From: Philo Lu <lulie@linux.alibaba.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, john.fastabend@gmail.com,
andrii@kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev, eddyz87@gmail.com,
song@kernel.org, yonghong.song@linux.dev, kpsingh@kernel.org,
sdf@google.com, haoluo@google.com, jolsa@kernel.org,
mykolal@fb.com, shuah@kernel.org, xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 3/3] selftests/bpf: add test for bpf_for_each_map_elem() with different maps
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2024 14:16:15 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240402061615.48894-4-lulie@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240402061615.48894-1-lulie@linux.alibaba.com>
A test is added for bpf_for_each_map_elem() with either an arraymap or a
hashmap.
$ tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs -t for_each
#93/1 for_each/hash_map:OK
#93/2 for_each/array_map:OK
#93/3 for_each/write_map_key:OK
#93/4 for_each/multi_maps:OK
#93 for_each:OK
Summary: 1/4 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
Signed-off-by: Philo Lu <lulie@linux.alibaba.com>
---
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/for_each.c | 67 +++++++++++++++++++
.../selftests/bpf/progs/for_each_multi_maps.c | 49 ++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 116 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/for_each_multi_maps.c
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/for_each.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/for_each.c
index 8963f8a549f2..61c5e064f89c 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/for_each.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/for_each.c
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
#include "for_each_hash_map_elem.skel.h"
#include "for_each_array_map_elem.skel.h"
#include "for_each_map_elem_write_key.skel.h"
+#include "for_each_multi_maps.skel.h"
static unsigned int duration;
@@ -143,6 +144,70 @@ static void test_write_map_key(void)
for_each_map_elem_write_key__destroy(skel);
}
+static void test_multi_maps(void)
+{
+ struct for_each_multi_maps *skel;
+ __u64 val, array_total, hash_total;
+ __u32 key, max_entries;
+ int i, err;
+
+ LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_test_run_opts, topts,
+ .data_in = &pkt_v4,
+ .data_size_in = sizeof(pkt_v4),
+ .repeat = 1,
+ );
+
+ skel = for_each_multi_maps__open_and_load();
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "for_each_multi_maps__open_and_load"))
+ return;
+
+ array_total = 0;
+ /* left last element as empty */
+ max_entries = bpf_map__max_entries(skel->maps.arraymap) - 1;
+ for (i = 0; i < max_entries; i++) {
+ key = i;
+ val = i + 1;
+ array_total += val;
+ err = bpf_map__update_elem(skel->maps.arraymap, &key, sizeof(key),
+ &val, sizeof(val), BPF_ANY);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "array_map_update"))
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ hash_total = 0;
+ max_entries = bpf_map__max_entries(skel->maps.hashmap) - 1;
+ for (i = 0; i < max_entries; i++) {
+ key = i + 100;
+ val = i + 1;
+ hash_total += val;
+ err = bpf_map__update_elem(skel->maps.hashmap, &key, sizeof(key),
+ &val, sizeof(val), BPF_ANY);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "hash_map_update"))
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ skel->bss->data_output = 0;
+ skel->bss->use_array = 1;
+ err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.test_pkt_access), &topts);
+ if (CHECK(err || topts.retval, "ipv4", "err %d errno %d retval %d\n",
+ err, errno, topts.retval))
+ goto out;
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->data_output, array_total, "array output");
+
+ skel->bss->data_output = 0;
+ skel->bss->use_array = 0;
+ err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.test_pkt_access), &topts);
+ if (CHECK(err || topts.retval, "ipv4", "err %d errno %d retval %d\n",
+ err, errno, topts.retval))
+ goto out;
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->data_output, hash_total, "hash output");
+
+out:
+ for_each_multi_maps__destroy(skel);
+}
+
void test_for_each(void)
{
if (test__start_subtest("hash_map"))
@@ -151,4 +216,6 @@ void test_for_each(void)
test_array_map();
if (test__start_subtest("write_map_key"))
test_write_map_key();
+ if (test__start_subtest("multi_maps"))
+ test_multi_maps();
}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/for_each_multi_maps.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/for_each_multi_maps.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..ff0bed7d4459
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/for_each_multi_maps.c
@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+#include "vmlinux.h"
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
+
+struct {
+ __uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY);
+ __uint(max_entries, 3);
+ __type(key, __u32);
+ __type(value, __u64);
+} arraymap SEC(".maps");
+
+struct {
+ __uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH);
+ __uint(max_entries, 5);
+ __type(key, __u32);
+ __type(value, __u64);
+} hashmap SEC(".maps");
+
+struct callback_ctx {
+ int output;
+};
+
+u32 data_output = 0;
+int use_array = 0;
+
+static __u64
+check_map_elem(struct bpf_map *map, __u32 *key, __u64 *val,
+ struct callback_ctx *data)
+{
+ data->output += *val;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("tc")
+int test_pkt_access(struct __sk_buff *skb)
+{
+ struct callback_ctx data;
+
+ data.output = 0;
+ if (use_array)
+ bpf_for_each_map_elem(&arraymap, check_map_elem, &data, 0);
+ else
+ bpf_for_each_map_elem(&hashmap, check_map_elem, &data, 0);
+ data_output = data.output;
+
+ return 0;
+}
--
2.32.0.3.g01195cf9f
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-02 6:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-02 6:16 [PATCH bpf-next 0/3] bpf: allow bpf_for_each_map_elem() helper with different input maps Philo Lu
2024-04-02 6:16 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/3] bpf: store both map ptr and state in bpf_insn_aux_data Philo Lu
2024-04-04 22:08 ` Yonghong Song
2024-04-02 6:16 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/3] bpf: allow invoking bpf_for_each_map_elem with different maps Philo Lu
2024-04-04 22:15 ` Yonghong Song
2024-04-02 6:16 ` Philo Lu [this message]
2024-04-04 22:35 ` [PATCH bpf-next 3/3] selftests/bpf: add test for bpf_for_each_map_elem() " Yonghong Song
2024-04-05 2:05 ` Philo Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240402061615.48894-4-lulie@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=lulie@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=mykolal@fb.com \
--cc=sdf@google.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox