From: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
kernel-team@fb.com, Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>,
Dave Thaler <dthaler1968@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next] [docs/bpf] Improve documentation of 64-bit immediate instructions
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2024 11:46:29 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240127194629.737589-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev> (raw)
For 64-bit immediate instruction, 'BPF_IMM | BPF_DW | BPF_LD' and
src_reg=[0-6], the current documentation describes the 64-bit
immediate is constructed by
imm64 = (next_imm << 32) | imm
But actually imm64 is only used when src_reg=0. For all other
variants (src_reg != 0), 'imm' and 'next_imm' have separate special
encoding requirement and imm64 cannot be easily used to describe
instruction semantics.
This patch clarifies that 64-bit immediate instructions use
two 32-bit immediate values instead of a 64-bit immediate value,
so later describing individual 64-bit immediate instructions
becomes less confusing.
Acked-by: Dave Thaler <dthaler1968@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
---
.../bpf/standardization/instruction-set.rst | 13 ++++---------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/bpf/standardization/instruction-set.rst b/Documentation/bpf/standardization/instruction-set.rst
index af43227b6ee4..fceacca46299 100644
--- a/Documentation/bpf/standardization/instruction-set.rst
+++ b/Documentation/bpf/standardization/instruction-set.rst
@@ -166,7 +166,7 @@ Note that most instructions do not use all of the fields.
Unused fields shall be cleared to zero.
As discussed below in `64-bit immediate instructions`_, a 64-bit immediate
-instruction uses a 64-bit immediate value that is constructed as follows.
+instruction uses two 32-bit immediate values that are constructed as follows.
The 64 bits following the basic instruction contain a pseudo instruction
using the same format but with opcode, dst_reg, src_reg, and offset all set to zero,
and imm containing the high 32 bits of the immediate value.
@@ -181,13 +181,8 @@ This is depicted in the following figure::
'--------------'
pseudo instruction
-Thus the 64-bit immediate value is constructed as follows:
-
- imm64 = (next_imm << 32) | imm
-
-where 'next_imm' refers to the imm value of the pseudo instruction
-following the basic instruction. The unused bytes in the pseudo
-instruction are reserved and shall be cleared to zero.
+Here, the imm value of the pseudo instruction is called 'next_imm'. The unused
+bytes in the pseudo instruction are reserved and shall be cleared to zero.
Instruction classes
-------------------
@@ -590,7 +585,7 @@ defined further below:
========================= ====== === ========================================= =========== ==============
opcode construction opcode src pseudocode imm type dst type
========================= ====== === ========================================= =========== ==============
-BPF_IMM | BPF_DW | BPF_LD 0x18 0x0 dst = imm64 integer integer
+BPF_IMM | BPF_DW | BPF_LD 0x18 0x0 dst = (next_imm << 32) | imm integer integer
BPF_IMM | BPF_DW | BPF_LD 0x18 0x1 dst = map_by_fd(imm) map fd map
BPF_IMM | BPF_DW | BPF_LD 0x18 0x2 dst = map_val(map_by_fd(imm)) + next_imm map fd data pointer
BPF_IMM | BPF_DW | BPF_LD 0x18 0x3 dst = var_addr(imm) variable id data pointer
--
2.34.1
next reply other threads:[~2024-01-27 19:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-27 19:46 Yonghong Song [this message]
2024-01-27 20:32 ` [PATCH bpf-next] [docs/bpf] Improve documentation of 64-bit immediate instructions Yonghong Song
2024-01-29 16:00 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240127194629.737589-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev \
--to=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=dthaler1968@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).