[PATCH v2 bpf-next 1/5] bpf: flatten bpf_probe_register call chain

[Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>]

bpf_probe_register() and __bpf_probe_register() have identical
signatures and bpf_probe_register() just redirect to
__bpf_probe_register(). So get rid of this extra function call step to
simplify following the source code.

It has no difference at runtime due to inlining, of course.

Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c | 7 +------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
index 0a5c4efc73c3..f29735bb7aed 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
@@ -2429,7 +2429,7 @@ BPF_TRACE_DEFN_x(10);
 BPF_TRACE_DEFN_x(11);
 BPF_TRACE_DEFN_x(12);
 
-static int __bpf_probe_register(struct bpf_raw_event_map *btp, struct bpf_prog *prog)
+int bpf_probe_register(struct bpf_raw_event_map *btp, struct bpf_prog *prog)
 {
 	struct tracepoint *tp = btp->tp;
 
@@ -2447,11 +2447,6 @@ static int __bpf_probe_register(struct bpf_raw_event_map *btp, struct bpf_prog *
 						   prog);
 }
 
-int bpf_probe_register(struct bpf_raw_event_map *btp, struct bpf_prog *prog)
-{
-	return __bpf_probe_register(btp, prog);
-}
-
 int bpf_probe_unregister(struct bpf_raw_event_map *btp, struct bpf_prog *prog)
 {
 	return tracepoint_probe_unregister(btp->tp, (void *)btp->bpf_func, prog);
-- 
2.43.0