public inbox for bpf@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev,
	song@kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com, andrii@kernel.org,
	eddyz87@gmail.com
Cc: sinquersw@gmail.com, kuifeng@meta.com,
	Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v7 7/9] selftests/bpf: Test kptr arrays and kptrs in nested struct fields.
Date: Thu, 23 May 2024 10:42:00 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240523174202.461236-8-thinker.li@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240523174202.461236-1-thinker.li@gmail.com>

Make sure that BPF programs can declare global kptr arrays and kptr fields
in struct types that is the type of a global variable or the type of a
nested descendant field in a global variable.

An array with only one element is special case, that it treats the element
like a non-array kptr field. Nested arrays are also tested to ensure they
are handled properly.

Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@gmail.com>
---
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/cpumask.c        |   5 +
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/cpumask_success.c     | 171 ++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 176 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/cpumask.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/cpumask.c
index ecf89df78109..2570bd4b0cb2 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/cpumask.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/cpumask.c
@@ -18,6 +18,11 @@ static const char * const cpumask_success_testcases[] = {
 	"test_insert_leave",
 	"test_insert_remove_release",
 	"test_global_mask_rcu",
+	"test_global_mask_array_one_rcu",
+	"test_global_mask_array_rcu",
+	"test_global_mask_array_l2_rcu",
+	"test_global_mask_nested_rcu",
+	"test_global_mask_nested_deep_rcu",
 	"test_cpumask_weight",
 };
 
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/cpumask_success.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/cpumask_success.c
index 7a1e64c6c065..fd8106831c32 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/cpumask_success.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/cpumask_success.c
@@ -12,6 +12,31 @@ char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
 
 int pid, nr_cpus;
 
+struct kptr_nested {
+	struct bpf_cpumask __kptr * mask;
+};
+
+struct kptr_nested_pair {
+	struct bpf_cpumask __kptr * mask_1;
+	struct bpf_cpumask __kptr * mask_2;
+};
+
+struct kptr_nested_mid {
+	int dummy;
+	struct kptr_nested m;
+};
+
+struct kptr_nested_deep {
+	struct kptr_nested_mid ptrs[2];
+	struct kptr_nested_pair ptr_pairs[3];
+};
+
+private(MASK) static struct bpf_cpumask __kptr * global_mask_array[2];
+private(MASK) static struct bpf_cpumask __kptr * global_mask_array_l2[2][1];
+private(MASK) static struct bpf_cpumask __kptr * global_mask_array_one[1];
+private(MASK) static struct kptr_nested global_mask_nested[2];
+private(MASK_DEEP) static struct kptr_nested_deep global_mask_nested_deep;
+
 static bool is_test_task(void)
 {
 	int cur_pid = bpf_get_current_pid_tgid() >> 32;
@@ -460,6 +485,152 @@ int BPF_PROG(test_global_mask_rcu, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+SEC("tp_btf/task_newtask")
+int BPF_PROG(test_global_mask_array_one_rcu, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
+{
+	struct bpf_cpumask *local, *prev;
+
+	if (!is_test_task())
+		return 0;
+
+	/* Kptr arrays with one element are special cased, being treated
+	 * just like a single pointer.
+	 */
+
+	local = create_cpumask();
+	if (!local)
+		return 0;
+
+	prev = bpf_kptr_xchg(&global_mask_array_one[0], local);
+	if (prev) {
+		bpf_cpumask_release(prev);
+		err = 3;
+		return 0;
+	}
+
+	bpf_rcu_read_lock();
+	local = global_mask_array_one[0];
+	if (!local) {
+		err = 4;
+		bpf_rcu_read_unlock();
+		return 0;
+	}
+
+	bpf_rcu_read_unlock();
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int _global_mask_array_rcu(struct bpf_cpumask **mask0,
+				  struct bpf_cpumask **mask1)
+{
+	struct bpf_cpumask *local;
+
+	if (!is_test_task())
+		return 0;
+
+	/* Check if two kptrs in the array work and independently */
+
+	local = create_cpumask();
+	if (!local)
+		return 0;
+
+	bpf_rcu_read_lock();
+
+	local = bpf_kptr_xchg(mask0, local);
+	if (local) {
+		err = 1;
+		goto err_exit;
+	}
+
+	/* [<mask 0>, NULL] */
+	if (!*mask0 || *mask1) {
+		err = 2;
+		goto err_exit;
+	}
+
+	local = create_cpumask();
+	if (!local) {
+		err = 9;
+		goto err_exit;
+	}
+
+	local = bpf_kptr_xchg(mask1, local);
+	if (local) {
+		err = 10;
+		goto err_exit;
+	}
+
+	/* [<mask 0>, <mask 1>] */
+	if (!*mask0 || !*mask1 || *mask0 == *mask1) {
+		err = 11;
+		goto err_exit;
+	}
+
+err_exit:
+	if (local)
+		bpf_cpumask_release(local);
+	bpf_rcu_read_unlock();
+	return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("tp_btf/task_newtask")
+int BPF_PROG(test_global_mask_array_rcu, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
+{
+	return _global_mask_array_rcu(&global_mask_array[0], &global_mask_array[1]);
+}
+
+SEC("tp_btf/task_newtask")
+int BPF_PROG(test_global_mask_array_l2_rcu, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
+{
+	return _global_mask_array_rcu(&global_mask_array_l2[0][0], &global_mask_array_l2[1][0]);
+}
+
+SEC("tp_btf/task_newtask")
+int BPF_PROG(test_global_mask_nested_rcu, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
+{
+	return _global_mask_array_rcu(&global_mask_nested[0].mask, &global_mask_nested[1].mask);
+}
+
+/* Ensure that the field->offset has been correctly advanced from one
+ * nested struct or array sub-tree to another. In the case of
+ * kptr_nested_deep, it comprises two sub-trees: ktpr_1 and kptr_2.  By
+ * calling bpf_kptr_xchg() on every single kptr in both nested sub-trees,
+ * the verifier should reject the program if the field->offset of any kptr
+ * is incorrect.
+ *
+ * For instance, if we have 10 kptrs in a nested struct and a program that
+ * accesses each kptr individually with bpf_kptr_xchg(), the compiler
+ * should emit instructions to access 10 different offsets if it works
+ * correctly. If the field->offset values of any pair of them are
+ * incorrectly the same, the number of unique offsets in btf_record for
+ * this nested struct should be less than 10. The verifier should fail to
+ * discover some of the offsets emitted by the compiler.
+ *
+ * Even if the field->offset values of kptrs are not duplicated, the
+ * verifier should fail to find a btf_field for the instruction accessing a
+ * kptr if the corresponding field->offset is pointing to a random
+ * incorrect offset.
+ */
+SEC("tp_btf/task_newtask")
+int BPF_PROG(test_global_mask_nested_deep_rcu, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
+{
+	int r, i;
+
+	r = _global_mask_array_rcu(&global_mask_nested_deep.ptrs[0].m.mask,
+				   &global_mask_nested_deep.ptrs[1].m.mask);
+	if (r)
+		return r;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
+		r = _global_mask_array_rcu(&global_mask_nested_deep.ptr_pairs[i].mask_1,
+					   &global_mask_nested_deep.ptr_pairs[i].mask_2);
+		if (r)
+			return r;
+	}
+	return 0;
+}
+
 SEC("tp_btf/task_newtask")
 int BPF_PROG(test_cpumask_weight, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
 {
-- 
2.34.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-05-23 17:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-23 17:41 [PATCH bpf-next v7 0/9] Enable BPF programs to declare arrays of kptr, bpf_rb_root, and bpf_list_head Kui-Feng Lee
2024-05-23 17:41 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 1/9] bpf: Remove unnecessary checks on the offset of btf_field Kui-Feng Lee
2024-05-23 17:41 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 2/9] bpf: Remove unnecessary call to btf_field_type_size() Kui-Feng Lee
2024-05-23 17:41 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 3/9] bpf: refactor btf_find_struct_field() and btf_find_datasec_var() Kui-Feng Lee
2024-05-23 17:41 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 4/9] bpf: create repeated fields for arrays Kui-Feng Lee
2024-05-23 17:41 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 5/9] bpf: look into the types of the fields of a struct type recursively Kui-Feng Lee
2024-05-23 17:41 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 6/9] bpf: limit the number of levels of a nested struct type Kui-Feng Lee
2024-05-23 17:42 ` Kui-Feng Lee [this message]
2024-05-23 17:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 8/9] selftests/bpf: Test global bpf_rb_root arrays and fields in nested struct types Kui-Feng Lee
2024-05-23 17:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 9/9] selftests/bpf: Test global bpf_list_head arrays Kui-Feng Lee
2024-06-04  4:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 0/9] Enable BPF programs to declare arrays of kptr, bpf_rb_root, and bpf_list_head patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240523174202.461236-8-thinker.li@gmail.com \
    --to=thinker.li@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=kuifeng@meta.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=sinquersw@gmail.com \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox