BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	kernel-team@fb.com, Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v3 4/8] selftests/bpf: Refactor some functions for kprobe_multi_test
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 21:15:03 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240326041503.1198982-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240326041443.1197498-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev>

Refactor some functions in kprobe_multi_test.c to extract
some helper functions who will be used in later patches
to avoid code duplication.

Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
---
 .../bpf/prog_tests/kprobe_multi_test.c        | 94 +++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 57 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kprobe_multi_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kprobe_multi_test.c
index 05000810e28e..46e28edda595 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kprobe_multi_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kprobe_multi_test.c
@@ -336,6 +336,37 @@ static bool symbol_equal(long key1, long key2, void *ctx __maybe_unused)
 	return strcmp((const char *) key1, (const char *) key2) == 0;
 }
 
+static bool is_invalid_entry(char *buf, bool kernel)
+{
+	if (kernel && strchr(buf, '['))
+		return true;
+	if (!kernel && !strchr(buf, '['))
+		return true;
+	return false;
+}
+
+static bool skip_entry(char *name)
+{
+	/*
+	 * We attach to almost all kernel functions and some of them
+	 * will cause 'suspicious RCU usage' when fprobe is attached
+	 * to them. Filter out the current culprits - arch_cpu_idle
+	 * default_idle and rcu_* functions.
+	 */
+	if (!strcmp(name, "arch_cpu_idle"))
+		return true;
+	if (!strcmp(name, "default_idle"))
+		return true;
+	if (!strncmp(name, "rcu_", 4))
+		return true;
+	if (!strcmp(name, "bpf_dispatcher_xdp_func"))
+		return true;
+	if (!strncmp(name, "__ftrace_invalid_address__",
+		     sizeof("__ftrace_invalid_address__") - 1))
+		return true;
+	return false;
+}
+
 static int get_syms(char ***symsp, size_t *cntp, bool kernel)
 {
 	size_t cap = 0, cnt = 0, i;
@@ -368,30 +399,13 @@ static int get_syms(char ***symsp, size_t *cntp, bool kernel)
 	}
 
 	while (fgets(buf, sizeof(buf), f)) {
-		if (kernel && strchr(buf, '['))
-			continue;
-		if (!kernel && !strchr(buf, '['))
+		if (is_invalid_entry(buf, kernel))
 			continue;
 
 		free(name);
 		if (sscanf(buf, "%ms$*[^\n]\n", &name) != 1)
 			continue;
-		/*
-		 * We attach to almost all kernel functions and some of them
-		 * will cause 'suspicious RCU usage' when fprobe is attached
-		 * to them. Filter out the current culprits - arch_cpu_idle
-		 * default_idle and rcu_* functions.
-		 */
-		if (!strcmp(name, "arch_cpu_idle"))
-			continue;
-		if (!strcmp(name, "default_idle"))
-			continue;
-		if (!strncmp(name, "rcu_", 4))
-			continue;
-		if (!strcmp(name, "bpf_dispatcher_xdp_func"))
-			continue;
-		if (!strncmp(name, "__ftrace_invalid_address__",
-			     sizeof("__ftrace_invalid_address__") - 1))
+		if (skip_entry(name))
 			continue;
 
 		err = hashmap__add(map, name, 0);
@@ -426,34 +440,20 @@ static int get_syms(char ***symsp, size_t *cntp, bool kernel)
 	return err;
 }
 
-static void test_kprobe_multi_bench_attach(bool kernel)
+static void do_bench_test(struct kprobe_multi_empty *skel, struct bpf_kprobe_multi_opts *opts)
 {
-	LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_kprobe_multi_opts, opts);
-	struct kprobe_multi_empty *skel = NULL;
 	long attach_start_ns, attach_end_ns;
 	long detach_start_ns, detach_end_ns;
 	double attach_delta, detach_delta;
 	struct bpf_link *link = NULL;
-	char **syms = NULL;
-	size_t cnt = 0, i;
-
-	if (!ASSERT_OK(get_syms(&syms, &cnt, kernel), "get_syms"))
-		return;
-
-	skel = kprobe_multi_empty__open_and_load();
-	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "kprobe_multi_empty__open_and_load"))
-		goto cleanup;
-
-	opts.syms = (const char **) syms;
-	opts.cnt = cnt;
 
 	attach_start_ns = get_time_ns();
 	link = bpf_program__attach_kprobe_multi_opts(skel->progs.test_kprobe_empty,
-						     NULL, &opts);
+						     NULL, opts);
 	attach_end_ns = get_time_ns();
 
 	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(link, "bpf_program__attach_kprobe_multi_opts"))
-		goto cleanup;
+		return;
 
 	detach_start_ns = get_time_ns();
 	bpf_link__destroy(link);
@@ -462,9 +462,29 @@ static void test_kprobe_multi_bench_attach(bool kernel)
 	attach_delta = (attach_end_ns - attach_start_ns) / 1000000000.0;
 	detach_delta = (detach_end_ns - detach_start_ns) / 1000000000.0;
 
-	printf("%s: found %lu functions\n", __func__, cnt);
+	printf("%s: found %lu functions\n", __func__, opts->cnt);
 	printf("%s: attached in %7.3lfs\n", __func__, attach_delta);
 	printf("%s: detached in %7.3lfs\n", __func__, detach_delta);
+}
+
+static void test_kprobe_multi_bench_attach(bool kernel)
+{
+	LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_kprobe_multi_opts, opts);
+	struct kprobe_multi_empty *skel = NULL;
+	char **syms = NULL;
+	size_t cnt = 0, i;
+
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(get_syms(&syms, &cnt, kernel), "get_syms"))
+		return;
+
+	skel = kprobe_multi_empty__open_and_load();
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "kprobe_multi_empty__open_and_load"))
+		goto cleanup;
+
+	opts.syms = (const char **) syms;
+	opts.cnt = cnt;
+
+	do_bench_test(skel, &opts);
 
 cleanup:
 	kprobe_multi_empty__destroy(skel);
-- 
2.43.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-03-26  4:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-26  4:14 [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/8] bpf: Fix a couple of test failures with LTO kernel Yonghong Song
2024-03-26  4:14 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 1/8] selftests/bpf: Replace CHECK with ASSERT macros for ksyms test Yonghong Song
2024-03-26  4:14 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 2/8] libbpf: Mark libbpf_kallsyms_parse static function Yonghong Song
2024-03-26  4:14 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 3/8] libbpf: Handle <orig_name>.llvm.<hash> symbol properly Yonghong Song
2024-03-26  4:15 ` Yonghong Song [this message]
2024-03-26  4:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 5/8] selftests/bpf: Refactor trace helper func load_kallsyms_local() Yonghong Song
2024-03-26  4:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 6/8] selftests/bpf: Add {load,search}_kallsyms_custom_local() Yonghong Song
2024-03-26  4:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 7/8] selftests/bpf: Fix kprobe_multi_bench_attach test failure with LTO kernel Yonghong Song
2024-03-26  4:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 8/8] selftests/bpf: Add a kprobe_multi subtest to use addrs instead of syms Yonghong Song
2024-03-28  2:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/8] bpf: Fix a couple of test failures with LTO kernel patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240326041503.1198982-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    --to=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox