From: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
kernel-team@fb.com, Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v2 4/5] selftests/bpf: Fix kprobe_multi_bench_attach test failure with LTO kernel
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 13:01:19 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240321200119.2220027-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240321200058.2218328-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev>
In my locally build clang LTO kernel (enabling CONFIG_LTO and
CONFIG_LTO_CLANG_THIN), kprobe_multi_bench_attach/kernel subtest
failed like:
test_kprobe_multi_bench_attach:PASS:get_syms 0 nsec
test_kprobe_multi_bench_attach:PASS:kprobe_multi_empty__open_and_load 0 nsec
libbpf: prog 'test_kprobe_empty': failed to attach: No such process
test_kprobe_multi_bench_attach:FAIL:bpf_program__attach_kprobe_multi_opts unexpected error: -3
#117/1 kprobe_multi_bench_attach/kernel:FAIL
There are multiple symbols in /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/available_filter_functions
are renamed in /proc/kallsyms due to cross file inlining. One example is for
static function __access_remote_vm in mm/memory.c.
In a non-LTO kernel, we have the following call stack:
ptrace_access_vm (global, kernel/ptrace.c)
access_remote_vm (global, mm/memory.c)
__access_remote_vm (static, mm/memory.c)
With LTO kernel, it is possible that access_remote_vm() is inlined by
ptrace_access_vm(). So we end up with the following call stack:
ptrace_access_vm (global, kernel/ptrace.c)
__access_remote_vm (static, mm/memory.c)
The compiler renames __access_remote_vm to __access_remote_vm.llvm.<hash>
to prevent potential name collision.
The kernel bpf_kprobe_multi_link_attach() and ftrace_lookup_symbols() try
to find addresses based on /proc/kallsyms, hence the current test failed
with LTO kenrel.
This patch removed __access_remote_vm and other similar functions from
kprobe_multi_attach by checking if the symbol like __access_remote_vm
does not exist in kallsyms with LTO kernel. The test succeeded after this change:
#117/1 kprobe_multi_bench_attach/kernel:OK
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
---
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kprobe_multi_test.c | 12 ++++++++++++
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kprobe_multi_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kprobe_multi_test.c
index 05000810e28e..f6130f4f3d88 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kprobe_multi_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kprobe_multi_test.c
@@ -345,6 +345,9 @@ static int get_syms(char ***symsp, size_t *cntp, bool kernel)
FILE *f;
int err = 0;
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(load_kallsyms(), "load_kallsyms"))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
/*
* The available_filter_functions contains many duplicates,
* but other than that all symbols are usable in kprobe multi
@@ -393,6 +396,15 @@ static int get_syms(char ***symsp, size_t *cntp, bool kernel)
if (!strncmp(name, "__ftrace_invalid_address__",
sizeof("__ftrace_invalid_address__") - 1))
continue;
+ /*
+ * In certain cases, e.g., clang lto kernel, the 'name' here
+ * may be different from the one in /proc/kallsyms due to
+ * /proc/kallsyms name might be "<name>.llvm.<hash>" instead
+ * of "<name>". Exclude these 'name's since they will cause
+ * later kprobe_multi_attach failure.
+ */
+ if (ksym_get_addr(name) == 0)
+ continue;
err = hashmap__add(map, name, 0);
if (err == -EEXIST) {
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-21 20:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-21 20:00 [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/5] bpf: Fix a couple of test failures with LTO kernel Yonghong Song
2024-03-21 20:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/5] selftests/bpf: Replace CHECK with ASSERT macros for ksyms test Yonghong Song
2024-03-22 12:38 ` Jiri Olsa
2024-03-22 16:13 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-03-22 16:41 ` Yonghong Song
2024-03-22 16:48 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-03-22 17:28 ` Yonghong Song
2024-03-21 20:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/5] libbpf: Mark libbpf_kallsyms_parse static function Yonghong Song
2024-03-22 12:37 ` Jiri Olsa
2024-03-22 15:37 ` Yonghong Song
2024-03-21 20:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 3/5] libbpf: Handle <orig_name>.llvm.<hash> symbol properly Yonghong Song
2024-03-21 21:54 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-03-21 23:55 ` Yonghong Song
2024-03-22 0:02 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-03-22 0:17 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-03-22 0:32 ` Yonghong Song
2024-03-22 0:18 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-03-22 0:34 ` Yonghong Song
2024-03-22 21:50 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-03-22 22:09 ` Yonghong Song
2024-03-21 20:01 ` Yonghong Song [this message]
2024-03-22 12:37 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 4/5] selftests/bpf: Fix kprobe_multi_bench_attach test failure with LTO kernel Jiri Olsa
2024-03-22 16:01 ` Yonghong Song
2024-03-22 21:53 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-03-22 22:20 ` Yonghong Song
2024-03-21 20:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 5/5] selftests/bpf: Add a selftest with available_filter_functions_addrs Yonghong Song
2024-03-22 12:26 ` Jiri Olsa
2024-03-22 16:07 ` Yonghong Song
2024-03-22 21:58 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-03-22 22:23 ` Yonghong Song
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240321200119.2220027-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev \
--to=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox