From: Leon Hwang <hffilwlqm@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org,
maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com, jakub@cloudflare.com,
iii@linux.ibm.com, hengqi.chen@gmail.com, hffilwlqm@gmail.com,
kernel-patches-bot@fb.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 1/4] bpf, x64: Use emit_nops() to replace memcpy()'ing x86_nops[5]
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2024 22:22:23 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240104142226.87869-2-hffilwlqm@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240104142226.87869-1-hffilwlqm@gmail.com>
For next commit to reuse emit_nops(), move emit_nops() before
emit_prologue().
By the way, replace all memcpy(prog, x86_nops[5], X86_PATCH_SIZE) with
emit_nops(&prog, X86_PATCH_SIZE).
Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <hffilwlqm@gmail.com>
---
arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++--------------------
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
index bdacbb84456d9..fe30b9ebb8de4 100644
--- a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -307,6 +307,25 @@ static void pop_callee_regs(u8 **pprog, bool *callee_regs_used)
*pprog = prog;
}
+static void emit_nops(u8 **pprog, int len)
+{
+ u8 *prog = *pprog;
+ int i, noplen;
+
+ while (len > 0) {
+ noplen = len;
+
+ if (noplen > ASM_NOP_MAX)
+ noplen = ASM_NOP_MAX;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < noplen; i++)
+ EMIT1(x86_nops[noplen][i]);
+ len -= noplen;
+ }
+
+ *pprog = prog;
+}
+
/*
* Emit the various CFI preambles, see asm/cfi.h and the comments about FineIBT
* in arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
@@ -385,8 +404,7 @@ static void emit_prologue(u8 **pprog, u32 stack_depth, bool ebpf_from_cbpf,
/* BPF trampoline can be made to work without these nops,
* but let's waste 5 bytes for now and optimize later
*/
- memcpy(prog, x86_nops[5], X86_PATCH_SIZE);
- prog += X86_PATCH_SIZE;
+ emit_nops(&prog, X86_PATCH_SIZE);
if (!ebpf_from_cbpf) {
if (tail_call_reachable && !is_subprog)
/* When it's the entry of the whole tailcall context,
@@ -692,8 +710,7 @@ static void emit_bpf_tail_call_direct(struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog,
if (stack_depth)
EMIT3_off32(0x48, 0x81, 0xC4, round_up(stack_depth, 8));
- memcpy(prog, x86_nops[5], X86_PATCH_SIZE);
- prog += X86_PATCH_SIZE;
+ emit_nops(&prog, X86_PATCH_SIZE);
/* out: */
ctx->tail_call_direct_label = prog - start;
@@ -1055,25 +1072,6 @@ static void detect_reg_usage(struct bpf_insn *insn, int insn_cnt,
}
}
-static void emit_nops(u8 **pprog, int len)
-{
- u8 *prog = *pprog;
- int i, noplen;
-
- while (len > 0) {
- noplen = len;
-
- if (noplen > ASM_NOP_MAX)
- noplen = ASM_NOP_MAX;
-
- for (i = 0; i < noplen; i++)
- EMIT1(x86_nops[noplen][i]);
- len -= noplen;
- }
-
- *pprog = prog;
-}
-
/* emit the 3-byte VEX prefix
*
* r: same as rex.r, extra bit for ModRM reg field
@@ -2700,8 +2698,7 @@ static int __arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im, void *rw_im
/* remember return value in a stack for bpf prog to access */
emit_stx(&prog, BPF_DW, BPF_REG_FP, BPF_REG_0, -8);
im->ip_after_call = image + (prog - (u8 *)rw_image);
- memcpy(prog, x86_nops[5], X86_PATCH_SIZE);
- prog += X86_PATCH_SIZE;
+ emit_nops(&prog, X86_PATCH_SIZE);
}
if (fmod_ret->nr_links) {
--
2.42.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-04 14:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-04 14:22 [PATCH bpf-next 0/4] bpf, x64: Fix tailcall hierarchy Leon Hwang
2024-01-04 14:22 ` Leon Hwang [this message]
2024-01-04 14:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/4] " Leon Hwang
2024-01-05 4:15 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-01-05 6:15 ` Leon Hwang
2024-01-05 17:43 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-01-06 2:38 ` Leon Hwang
2024-01-05 10:33 ` Leon Hwang
2024-01-05 17:47 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-01-06 2:33 ` Leon Hwang
2024-01-06 3:34 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-01-05 12:40 ` Jiri Olsa
2024-01-06 0:18 ` John Fastabend
2024-01-06 3:46 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-02-14 5:47 ` Leon Hwang
2024-02-14 11:25 ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2024-02-14 16:31 ` Leon Hwang
2024-02-14 23:16 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-02-15 13:16 ` Leon Hwang
2024-02-16 2:18 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-02-17 13:43 ` Leon Hwang
2024-02-20 5:13 ` Leon Hwang
2024-02-20 17:34 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-02-20 17:33 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-02-21 14:42 ` Leon Hwang
2024-01-04 14:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next 3/4] bpf, x64: Rename RESTORE_TAIL_CALL_CNT() to LOAD_TAIL_CALL_CNT_PTR() Leon Hwang
2024-01-04 14:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next 4/4] selftests/bpf: Add testcases for tailcall hierarchy fixing Leon Hwang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240104142226.87869-2-hffilwlqm@gmail.com \
--to=hffilwlqm@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=hengqi.chen@gmail.com \
--cc=iii@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jakub@cloudflare.com \
--cc=kernel-patches-bot@fb.com \
--cc=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox