From: Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev,
song@kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com, andrii@kernel.org
Cc: sinquersw@gmail.com, kuifeng@meta.com,
Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v3 5/7] selftests/bpf: Test kptr arrays and kptrs in nested struct fields.
Date: Wed, 1 May 2024 13:47:27 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240501204729.484085-6-thinker.li@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240501204729.484085-1-thinker.li@gmail.com>
Make sure that BPF programs can declare global kptr arrays and kptr fields
in struct types that is the type of a global variable or the type of a
nested descendant field in a global variable.
An array with only one element is special case, that it treats the element
like a non-array kptr field. Nested arrays are also tested to ensure they
are handled properly.
Signed-off-by: Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@gmail.com>
---
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/cpumask.c | 5 +
.../selftests/bpf/progs/cpumask_success.c | 133 ++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 138 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/cpumask.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/cpumask.c
index ecf89df78109..2570bd4b0cb2 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/cpumask.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/cpumask.c
@@ -18,6 +18,11 @@ static const char * const cpumask_success_testcases[] = {
"test_insert_leave",
"test_insert_remove_release",
"test_global_mask_rcu",
+ "test_global_mask_array_one_rcu",
+ "test_global_mask_array_rcu",
+ "test_global_mask_array_l2_rcu",
+ "test_global_mask_nested_rcu",
+ "test_global_mask_nested_deep_rcu",
"test_cpumask_weight",
};
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/cpumask_success.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/cpumask_success.c
index 7a1e64c6c065..0b6383fa9958 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/cpumask_success.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/cpumask_success.c
@@ -12,6 +12,25 @@ char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
int pid, nr_cpus;
+struct kptr_nested {
+ struct bpf_cpumask __kptr * mask;
+};
+
+struct kptr_nested_mid {
+ int dummy;
+ struct kptr_nested m;
+};
+
+struct kptr_nested_deep {
+ struct kptr_nested_mid ptrs[2];
+};
+
+private(MASK) static struct bpf_cpumask __kptr * global_mask_array[2];
+private(MASK) static struct bpf_cpumask __kptr * global_mask_array_l2[2][1];
+private(MASK) static struct bpf_cpumask __kptr * global_mask_array_one[1];
+private(MASK) static struct kptr_nested global_mask_nested[2];
+private(MASK) static struct kptr_nested_deep global_mask_nested_deep;
+
static bool is_test_task(void)
{
int cur_pid = bpf_get_current_pid_tgid() >> 32;
@@ -460,6 +479,120 @@ int BPF_PROG(test_global_mask_rcu, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
return 0;
}
+SEC("tp_btf/task_newtask")
+int BPF_PROG(test_global_mask_array_one_rcu, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
+{
+ struct bpf_cpumask *local, *prev;
+
+ if (!is_test_task())
+ return 0;
+
+ /* Kptr arrays with one element are special cased, being treated
+ * just like a single pointer.
+ */
+
+ local = create_cpumask();
+ if (!local)
+ return 0;
+
+ prev = bpf_kptr_xchg(&global_mask_array_one[0], local);
+ if (prev) {
+ bpf_cpumask_release(prev);
+ err = 3;
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ bpf_rcu_read_lock();
+ local = global_mask_array_one[0];
+ if (!local) {
+ err = 4;
+ bpf_rcu_read_unlock();
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ bpf_rcu_read_unlock();
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int _global_mask_array_rcu(struct bpf_cpumask **mask0,
+ struct bpf_cpumask **mask1)
+{
+ struct bpf_cpumask *local;
+
+ if (!is_test_task())
+ return 0;
+
+ /* Check if two kptrs in the array work and independently */
+
+ local = create_cpumask();
+ if (!local)
+ return 0;
+
+ bpf_rcu_read_lock();
+
+ local = bpf_kptr_xchg(mask0, local);
+ if (local) {
+ err = 1;
+ goto err_exit;
+ }
+
+ /* [<mask 0>, NULL] */
+ if (!*mask0 || *mask1) {
+ err = 2;
+ goto err_exit;
+ }
+
+ local = create_cpumask();
+ if (!local) {
+ err = 9;
+ goto err_exit;
+ }
+
+ local = bpf_kptr_xchg(mask1, local);
+ if (local) {
+ err = 10;
+ goto err_exit;
+ }
+
+ /* [<mask 0>, <mask 1>] */
+ if (!*mask0 || !*mask1 || *mask0 == *mask1) {
+ err = 11;
+ goto err_exit;
+ }
+
+err_exit:
+ if (local)
+ bpf_cpumask_release(local);
+ bpf_rcu_read_unlock();
+ return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("tp_btf/task_newtask")
+int BPF_PROG(test_global_mask_array_rcu, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
+{
+ return _global_mask_array_rcu(&global_mask_array[0], &global_mask_array[1]);
+}
+
+SEC("tp_btf/task_newtask")
+int BPF_PROG(test_global_mask_array_l2_rcu, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
+{
+ return _global_mask_array_rcu(&global_mask_array_l2[0][0], &global_mask_array_l2[1][0]);
+}
+
+SEC("tp_btf/task_newtask")
+int BPF_PROG(test_global_mask_nested_rcu, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
+{
+ return _global_mask_array_rcu(&global_mask_nested[0].mask, &global_mask_nested[1].mask);
+}
+
+SEC("tp_btf/task_newtask")
+int BPF_PROG(test_global_mask_nested_deep_rcu, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
+{
+ return _global_mask_array_rcu(&global_mask_nested_deep.ptrs[0].m.mask,
+ &global_mask_nested_deep.ptrs[1].m.mask);
+}
+
SEC("tp_btf/task_newtask")
int BPF_PROG(test_cpumask_weight, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
{
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-01 20:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-01 20:47 [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/7] Enable BPF programs to declare arrays of kptr, bpf_rb_root, and bpf_list_head Kui-Feng Lee
2024-05-01 20:47 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 1/7] bpf: Remove unnecessary checks on the offset of btf_field Kui-Feng Lee
2024-05-01 20:47 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 2/7] bpf: Remove unnecessary call to btf_field_type_size() Kui-Feng Lee
2024-05-01 20:47 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 3/7] bpf: create repeated fields for arrays Kui-Feng Lee
2024-05-02 17:20 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-05-03 18:02 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2024-05-03 18:10 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-05-01 20:47 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 4/7] bpf: look into the types of the fields of a struct type recursively Kui-Feng Lee
2024-05-02 19:34 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-05-03 18:07 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2024-05-01 20:47 ` Kui-Feng Lee [this message]
2024-05-01 20:47 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 6/7] selftests/bpf: Test global bpf_rb_root arrays and fields in nested struct types Kui-Feng Lee
2024-05-01 20:47 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 7/7] selftests/bpf: Test global bpf_list_head arrays Kui-Feng Lee
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240501204729.484085-6-thinker.li@gmail.com \
--to=thinker.li@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=kuifeng@meta.com \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=sinquersw@gmail.com \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).