BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"Daniel Bristot de Oliveira" <bristot@kernel.org>,
	"Boqun Feng" <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
	"Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>,
	"Frederic Weisbecker" <frederic@kernel.org>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
	"Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Waiman Long" <longman@redhat.com>,
	"Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>,
	"Alexei Starovoitov" <ast@kernel.org>,
	"Andrii Nakryiko" <andrii@kernel.org>,
	"Eduard Zingerman" <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
	"Hao Luo" <haoluo@google.com>, "Jiri Olsa" <jolsa@kernel.org>,
	"John Fastabend" <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	"KP Singh" <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
	"Martin KaFai Lau" <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
	"Song Liu" <song@kernel.org>,
	"Stanislav Fomichev" <sdf@google.com>,
	"Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@redhat.com>,
	"Yonghong Song" <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 net-next 14/15] net: Reference bpf_redirect_info via task_struct on PREEMPT_RT.
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2024 12:42:51 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240612104251.DDjnpfnq@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240611083918.fJTJJtBu@linutronix.de>

On 2024-06-11 10:39:20 [+0200], To Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> On 2024-06-11 09:55:11 [+0200], Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> > >   struct bpf_net_context {
> > >   	struct bpf_redirect_info ri;
> > >   	struct list_head cpu_map_flush_list;
> > >   	struct list_head dev_map_flush_list;
> > >   	struct list_head xskmap_map_flush_list;
> > > +	unsigned int flags;
> > 
> > Why have yet another flags variable, when we already have two flags in
> > bpf_redirect_info ?
> 
> Ah you want to fold this into ri member including the status for the
> lists? Could try. It is splitted in order to delay the initialisation of
> the lists, too. We would need to be careful to not overwrite the
> flags if `ri' is initialized after the lists. That would be the case
> with CONFIG_DEBUG_NET=y and not doing redirect (the empty list check
> initializes that).

What about this:

------>8----------

diff --git a/include/linux/filter.h b/include/linux/filter.h
index d2b4260d9d0be..c0349522de8fb 100644
--- a/include/linux/filter.h
+++ b/include/linux/filter.h
@@ -733,15 +733,22 @@ struct bpf_nh_params {
 	};
 };
 
+/* flags for bpf_redirect_info kern_flags */
+#define BPF_RI_F_RF_NO_DIRECT	BIT(0)	/* no napi_direct on return_frame */
+#define BPF_RI_F_RI_INIT	BIT(1)
+#define BPF_RI_F_CPU_MAP_INIT	BIT(2)
+#define BPF_RI_F_DEV_MAP_INIT	BIT(3)
+#define BPF_RI_F_XSK_MAP_INIT	BIT(4)
+
 struct bpf_redirect_info {
 	u64 tgt_index;
 	void *tgt_value;
 	struct bpf_map *map;
 	u32 flags;
-	u32 kern_flags;
 	u32 map_id;
 	enum bpf_map_type map_type;
 	struct bpf_nh_params nh;
+	u32 kern_flags;
 };
 
 struct bpf_net_context {
@@ -757,14 +764,7 @@ static inline struct bpf_net_context *bpf_net_ctx_set(struct bpf_net_context *bp
 
 	if (tsk->bpf_net_context != NULL)
 		return NULL;
-	memset(&bpf_net_ctx->ri, 0, sizeof(bpf_net_ctx->ri));
-
-	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL)) {
-		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&bpf_net_ctx->cpu_map_flush_list);
-		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&bpf_net_ctx->dev_map_flush_list);
-	}
-	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_XDP_SOCKETS))
-		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&bpf_net_ctx->xskmap_map_flush_list);
+	bpf_net_ctx->ri.kern_flags = 0;
 
 	tsk->bpf_net_context = bpf_net_ctx;
 	return bpf_net_ctx;
@@ -785,6 +785,11 @@ static inline struct bpf_redirect_info *bpf_net_ctx_get_ri(void)
 {
 	struct bpf_net_context *bpf_net_ctx = bpf_net_ctx_get();
 
+	if (!(bpf_net_ctx->ri.kern_flags & BPF_RI_F_RI_INIT)) {
+		memset(&bpf_net_ctx->ri, 0, offsetof(struct bpf_net_context, ri.nh));
+		bpf_net_ctx->ri.kern_flags |= BPF_RI_F_RI_INIT;
+	}
+
 	return &bpf_net_ctx->ri;
 }
 
@@ -792,6 +797,11 @@ static inline struct list_head *bpf_net_ctx_get_cpu_map_flush_list(void)
 {
 	struct bpf_net_context *bpf_net_ctx = bpf_net_ctx_get();
 
+	if (!(bpf_net_ctx->ri.kern_flags & BPF_RI_F_CPU_MAP_INIT)) {
+		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&bpf_net_ctx->cpu_map_flush_list);
+		bpf_net_ctx->ri.kern_flags |= BPF_RI_F_CPU_MAP_INIT;
+	}
+
 	return &bpf_net_ctx->cpu_map_flush_list;
 }
 
@@ -799,6 +809,11 @@ static inline struct list_head *bpf_net_ctx_get_dev_flush_list(void)
 {
 	struct bpf_net_context *bpf_net_ctx = bpf_net_ctx_get();
 
+	if (!(bpf_net_ctx->ri.kern_flags & BPF_RI_F_DEV_MAP_INIT)) {
+		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&bpf_net_ctx->dev_map_flush_list);
+		bpf_net_ctx->ri.kern_flags |= BPF_RI_F_DEV_MAP_INIT;
+	}
+
 	return &bpf_net_ctx->dev_map_flush_list;
 }
 
@@ -806,12 +821,14 @@ static inline struct list_head *bpf_net_ctx_get_xskmap_flush_list(void)
 {
 	struct bpf_net_context *bpf_net_ctx = bpf_net_ctx_get();
 
+	if (!(bpf_net_ctx->ri.kern_flags & BPF_RI_F_XSK_MAP_INIT)) {
+		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&bpf_net_ctx->xskmap_map_flush_list);
+		bpf_net_ctx->ri.kern_flags |= BPF_RI_F_XSK_MAP_INIT;
+	}
+
 	return &bpf_net_ctx->xskmap_map_flush_list;
 }
 
-/* flags for bpf_redirect_info kern_flags */
-#define BPF_RI_F_RF_NO_DIRECT	BIT(0)	/* no napi_direct on return_frame */
-
 /* Compute the linear packet data range [data, data_end) which
  * will be accessed by various program types (cls_bpf, act_bpf,
  * lwt, ...). Subsystems allowing direct data access must (!)

------>8----------

Moving kern_flags to the end excludes it from the memset() and can be
re-used for the delayed initialisation.

Sebastian

  reply	other threads:[~2024-06-12 10:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20240607070427.1379327-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de>
2024-06-07  6:53 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 11/15] lwt: Don't disable migration prio invoking BPF Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-07  6:53 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 12/15] seg6: Use nested-BH locking for seg6_bpf_srh_states Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-07  6:53 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 13/15] net: Use nested-BH locking for bpf_scratchpad Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-07  6:53 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 14/15] net: Reference bpf_redirect_info via task_struct on PREEMPT_RT Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-07 11:51   ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2024-06-10 16:50     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-11  7:55       ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2024-06-11  8:39         ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-12 10:42           ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [this message]
2024-06-07  6:53 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 15/15] net: Move per-CPU flush-lists to bpf_net_context " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240612104251.DDjnpfnq@linutronix.de \
    --to=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=bristot@kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=hawk@kernel.org \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=sdf@google.com \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=toke@redhat.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox