From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from desiato.infradead.org (desiato.infradead.org [90.155.92.199]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D0FC91E4A9; Mon, 24 Jun 2024 12:46:39 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=90.155.92.199 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1719233201; cv=none; b=sJRMSog1MUDM2m3v4SN+lv7JAu7XW9wb7LxyZtr0UkCB/o82fcJjWtbcNy//oyf3lR9cGAfkHp3VW3nTdDyKDlirID9Dg7ShxBHqvaYSe0g0TekpmTQIh8zTZUAR2tPgwbfBjFHjv+KvdRoMJ/qmUGZv+N/sw3qoL/8uZa5txXU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1719233201; c=relaxed/simple; bh=x/Rav4kxZkNpPcd3LV8acvhtCDwrh/yQ32I/Xpo03Ow=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=YwJSCi+OD6lf3zTE+q+3QpOae+QyVuYAypW9fwGQvmsxuk7TGC2zlN9yMFb/8SL0vPGl6T1L9C79hjkR/hnCxFfglEj06uaI3dDiUOZiKqIIU8XdPOobdd3cqwGcRmlvyIyWeatwxcA9MPbcS8xOjmD408j6Gz0BSNJ0nY+GUUk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=infradead.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b=Kh80y12s; arc=none smtp.client-ip=90.155.92.199 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="Kh80y12s" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=desiato.20200630; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=cpFzClzAeAIEsTBtfWnHdCWGnwNHhoHvJL1XHMt4TcA=; b=Kh80y12sVLQLfaXoq16dd9rEl1 8isr7b3njLeC8CR3tp73fnZR38VoAtJpmCLCc1k4TbdMOWZB5lmecIXP0zg1eQfR2FQ0I5K2yputL xzGuSknGG126HCDy6Gdwfmt4vomYyyJzt3tHkdiVQbMUUddl0fdCVdA7dZ40MNvFOyKqoQfhUvK4R mo0WomAXB67Enh4YQjuaCwOlSxhbZZlaUq8om3pJEmsB8tNHxbpKsO8PmmG+90z9GTLXO9bUR7m9b WkA+HGg4QsFmn3ZmGgNIVCEAF9kQFj2e6VNj74WwCkeD/R4YgiVZfnSdLPZkTvI4uHsAewvr3M1FZ h5kbUWrA==; Received: from j130084.upc-j.chello.nl ([24.132.130.84] helo=noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net) by desiato.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1sLj5P-00000008FCR-00Sb; Mon, 24 Jun 2024 12:46:20 +0000 Received: by noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9E29C300754; Mon, 24 Jun 2024 14:46:18 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2024 14:46:18 +0200 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Tejun Heo Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, mingo@redhat.com, juri.lelli@redhat.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de, bristot@redhat.com, vschneid@redhat.com, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org, martin.lau@kernel.org, joshdon@google.com, brho@google.com, pjt@google.com, derkling@google.com, haoluo@google.com, dvernet@meta.com, dschatzberg@meta.com, dskarlat@cs.cmu.edu, riel@surriel.com, changwoo@igalia.com, himadrics@inria.fr, memxor@gmail.com, andrea.righi@canonical.com, joel@joelfernandes.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com, David Vernet Subject: Re: [PATCH 19/39] sched_ext: Print sched_ext info when dumping stack Message-ID: <20240624124618.GO31592@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <20240501151312.635565-1-tj@kernel.org> <20240501151312.635565-20-tj@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240501151312.635565-20-tj@kernel.org> On Wed, May 01, 2024 at 05:09:54AM -1000, Tejun Heo wrote: > +static long jiffies_delta_msecs(unsigned long at, unsigned long now) > +{ > + if (time_after(at, now)) > + return jiffies_to_msecs(at - now); > + else > + return -(long)jiffies_to_msecs(now - at); > +} You have this weird superfluous else: if () return foo; else return bar; pattern in multiple patches, please change that to: if () return foo; return bar; Throughout the series. Also, if we consider 2s complement, does the above actually make sense?