BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jordan Rife <jrife@google.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jordan Rife <jrife@google.com>,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,  netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	 Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	 Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
	Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>, Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
	 Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	 KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
	Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>, Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>,
	 Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@fb.com>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	 Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@gmail.com>,
	Artem Savkov <asavkov@redhat.com>,
	 Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com>,
	Menglong Dong <imagedong@tencent.com>, Daniel Xu <dxu@dxuuu.xyz>,
	 David Vernet <void@manifault.com>,
	Daan De Meyer <daan.j.demeyer@gmail.com>,
	 Benjamin Tissoires <bentiss@kernel.org>,
	Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>,
	 Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 bpf-next 2/6] selftests/bpf: Implement socket kfuncs for bpf_testmod
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 16:45:19 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240429214529.2644801-3-jrife@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240429214529.2644801-1-jrife@google.com>

This patch adds a set of kfuncs to bpf_testmod that can be used to
manipulate a socket from kernel space.

Signed-off-by: Jordan Rife <jrife@google.com>
---
 .../selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c   | 255 ++++++++++++++++++
 .../bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod_kfunc.h       |  27 ++
 2 files changed, 282 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c
index eb2b78552ca29..e93013fc7bf4d 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c
@@ -10,18 +10,30 @@
 #include <linux/percpu-defs.h>
 #include <linux/sysfs.h>
 #include <linux/tracepoint.h>
+#include <linux/net.h>
+#include <linux/socket.h>
+#include <linux/nsproxy.h>
+#include <linux/inet.h>
+#include <linux/in.h>
+#include <linux/in6.h>
+#include <linux/un.h>
+#include <net/sock.h>
 #include "bpf_testmod.h"
 #include "bpf_testmod_kfunc.h"
 
 #define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
 #include "bpf_testmod-events.h"
 
+#define CONNECT_TIMEOUT_SEC 1
+
 typedef int (*func_proto_typedef)(long);
 typedef int (*func_proto_typedef_nested1)(func_proto_typedef);
 typedef int (*func_proto_typedef_nested2)(func_proto_typedef_nested1);
 
 DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, bpf_testmod_ksym_percpu) = 123;
 long bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_result;
+static DEFINE_MUTEX(sock_lock);
+static struct socket *sock;
 
 struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_1 {
 	int a;
@@ -498,6 +510,237 @@ __bpf_kfunc void bpf_kfunc_call_test_sleepable(void)
 {
 }
 
+__bpf_kfunc int bpf_kfunc_init_sock(struct init_sock_args *args)
+{
+	int proto;
+	int err;
+
+	mutex_lock(&sock_lock);
+
+	if (sock) {
+		pr_err("%s called without releasing old sock", __func__);
+		err = -EPERM;
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	switch (args->af) {
+	case AF_INET:
+	case AF_INET6:
+		proto = args->type == SOCK_STREAM ? IPPROTO_TCP : IPPROTO_UDP;
+		break;
+	case AF_UNIX:
+		proto = PF_UNIX;
+		break;
+	default:
+		pr_err("invalid address family %d\n", args->af);
+		err = -EINVAL;
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	err = sock_create_kern(current->nsproxy->net_ns, args->af, args->type,
+			       proto, &sock);
+
+	if (!err)
+		/* Set timeout for call to kernel_connect() to prevent it from hanging,
+		 * and consider the connection attempt failed if it returns
+		 * -EINPROGRESS.
+		 */
+		sock->sk->sk_sndtimeo = CONNECT_TIMEOUT_SEC * HZ;
+out:
+	mutex_unlock(&sock_lock);
+
+	return err;
+}
+
+__bpf_kfunc void bpf_kfunc_close_sock(void)
+{
+	mutex_lock(&sock_lock);
+
+	if (sock) {
+		sock_release(sock);
+		sock = NULL;
+	}
+
+	mutex_unlock(&sock_lock);
+}
+
+__bpf_kfunc int bpf_kfunc_call_kernel_connect(struct addr_args *args)
+{
+	int err;
+
+	if (args->addrlen > sizeof(args->addr))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	mutex_lock(&sock_lock);
+
+	if (!sock) {
+		pr_err("%s called without initializing sock", __func__);
+		err = -EPERM;
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	err = kernel_connect(sock, (struct sockaddr *)&args->addr,
+			     args->addrlen, 0);
+out:
+	mutex_unlock(&sock_lock);
+
+	return err;
+}
+
+__bpf_kfunc int bpf_kfunc_call_kernel_bind(struct addr_args *args)
+{
+	int err;
+
+	if (args->addrlen > sizeof(args->addr))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	mutex_lock(&sock_lock);
+
+	if (!sock) {
+		pr_err("%s called without initializing sock", __func__);
+		err = -EPERM;
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	err = kernel_bind(sock, (struct sockaddr *)&args->addr, args->addrlen);
+out:
+	mutex_unlock(&sock_lock);
+
+	return err;
+}
+
+__bpf_kfunc int bpf_kfunc_call_kernel_listen(void)
+{
+	int err;
+
+	mutex_lock(&sock_lock);
+
+	if (!sock) {
+		pr_err("%s called without initializing sock", __func__);
+		err = -EPERM;
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	err = kernel_listen(sock, 128);
+out:
+	mutex_unlock(&sock_lock);
+
+	return err;
+}
+
+__bpf_kfunc int bpf_kfunc_call_kernel_sendmsg(struct sendmsg_args *args)
+{
+	struct msghdr msg = {
+		.msg_name	= &args->addr.addr,
+		.msg_namelen	= args->addr.addrlen,
+	};
+	struct kvec iov;
+	int err;
+
+	if (args->addr.addrlen > sizeof(args->addr.addr) ||
+	    args->msglen > sizeof(args->msg))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	iov.iov_base = args->msg;
+	iov.iov_len  = args->msglen;
+
+	mutex_lock(&sock_lock);
+
+	if (!sock) {
+		pr_err("%s called without initializing sock", __func__);
+		err = -EPERM;
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	err = kernel_sendmsg(sock, &msg, &iov, 1, args->msglen);
+	args->addr.addrlen = msg.msg_namelen;
+out:
+	mutex_unlock(&sock_lock);
+
+	return err;
+}
+
+__bpf_kfunc int bpf_kfunc_call_sock_sendmsg(struct sendmsg_args *args)
+{
+	struct msghdr msg = {
+		.msg_name	= &args->addr.addr,
+		.msg_namelen	= args->addr.addrlen,
+	};
+	struct kvec iov;
+	int err;
+
+	if (args->addr.addrlen > sizeof(args->addr.addr) ||
+	    args->msglen > sizeof(args->msg))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	iov.iov_base = args->msg;
+	iov.iov_len  = args->msglen;
+
+	iov_iter_kvec(&msg.msg_iter, ITER_SOURCE, &iov, 1, args->msglen);
+	mutex_lock(&sock_lock);
+
+	if (!sock) {
+		pr_err("%s called without initializing sock", __func__);
+		err = -EPERM;
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	err = sock_sendmsg(sock, &msg);
+	args->addr.addrlen = msg.msg_namelen;
+out:
+	mutex_unlock(&sock_lock);
+
+	return err;
+}
+
+__bpf_kfunc int bpf_kfunc_call_kernel_getsockname(struct addr_args *args)
+{
+	int err;
+
+	mutex_lock(&sock_lock);
+
+	if (!sock) {
+		pr_err("%s called without initializing sock", __func__);
+		err = -EPERM;
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	err = kernel_getsockname(sock, (struct sockaddr *)&args->addr);
+	if (err < 0)
+		goto out;
+
+	args->addrlen = err;
+	err = 0;
+out:
+	mutex_unlock(&sock_lock);
+
+	return err;
+}
+
+__bpf_kfunc int bpf_kfunc_call_kernel_getpeername(struct addr_args *args)
+{
+	int err;
+
+	mutex_lock(&sock_lock);
+
+	if (!sock) {
+		pr_err("%s called without initializing sock", __func__);
+		err = -EPERM;
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	err = kernel_getpeername(sock, (struct sockaddr *)&args->addr);
+	if (err < 0)
+		goto out;
+
+	args->addrlen = err;
+	err = 0;
+out:
+	mutex_unlock(&sock_lock);
+
+	return err;
+}
+
 BTF_KFUNCS_START(bpf_testmod_check_kfunc_ids)
 BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_testmod_test_mod_kfunc)
 BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test1)
@@ -525,6 +768,15 @@ BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test_destructive, KF_DESTRUCTIVE)
 BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test_static_unused_arg)
 BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test_offset)
 BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test_sleepable, KF_SLEEPABLE)
+BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_init_sock, KF_SLEEPABLE)
+BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_close_sock, KF_SLEEPABLE)
+BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_call_kernel_connect, KF_SLEEPABLE)
+BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_call_kernel_bind, KF_SLEEPABLE)
+BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_call_kernel_listen, KF_SLEEPABLE)
+BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_call_kernel_sendmsg, KF_SLEEPABLE)
+BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_call_sock_sendmsg, KF_SLEEPABLE)
+BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_call_kernel_getsockname, KF_SLEEPABLE)
+BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_call_kernel_getpeername, KF_SLEEPABLE)
 BTF_KFUNCS_END(bpf_testmod_check_kfunc_ids)
 
 static int bpf_testmod_ops_init(struct btf *btf)
@@ -655,6 +907,8 @@ static int bpf_testmod_init(void)
 		return ret;
 	if (bpf_fentry_test1(0) < 0)
 		return -EINVAL;
+	sock = NULL;
+	mutex_init(&sock_lock);
 	return sysfs_create_bin_file(kernel_kobj, &bin_attr_bpf_testmod_file);
 }
 
@@ -668,6 +922,7 @@ static void bpf_testmod_exit(void)
 	while (refcount_read(&prog_test_struct.cnt) > 1)
 		msleep(20);
 
+	bpf_kfunc_close_sock();
 	sysfs_remove_bin_file(kernel_kobj, &bin_attr_bpf_testmod_file);
 }
 
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod_kfunc.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod_kfunc.h
index ce5cd763561ca..b0d586a6751fa 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod_kfunc.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod_kfunc.h
@@ -64,6 +64,22 @@ struct prog_test_fail3 {
 	char arr2[];
 };
 
+struct init_sock_args {
+	int af;
+	int type;
+};
+
+struct addr_args {
+	char addr[sizeof(struct __kernel_sockaddr_storage)];
+	int addrlen;
+};
+
+struct sendmsg_args {
+	struct addr_args addr;
+	char msg[10];
+	int msglen;
+};
+
 struct prog_test_ref_kfunc *
 bpf_kfunc_call_test_acquire(unsigned long *scalar_ptr) __ksym;
 void bpf_kfunc_call_test_release(struct prog_test_ref_kfunc *p) __ksym;
@@ -107,4 +123,15 @@ void bpf_kfunc_call_test_fail3(struct prog_test_fail3 *p);
 void bpf_kfunc_call_test_mem_len_fail1(void *mem, int len);
 
 void bpf_kfunc_common_test(void) __ksym;
+
+int bpf_kfunc_init_sock(struct init_sock_args *args) __ksym;
+void bpf_kfunc_close_sock(void) __ksym;
+int bpf_kfunc_call_kernel_connect(struct addr_args *args) __ksym;
+int bpf_kfunc_call_kernel_bind(struct addr_args *args) __ksym;
+int bpf_kfunc_call_kernel_listen(void) __ksym;
+int bpf_kfunc_call_kernel_sendmsg(struct sendmsg_args *args) __ksym;
+int bpf_kfunc_call_sock_sendmsg(struct sendmsg_args *args) __ksym;
+int bpf_kfunc_call_kernel_getsockname(struct addr_args *args) __ksym;
+int bpf_kfunc_call_kernel_getpeername(struct addr_args *args) __ksym;
+
 #endif /* _BPF_TESTMOD_KFUNC_H */
-- 
2.44.0.769.g3c40516874-goog


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-04-29 21:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-29 21:45 [PATCH v3 bpf-next 0/6] selftests/bpf: Add sockaddr tests for kernel networking Jordan Rife
2024-04-29 21:45 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 1/6] selftests/bpf: Fix bind program for big endian systems Jordan Rife
2024-04-29 21:45 ` Jordan Rife [this message]
2024-04-29 21:45 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 3/6] selftests/bpf: Implement BPF programs for kernel socket operations Jordan Rife
2024-04-29 21:45 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 4/6] selftests/bpf: Move IPv4 and IPv6 sockaddr test cases Jordan Rife
2024-04-29 21:45 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 5/6] selftests/bpf: Make sock configurable for each test case Jordan Rife
2024-04-29 21:45 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 6/6] selftests/bpf: Add kernel socket operation tests Jordan Rife
2024-05-02 22:30 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 0/6] selftests/bpf: Add sockaddr tests for kernel networking patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240429214529.2644801-3-jrife@google.com \
    --to=jrife@google.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=asavkov@redhat.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bentiss@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daan.j.demeyer@gmail.com \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davemarchevsky@fb.com \
    --cc=dxu@dxuuu.xyz \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=houtao1@huawei.com \
    --cc=imagedong@tencent.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=mykolal@fb.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sdf@google.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=thinker.li@gmail.com \
    --cc=void@manifault.com \
    --cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox