From: Cupertino Miranda <cupertino.miranda@oracle.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Cupertino Miranda <cupertino.miranda@oracle.com>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>,
David Faust <david.faust@oracle.com>,
Jose Marchesi <jose.marchesi@oracle.com>,
Elena Zannoni <elena.zannoni@oracle.com>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v5 1/6] bpf/verifier: replace calls to mark_reg_unknown.
Date: Mon, 6 May 2024 15:18:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240506141849.185293-2-cupertino.miranda@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240506141849.185293-1-cupertino.miranda@oracle.com>
In order to further simplify the code in adjust_scalar_min_max_vals all
the calls to mark_reg_unknown are replaced by __mark_reg_unknown.
static void mark_reg_unknown(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
struct bpf_reg_state *regs, u32 regno)
{
if (WARN_ON(regno >= MAX_BPF_REG)) {
... mark all regs not init ...
return;
}
__mark_reg_unknown(env, regs + regno);
}
The 'regno >= MAX_BPF_REG' does not apply to
adjust_scalar_min_max_vals(), because it is only called from the
following stack:
- check_alu_op
- adjust_reg_min_max_vals
- adjust_scalar_min_max_vals
The check_alu_op() does check_reg_arg() which verifies that both src and
dst register numbers are within bounds.
Signed-off-by: Cupertino Miranda <cupertino.miranda@oracle.com>
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Cc: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
Cc: David Faust <david.faust@oracle.com>
Cc: Jose Marchesi <jose.marchesi@oracle.com>
Cc: Elena Zannoni <elena.zannoni@oracle.com>
Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com>
---
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 9 ++++-----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 7360f04f9ec7..41c66cc6db80 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -13887,7 +13887,6 @@ static int adjust_scalar_min_max_vals(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
struct bpf_reg_state *dst_reg,
struct bpf_reg_state src_reg)
{
- struct bpf_reg_state *regs = cur_regs(env);
u8 opcode = BPF_OP(insn->code);
bool src_known;
s64 smin_val, smax_val;
@@ -13994,7 +13993,7 @@ static int adjust_scalar_min_max_vals(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
/* Shifts greater than 31 or 63 are undefined.
* This includes shifts by a negative number.
*/
- mark_reg_unknown(env, regs, insn->dst_reg);
+ __mark_reg_unknown(env, dst_reg);
break;
}
if (alu32)
@@ -14007,7 +14006,7 @@ static int adjust_scalar_min_max_vals(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
/* Shifts greater than 31 or 63 are undefined.
* This includes shifts by a negative number.
*/
- mark_reg_unknown(env, regs, insn->dst_reg);
+ __mark_reg_unknown(env, dst_reg);
break;
}
if (alu32)
@@ -14020,7 +14019,7 @@ static int adjust_scalar_min_max_vals(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
/* Shifts greater than 31 or 63 are undefined.
* This includes shifts by a negative number.
*/
- mark_reg_unknown(env, regs, insn->dst_reg);
+ __mark_reg_unknown(env, dst_reg);
break;
}
if (alu32)
@@ -14029,7 +14028,7 @@ static int adjust_scalar_min_max_vals(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
scalar_min_max_arsh(dst_reg, &src_reg);
break;
default:
- mark_reg_unknown(env, regs, insn->dst_reg);
+ __mark_reg_unknown(env, dst_reg);
break;
}
--
2.39.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-06 14:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-06 14:18 [PATCH bpf-next v5 0/6] bpf/verifier: range computation improvements Cupertino Miranda
2024-05-06 14:18 ` Cupertino Miranda [this message]
2024-05-06 14:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 2/6] bpf/verifier: refactor checks for range computation Cupertino Miranda
2024-05-06 14:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 3/6] bpf/verifier: improve XOR and OR " Cupertino Miranda
2024-05-06 14:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 4/6] selftests/bpf: XOR and OR range computation tests Cupertino Miranda
2024-05-06 14:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 5/6] bpf/verifier: relax MUL range computation check Cupertino Miranda
2024-05-06 14:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 6/6] selftests/bpf: MUL range computation tests Cupertino Miranda
2024-05-07 0:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 0/6] bpf/verifier: range computation improvements patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240506141849.185293-2-cupertino.miranda@oracle.com \
--to=cupertino.miranda@oracle.com \
--cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=david.faust@oracle.com \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=elena.zannoni@oracle.com \
--cc=jose.marchesi@oracle.com \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox