From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D8B250A7C; Tue, 16 Jan 2024 19:49:28 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1705434568; cv=none; b=FlDDLeVlntVDSb/0nLyKfbGhIviAjyb5kyHUAz9AfmklzYcDl5jg9PBatzz4boPPkUqBipA2o3U3t0Xp0AwpdNeP6LZZgT+mv4+gzc3e0rgjXCC12S5qnBLLzQzIC4JnBGRVLfhv8tEB4LEAvPV1jZG7KLSeaDtfY/xYsmtYPQc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1705434568; c=relaxed/simple; bh=cppTFyF5tp/6PgVGk68fBKjFZSL7jxnFJu001UhRQWk=; h=Received:DKIM-Signature:From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID: X-Mailer:In-Reply-To:References:MIME-Version:X-stable: X-Patchwork-Hint:X-stable-base:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=MmoeFNlHN/DxYxv6g9e8QaROltUWehF/+DGF/GnjHJa224mLYGiHDO/BgJlov8ZjduOvfuhtX5EJ6xsqKk/J7HCNkVrQRQhfXgzVztGO5cahcJh4FZ3LhTM955spymA78nH7AiVjMcqZ8LbUrolPnQbKNr8flm7LjTx9iYnbffs= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=h29uViUD; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="h29uViUD" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AD1E9C433F1; Tue, 16 Jan 2024 19:49:26 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1705434568; bh=cppTFyF5tp/6PgVGk68fBKjFZSL7jxnFJu001UhRQWk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=h29uViUDnIGfHroRR7flgKCZggWaVMpujmwl/jc7QYUaTw7w+7Nt3XZoMa53ZUUJs 2yPlA++I2kQjuk9nO0NpeWfT/rmn5XQPxXE63ogoBZOsq9iqoO5zM1VxNdfMZ2ycQT NOzcSGDhN7VGh8AWLztiDT/aOJNIE2hurDTKEcheeyYjmv2WYBVBkKlMY0ZKgNXM5T L/2gci9UbLFQqegmlWCzgyewB/2lVVyULpyuVvBZDEOjqslsPRzBPsDF3UMwolifjM sqK4kzeTCtwCB3br9RLW2t/VLisihbCT0yrmGCiYpPKuTTqeYdi6u20ubMtF9HADS9 myvVx2KQYK7Dw== From: Sasha Levin To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Andrii Nakryiko , Alexei Starovoitov , Sasha Levin , daniel@iogearbox.net, shuah@kernel.org, yonghong.song@linux.dev, martin.lau@kernel.org, alan.maguire@oracle.com, lorenz.bauer@isovalent.com, iii@linux.ibm.com, bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.6 004/104] selftests/bpf: satisfy compiler by having explicit return in btf test Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2024 14:45:30 -0500 Message-ID: <20240116194908.253437-4-sashal@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.43.0 In-Reply-To: <20240116194908.253437-1-sashal@kernel.org> References: <20240116194908.253437-1-sashal@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-stable: review X-Patchwork-Hint: Ignore X-stable-base: Linux 6.6.12 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit From: Andrii Nakryiko [ Upstream commit f4c7e887324f5776eef6e6e47a90e0ac8058a7a8 ] Some compilers complain about get_pprint_mapv_size() not returning value in some code paths. Fix with explicit return. Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231102033759.2541186-3-andrii@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf.c index 4e0cdb593318..1b8e967f2604 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf.c @@ -5265,6 +5265,7 @@ static size_t get_pprint_mapv_size(enum pprint_mapv_kind_t mapv_kind) #endif assert(0); + return 0; } static void set_pprint_mapv(enum pprint_mapv_kind_t mapv_kind, -- 2.43.0