From: Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev,
song@kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com, andrii@kernel.org
Cc: sinquersw@gmail.com, kuifeng@meta.com,
Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 0/2] Update a struct_ops link through a pinned path
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 17:25:11 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240417002513.1534535-1-thinker.li@gmail.com> (raw)
Applications already have the ability to update a struct_ops link with
another struct_ops map. However, they were unable to open pinned paths
of the links. This implies that updating a link through its pinned
paths was not feasible. By allowing the "open" operator on pinned
paths, applications can pin a struct_ops link and update the link
through the pinned path later.
Kui-Feng Lee (2):
bpf: enable the "open" operator on a pinned path of a struct_osp link.
selftests/bpf: open a pinned path of a struct_ops link.
include/linux/bpf.h | 4 ++
kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c | 10 ++++
kernel/bpf/inode.c | 11 +++-
kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 14 ++++-
.../selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c | 6 ++
.../bpf/prog_tests/test_struct_ops_module.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++++
6 files changed, 97 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--
2.34.1
next reply other threads:[~2024-04-17 0:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-17 0:25 Kui-Feng Lee [this message]
2024-04-17 0:25 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] bpf: enable the "open" operator on a pinned path of a struct_osp link Kui-Feng Lee
2024-04-17 23:19 ` kernel test robot
2024-04-18 6:13 ` kernel test robot
2024-04-20 0:05 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-04-22 17:12 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2024-04-22 17:30 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2024-04-22 23:43 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-04-23 17:16 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2024-04-24 0:29 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-04-25 0:17 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-04-25 17:11 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2024-04-17 0:25 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/2] selftests/bpf: open a pinned path of a struct_ops link Kui-Feng Lee
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240417002513.1534535-1-thinker.li@gmail.com \
--to=thinker.li@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=kuifeng@meta.com \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=sinquersw@gmail.com \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox