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/recursive_attach.c
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/fentry_recursive.c
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/fentry_recursive_target.c
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/recursive_attach.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/recursive_attach.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..4bd0a0e4231e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/recursive_attach.c
@@ -0,0 +1,107 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/* Copyright (c) 2023 Red Hat, Inc. */
+#include <test_progs.h>
+#include "fentry_recursive.skel.h"
+#include "fentry_recursive_target.skel.h"
+#include <bpf/btf.h>
+#include "bpf/libbpf_internal.h"
+
+/* Test recursive attachment of tracing progs with more than one nesting level
+ * is not possible. Create a chain of attachment, verify that the last prog
+ * will fail. Depending on the arguments, following cases are tested:
+ *
+ * - Recursive loading of tracing progs, without attaching (attach = false,
+ * detach = false). The chain looks like this:
+ * load target
+ * load fentry1 -> target
+ * load fentry2 -> fentry1 (fail)
+ *
+ * - Recursive attach of tracing progs (attach = true, detach = false). The
+ * chain looks like this:
+ * load target
+ * load fentry1 -> target
+ * attach fentry1 -> target
+ * load fentry2 -> fentry1 (fail)
+ *
+ * - Recursive attach and detach of tracing progs (attach = true, detach =
+ * true). This validates that attach_tracing_prog flag will be set throughout
+ * the whole lifecycle of an fentry prog, independently from whether it's
+ * detached. The chain looks like this:
+ * load target
+ * load fentry1 -> target
+ * attach fentry1 -> target
+ * detach fentry1
+ * load fentry2 -> fentry1 (fail)
+ */
+static void test_recursive_fentry_chain(bool attach, bool detach)
+{
+ struct fentry_recursive_target *target_skel = NULL;
+ struct fentry_recursive *tracing_chain[2] = {};
+ struct bpf_program *prog;
+ int prev_fd, err;
+
+ target_skel = fentry_recursive_target__open_and_load();
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(target_skel, "fentry_recursive_target__open_and_load"))
+ return;
+
+ /* Create an attachment chain with two fentry progs */
+ for (int i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
+ tracing_chain[i] = fentry_recursive__open();
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(tracing_chain[i], "fentry_recursive__open"))
+ goto close_prog;
+
+ /* The first prog in the chain is going to be attached to the target
+ * fentry program, the second one to the previous in the chain.
+ */
+ prog = tracing_chain[i]->progs.recursive_attach;
+ if (i == 0) {
+ prev_fd = bpf_program__fd(target_skel->progs.test1);
+ err = bpf_program__set_attach_target(prog, prev_fd, "test1");
+ } else {
+ prev_fd = bpf_program__fd(tracing_chain[i-1]->progs.recursive_attach);
+ err = bpf_program__set_attach_target(prog, prev_fd, "recursive_attach");
+ }
+
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_program__set_attach_target"))
+ goto close_prog;
+
+ err = fentry_recursive__load(tracing_chain[i]);
+ /* The first attach should succeed, the second fail */
+ if (i == 0) {
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "fentry_recursive__load"))
+ goto close_prog;
+
+ if (attach) {
+ err = fentry_recursive__attach(tracing_chain[i]);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "fentry_recursive__attach"))
+ goto close_prog;
+ }
+
+ if (detach) {
+ /* Flag attach_tracing_prog should still be set, preventing
+ * attachment of the following prog.
+ */
+ fentry_recursive__detach(tracing_chain[i]);
+ }
+ } else {
+ if (!ASSERT_ERR(err, "fentry_recursive__load"))
+ goto close_prog;
+ }
+ }
+
+close_prog:
+ fentry_recursive_target__destroy(target_skel);
+ for (int i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
+ fentry_recursive__destroy(tracing_chain[i]);
+ }
+}
+
+void test_recursive_fentry(void)
+{
+ if (test__start_subtest("attach"))
+ test_recursive_fentry_chain(true, false);
+ if (test__start_subtest("load"))
+ test_recursive_fentry_chain(false, false);
+ if (test__start_subtest("detach"))
+ test_recursive_fentry_chain(true, true);
+}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/fentry_recursive.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/fentry_recursive.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..b9e4d35ac597
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/fentry_recursive.c
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/* Copyright (c) 2023 Red Hat, Inc. */
+#include <linux/bpf.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
+
+/*
+ * Dummy fentry bpf prog for testing fentry attachment chains
+ */
+SEC("fentry/XXX")
+int BPF_PROG(recursive_attach, int a)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/fentry_recursive_target.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/fentry_recursive_target.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..6e0b5c716f8e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/fentry_recursive_target.c
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/* Copyright (c) 2023 Red Hat, Inc. */
+#include <linux/bpf.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
+
+/*
+ * Dummy fentry bpf prog for testing fentry attachment chains. It's going to be
+ * a start of the chain.
+ */
+SEC("fentry/bpf_testmod_fentry_test1")
+int BPF_PROG(test1, int a)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
--
2.41.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-03 19:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-03 19:05 [PATCH bpf-next v12 0/4] Relax tracing prog recursive attach rules Dmitrii Dolgov
2024-01-03 19:05 ` [PATCH bpf-next v12 1/4] bpf: " Dmitrii Dolgov
2024-01-03 19:05 ` Dmitrii Dolgov [this message]
2024-01-03 19:47 ` [PATCH bpf-next v12 2/4] selftests/bpf: Add test for recursive attachment of tracing progs Song Liu
2024-01-03 20:18 ` Dmitry Dolgov
2024-01-03 20:47 ` Song Liu
2024-01-03 20:51 ` Dmitry Dolgov
2024-01-05 4:45 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-01-03 19:05 ` [PATCH bpf-next v12 3/4] bpf: Fix re-attachment branch in bpf_tracing_prog_attach Dmitrii Dolgov
2024-01-03 19:05 ` [PATCH bpf-next v12 4/4] selftests/bpf: Test re-attachment fix for bpf_tracing_prog_attach Dmitrii Dolgov
2024-01-03 19:47 ` Song Liu
2024-01-05 4:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v12 0/4] Relax tracing prog recursive attach rules patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240103190559.14750-3-9erthalion6@gmail.com \
--to=9erthalion6@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=asavkov@redhat.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=olsajiri@gmail.com \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox