From: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
To: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, john.fastabend@gmail.com,
andrii@kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev, eddyz87@gmail.com,
song@kernel.org, yonghong.song@linux.dev, kpsingh@kernel.org,
sdf@google.com, haoluo@google.com, jolsa@kernel.org
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v5 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add selftest for bits iter
Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2024 11:41:54 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240331034154.16284-3-laoar.shao@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240331034154.16284-1-laoar.shao@gmail.com>
Add test cases for the bits iter:
- bpf_iter_bits_destroy() is required after calling
bpf_iter_bits_new()
- bpf_iter_bits_destroy() can only destroy an initialized iter
- bpf_iter_bits_next() must use an initialized iter
Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
---
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c | 2 +
.../selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_bits_iter.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 59 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_bits_iter.c
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c
index c4f9f306646e..7e04ecaaa20a 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c
@@ -84,6 +84,7 @@
#include "verifier_xadd.skel.h"
#include "verifier_xdp.skel.h"
#include "verifier_xdp_direct_packet_access.skel.h"
+#include "verifier_bits_iter.skel.h"
#define MAX_ENTRIES 11
@@ -198,6 +199,7 @@ void test_verifier_var_off(void) { RUN(verifier_var_off); }
void test_verifier_xadd(void) { RUN(verifier_xadd); }
void test_verifier_xdp(void) { RUN(verifier_xdp); }
void test_verifier_xdp_direct_packet_access(void) { RUN(verifier_xdp_direct_packet_access); }
+void test_verifier_bits_iter(void) { RUN(verifier_bits_iter); }
static int init_test_val_map(struct bpf_object *obj, char *map_name)
{
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_bits_iter.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_bits_iter.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..5401b0944ca7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_bits_iter.c
@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
+/* Copyright (c) 2024 Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com> */
+
+#include "vmlinux.h"
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
+
+#include "bpf_misc.h"
+#include "task_kfunc_common.h"
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
+
+int bpf_iter_bits_new(struct bpf_iter_bits *it, const void *unsafe_ptr__ign,
+ u32 nr_bits) __ksym __weak;
+int *bpf_iter_bits_next(struct bpf_iter_bits *it) __ksym __weak;
+void bpf_iter_bits_destroy(struct bpf_iter_bits *it) __ksym __weak;
+
+SEC("iter.s/cgroup")
+__description("bits iter without destroy")
+__failure __msg("Unreleased reference")
+int BPF_PROG(no_destroy, struct bpf_iter_meta *meta, struct cgroup *cgrp)
+{
+ struct bpf_iter_bits it;
+ struct task_struct *p;
+
+ p = bpf_task_from_pid(1);
+ if (!p)
+ return 1;
+
+ bpf_iter_bits_new(&it, p->cpus_ptr, 8192);
+
+ bpf_iter_bits_next(&it);
+ bpf_task_release(p);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("iter/cgroup")
+__description("bits iter with uninitialized iter in ->next()")
+__failure __msg("expected an initialized iter_bits as arg #1")
+int BPF_PROG(next_uninit, struct bpf_iter_meta *meta, struct cgroup *cgrp)
+{
+ struct bpf_iter_bits *it = NULL;
+
+ bpf_iter_bits_next(it);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("iter/cgroup")
+__description("bits iter with uninitialized iter in ->destroy()")
+__failure __msg("expected an initialized iter_bits as arg #1")
+int BPF_PROG(destroy_uninit, struct bpf_iter_meta *meta, struct cgroup *cgrp)
+{
+ struct bpf_iter_bits it = {};
+
+ bpf_iter_bits_destroy(&it);
+ return 0;
+}
--
2.30.1 (Apple Git-130)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-31 3:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-31 3:41 [PATCH bpf-next v5 0/2] bpf: Add a generic bits iterator Yafang Shao
2024-03-31 3:41 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 1/2] bpf: Add " Yafang Shao
2024-03-31 3:41 ` Yafang Shao [this message]
2024-04-02 17:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 0/2] bpf: Add a generic " Andrii Nakryiko
2024-04-03 3:33 ` Yafang Shao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240331034154.16284-3-laoar.shao@gmail.com \
--to=laoar.shao@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=sdf@google.com \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox