From: Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev,
song@kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com, andrii@kernel.org
Cc: sinquersw@gmail.com, kuifeng@meta.com,
Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 2/2] selftests/bpf: Ensure libbpf skip all-zeros fields of struct_ops maps.
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 11:32:45 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240312183245.341141-3-thinker.li@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240312183245.341141-1-thinker.li@gmail.com>
A new version of a type may have additional fields that do not exist in
older versions. Previously, libbpf would reject struct_ops maps with a new
version containing extra fields when running on a machine with an old
kernel. However, we have updated libbpf to ignore these fields if their
values are all zeros or null in order to provide backward compatibility.
Signed-off-by: Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@gmail.com>
---
.../bpf/prog_tests/test_struct_ops_module.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++
.../selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_module.c | 13 +++++++
2 files changed, 48 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_struct_ops_module.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_struct_ops_module.c
index ee5372c7f2c7..e0d9ff75121b 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_struct_ops_module.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_struct_ops_module.c
@@ -93,9 +93,44 @@ static void test_struct_ops_load(void)
struct_ops_module__destroy(skel);
}
+static void test_struct_ops_not_zeroed(void)
+{
+ struct struct_ops_module *skel;
+ int err;
+
+ skel = struct_ops_module__open();
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "struct_ops_module_open"))
+ return;
+
+ bpf_program__set_autoload(skel->progs.test_3, false);
+
+ err = struct_ops_module__load(skel);
+ struct_ops_module__destroy(skel);
+
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "struct_ops_module_load"))
+ return;
+
+ skel = struct_ops_module__open();
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "struct_ops_module_open_not_zeroed"))
+ return;
+
+ bpf_program__set_autoload(skel->progs.test_3, false);
+
+ /* libbpf should reject the testmod_zeroed since the value of its
+ * "zeroed" is non-zero.
+ */
+ skel->struct_ops.testmod_zeroed->zeroed = 0xdeadbeef;
+ err = struct_ops_module__load(skel);
+ ASSERT_ERR(err, "struct_ops_module_load_not_zeroed");
+
+ struct_ops_module__destroy(skel);
+}
+
void serial_test_struct_ops_module(void)
{
if (test__start_subtest("test_struct_ops_load"))
test_struct_ops_load();
+ if (test__start_subtest("test_struct_ops_not_zeroed"))
+ test_struct_ops_not_zeroed();
}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_module.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_module.c
index 026cabfa7f1f..d7d7606f639c 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_module.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_module.c
@@ -54,3 +54,16 @@ struct bpf_testmod_ops___v2 testmod_2 = {
.test_1 = (void *)test_1,
.test_2 = (void *)test_2_v2,
};
+
+struct bpf_testmod_ops___zeroed {
+ int (*test_1)(void);
+ void (*test_2)(int a, int b);
+ int (*test_maybe_null)(int dummy, struct task_struct *task);
+ int zeroed;
+};
+
+SEC(".struct_ops.link")
+struct bpf_testmod_ops___zeroed testmod_zeroed = {
+ .test_1 = (void *)test_1,
+ .test_2 = (void *)test_2_v2,
+};
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-12 18:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-12 18:32 [PATCH bpf-next 0/2] Ignore additional fields in the struct_ops maps in an updated version Kui-Feng Lee
2024-03-12 18:32 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] libbpf: Skip zeroed or null fields if not found in the kernel type Kui-Feng Lee
2024-03-12 23:01 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-03-13 0:22 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2024-03-12 18:32 ` Kui-Feng Lee [this message]
2024-03-12 23:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/2] selftests/bpf: Ensure libbpf skip all-zeros fields of struct_ops maps Andrii Nakryiko
2024-03-13 0:56 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2024-03-13 15:52 ` Andrii Nakryiko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240312183245.341141-3-thinker.li@gmail.com \
--to=thinker.li@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=kuifeng@meta.com \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=sinquersw@gmail.com \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox