From: Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev,
song@kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com, andrii@kernel.org
Cc: sinquersw@gmail.com, kuifeng@meta.com,
Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@gmail.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v4 1/3] bpf, net: validate struct_ops when updating value.
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2024 14:34:16 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240224223418.526631-2-thinker.li@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240224223418.526631-1-thinker.li@gmail.com>
Perform all validations when updating values of struct_ops maps. Doing
validation in st_ops->reg() and st_ops->update() is not necessary anymore.
However, tcp_register_congestion_control() has been called in various
places. It still needs to do validations.
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@gmail.com>
---
kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c | 11 ++++++-----
net/ipv4/tcp_cong.c | 6 +-----
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c b/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c
index a6019087b467..07e554c191d1 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c
@@ -672,13 +672,14 @@ static long bpf_struct_ops_map_update_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key,
*(unsigned long *)(udata + moff) = prog->aux->id;
}
+ if (st_ops->validate) {
+ err = st_ops->validate(kdata);
+ if (err)
+ goto reset_unlock;
+ }
+
if (st_map->map.map_flags & BPF_F_LINK) {
err = 0;
- if (st_ops->validate) {
- err = st_ops->validate(kdata);
- if (err)
- goto reset_unlock;
- }
arch_protect_bpf_trampoline(st_map->image, PAGE_SIZE);
/* Let bpf_link handle registration & unregistration.
*
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_cong.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_cong.c
index 1b34050a7538..28ffcfbeef14 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_cong.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_cong.c
@@ -146,11 +146,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tcp_unregister_congestion_control);
int tcp_update_congestion_control(struct tcp_congestion_ops *ca, struct tcp_congestion_ops *old_ca)
{
struct tcp_congestion_ops *existing;
- int ret;
-
- ret = tcp_validate_congestion_control(ca);
- if (ret)
- return ret;
+ int ret = 0;
ca->key = jhash(ca->name, sizeof(ca->name), strlen(ca->name));
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-24 22:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-24 22:34 [PATCH bpf-next v4 0/3] Allow struct_ops maps with a large number of programs Kui-Feng Lee
2024-02-24 22:34 ` Kui-Feng Lee [this message]
2024-02-24 22:34 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 2/3] bpf: struct_ops supports more than one page for trampolines Kui-Feng Lee
2024-03-04 22:34 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-02-24 22:34 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 3/3] selftests/bpf: Test struct_ops maps with a large number of program links Kui-Feng Lee
2024-03-04 22:30 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 0/3] Allow struct_ops maps with a large number of programs patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240224223418.526631-2-thinker.li@gmail.com \
--to=thinker.li@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=kuifeng@meta.com \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sinquersw@gmail.com \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox