BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
	martin.lau@kernel.org
Cc: andrii@kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: mark dynptr kfuncs __weak to make them optional on old kernels
Date: Mon,  5 Feb 2024 16:40:08 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240206004008.1541513-1-andrii@kernel.org> (raw)

Mark dynptr kfuncs as __weak to allow
verifier_global_subprogs/arg_ctx_{perf,kprobe,raw_tp} subtests to be
loadable on old kernels. Because bpf_dynptr_from_xdp() kfunc is used
from arg_tag_dynptr BPF program in progs/verifier_global_subprogs.c
*and* is not marked as __weak, loading any subtest from
verifier_global_subprogs fails on old kernels that don't have
bpf_dynptr_from_xdp() kfunc defined. Even if arg_tag_dynptr program
itself is not loaded, libbpf bails out on non-weak reference to
bpf_dynptr_from_xdp (that can't be resolved), which shared across all
programs in progs/verifier_global_subprogs.c.

So mark all dynptr-related kfuncs as __weak to unblock libbpf CI ([0]).
In the upcoming "kfunc in vmlinux.h" work we should make sure that
kfuncs are always declared __weak as well.

  [0] https://github.com/libbpf/libbpf/actions/runs/7792673215/job/21251250831?pr=776#step:4:7961

Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_kfuncs.h | 18 +++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_kfuncs.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_kfuncs.h
index 0cd4111f954c..14ebe7d9e1a3 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_kfuncs.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_kfuncs.h
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ struct bpf_sock_addr_kern;
  *  Error code
  */
 extern int bpf_dynptr_from_skb(struct __sk_buff *skb, __u64 flags,
-    struct bpf_dynptr *ptr__uninit) __ksym;
+    struct bpf_dynptr *ptr__uninit) __ksym __weak;
 
 /* Description
  *  Initializes an xdp-type dynptr
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ extern int bpf_dynptr_from_skb(struct __sk_buff *skb, __u64 flags,
  *  Error code
  */
 extern int bpf_dynptr_from_xdp(struct xdp_md *xdp, __u64 flags,
-			       struct bpf_dynptr *ptr__uninit) __ksym;
+			       struct bpf_dynptr *ptr__uninit) __ksym __weak;
 
 /* Description
  *  Obtain a read-only pointer to the dynptr's data
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ extern int bpf_dynptr_from_xdp(struct xdp_md *xdp, __u64 flags,
  *  buffer if unable to obtain a direct pointer
  */
 extern void *bpf_dynptr_slice(const struct bpf_dynptr *ptr, __u32 offset,
-			      void *buffer, __u32 buffer__szk) __ksym;
+			      void *buffer, __u32 buffer__szk) __ksym __weak;
 
 /* Description
  *  Obtain a read-write pointer to the dynptr's data
@@ -35,13 +35,13 @@ extern void *bpf_dynptr_slice(const struct bpf_dynptr *ptr, __u32 offset,
  *  buffer if unable to obtain a direct pointer
  */
 extern void *bpf_dynptr_slice_rdwr(const struct bpf_dynptr *ptr, __u32 offset,
-			      void *buffer, __u32 buffer__szk) __ksym;
+			      void *buffer, __u32 buffer__szk) __ksym __weak;
 
-extern int bpf_dynptr_adjust(const struct bpf_dynptr *ptr, __u32 start, __u32 end) __ksym;
-extern bool bpf_dynptr_is_null(const struct bpf_dynptr *ptr) __ksym;
-extern bool bpf_dynptr_is_rdonly(const struct bpf_dynptr *ptr) __ksym;
-extern __u32 bpf_dynptr_size(const struct bpf_dynptr *ptr) __ksym;
-extern int bpf_dynptr_clone(const struct bpf_dynptr *ptr, struct bpf_dynptr *clone__init) __ksym;
+extern int bpf_dynptr_adjust(const struct bpf_dynptr *ptr, __u32 start, __u32 end) __ksym __weak;
+extern bool bpf_dynptr_is_null(const struct bpf_dynptr *ptr) __ksym __weak;
+extern bool bpf_dynptr_is_rdonly(const struct bpf_dynptr *ptr) __ksym __weak;
+extern __u32 bpf_dynptr_size(const struct bpf_dynptr *ptr) __ksym __weak;
+extern int bpf_dynptr_clone(const struct bpf_dynptr *ptr, struct bpf_dynptr *clone__init) __ksym __weak;
 
 /* Description
  *  Modify the address of a AF_UNIX sockaddr.
-- 
2.34.1


             reply	other threads:[~2024-02-06  0:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-06  0:40 Andrii Nakryiko [this message]
2024-02-06  4:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: mark dynptr kfuncs __weak to make them optional on old kernels patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240206004008.1541513-1-andrii@kernel.org \
    --to=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox