BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	kernel-team@fb.com, Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>,
	Zac Ecob <zacecob@protonmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf 1/3] bpf: Add missed var_off setting in set_sext32_default_val()
Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2024 10:46:26 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240615174626.3994813-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240615174621.3994321-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev>

Zac reported a verification failure and Alexei reproduced the issue
with a simple reproducer ([1]). The verification failure is due to missed
setting for var_off.

The following is the reproducer in [1]:
  0: R1=ctx() R10=fp0
  0: (71) r3 = *(u8 *)(r10 -387)        ;
     R3_w=scalar(smin=smin32=0,smax=umax=smax32=umax32=255,var_off=(0x0; 0xff)) R10=fp0
  1: (bc) w7 = (s8)w3                   ;
     R3_w=scalar(smin=smin32=0,smax=umax=smax32=umax32=255,var_off=(0x0; 0xff))
     R7_w=scalar(smin=smin32=0,smax=umax=smax32=umax32=127,var_off=(0x0; 0x7f))
  2: (36) if w7 >= 0x2533823b goto pc-3
     mark_precise: frame0: last_idx 2 first_idx 0 subseq_idx -1
     mark_precise: frame0: regs=r7 stack= before 1: (bc) w7 = (s8)w3
     mark_precise: frame0: regs=r3 stack= before 0: (71) r3 = *(u8 *)(r10 -387)
  2: R7_w=scalar(smin=smin32=0,smax=umax=smax32=umax32=127,var_off=(0x0; 0x7f))
  3: (b4) w0 = 0                        ; R0_w=0
  4: (95) exit

Note that after insn 1, the var_off for R7 is (0x0; 0x7f). This is not correct
since upper 24 bits of w7 could be 0 or 1. So correct var_off should be
(0x0; 0xffffffff). Missing var_off setting in set_sext32_default_val() caused later
incorrect analysis in zext_32_to_64(dst_reg) and reg_bounds_sync(dst_reg).

To fix the issue, set var_off correctly in set_sext32_default_val(). The correct
reg state after insn 1 becomes:
  1: (bc) w7 = (s8)w3                   ;
     R3_w=scalar(smin=smin32=0,smax=umax=smax32=umax32=255,var_off=(0x0; 0xff))
     R7_w=scalar(smin=0,smax=umax=0xffffffff,smin32=-128,smax32=127,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff))
and at insn 2, the verifier correctly determines either branch is possible.

  [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAADnVQLPU0Shz7dWV4bn2BgtGdxN3uFHPeobGBA72tpg5Xoykw@mail.gmail.com/

Fixes: 8100928c8814 ("bpf: Support new sign-extension mov insns")
Reported-by: Zac Ecob <zacecob@protonmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
---
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 010cfee7ffe9..904ef5a03cf5 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -6236,6 +6236,7 @@ static void set_sext32_default_val(struct bpf_reg_state *reg, int size)
 	}
 	reg->u32_min_value = 0;
 	reg->u32_max_value = U32_MAX;
+	reg->var_off = tnum_subreg(tnum_unknown);
 }
 
 static void coerce_subreg_to_size_sx(struct bpf_reg_state *reg, int size)
-- 
2.43.0


  reply	other threads:[~2024-06-15 17:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-06-15 17:46 [PATCH bpf 0/3] bpf: Fix missed var_off related to movsx in verifier Yonghong Song
2024-06-15 17:46 ` Yonghong Song [this message]
2024-06-15 17:46 ` [PATCH bpf 2/3] bpf: Add missed var_off setting in coerce_subreg_to_size_sx() Yonghong Song
2024-06-15 17:46 ` [PATCH bpf 3/3] selftests/bpf: Add a few tests to cover Yonghong Song
2024-06-17 17:42 ` [PATCH bpf 0/3] bpf: Fix missed var_off related to movsx in verifier Eduard Zingerman
2024-06-17 17:50 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240615174626.3994813-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    --to=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
    --cc=zacecob@protonmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox