From: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org
Cc: andrii@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, martin.lau@linux.dev,
kernel-team@fb.com, yonghong.song@linux.dev,
jose.marchesi@oracle.com, Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Subject: [RFC bpf-next v1 4/8] selftests/bpf: extract utility function for BPF disassembly
Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2024 02:47:29 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240629094733.3863850-5-eddyz87@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240629094733.3863850-1-eddyz87@gmail.com>
uint32_t disasm_insn(struct bpf_insn *insn, char *buf, size_t buf_sz);
Disassembles instruction 'insn' to a text buffer 'buf'.
Removes insn->code hex prefix added by kernel disassemly routine.
Returns the length of decoded instruction (either 1 or 2).
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile | 1 +
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/disasm_helpers.c | 50 +++++++++++++
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/disasm_helpers.h | 12 ++++
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/ctx_rewrite.c | 71 +++----------------
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/testing_helpers.c | 1 +
5 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 63 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/disasm_helpers.c
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/disasm_helpers.h
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
index e0b3887b3d2d..5eb7b5eb89d2 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
@@ -636,6 +636,7 @@ TRUNNER_EXTRA_SOURCES := test_progs.c \
test_loader.c \
xsk.c \
disasm.c \
+ disasm_helpers.c \
json_writer.c \
flow_dissector_load.h \
ip_check_defrag_frags.h
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/disasm_helpers.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/disasm_helpers.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..7c29d294a456
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/disasm_helpers.c
@@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: (LGPL-2.1 OR BSD-2-Clause)
+
+#include <bpf/bpf.h>
+#include "disasm.h"
+
+struct print_insn_context {
+ char *buf;
+ size_t sz;
+};
+
+static void print_insn_cb(void *private_data, const char *fmt, ...)
+{
+ struct print_insn_context *ctx = private_data;
+ va_list args;
+
+ va_start(args, fmt);
+ vsnprintf(ctx->buf, ctx->sz, fmt, args);
+ va_end(args);
+}
+
+uint32_t disasm_insn(struct bpf_insn *insn, char *buf, size_t buf_sz)
+{
+ struct print_insn_context ctx = {
+ .buf = buf,
+ .sz = buf_sz,
+ };
+ struct bpf_insn_cbs cbs = {
+ .cb_print = print_insn_cb,
+ .private_data = &ctx,
+ };
+ int pfx_end, sfx_start, len;
+ bool double_insn;
+
+ print_bpf_insn(&cbs, insn, true);
+ /* We share code with kernel BPF disassembler, it adds '(FF) ' prefix
+ * for each instruction (FF stands for instruction `code` byte).
+ * Remove the prefix inplace, and also simplify call instructions.
+ * E.g.: "(85) call foo#10" -> "call foo".
+ */
+ pfx_end = 0;
+ sfx_start = max((int)strlen(buf) - 1, 0);
+ /* For whatever reason %n is not counted in sscanf return value */
+ sscanf(buf, "(%*[^)]) %n", &pfx_end);
+ sscanf(buf, "(%*[^)]) call %*[^#]%n", &sfx_start);
+ len = sfx_start - pfx_end;
+ memmove(buf, buf + pfx_end, len);
+ buf[len] = 0;
+ double_insn = insn->code == (BPF_LD | BPF_IMM | BPF_DW);
+ return double_insn ? 2 : 1;
+}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/disasm_helpers.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/disasm_helpers.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..db3dfe9f93dd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/disasm_helpers.h
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: (LGPL-2.1 OR BSD-2-Clause) */
+
+#ifndef __DISASM_HELPERS_H
+#define __DISASM_HELPERS_H
+
+#include <stdlib.h>
+
+struct bpf_insn;
+
+uint32_t disasm_insn(struct bpf_insn *insn, char *buf, size_t buf_sz);
+
+#endif /* __DISASM_HELPERS_H */
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/ctx_rewrite.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/ctx_rewrite.c
index 08b6391f2f56..55e41167f1f3 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/ctx_rewrite.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/ctx_rewrite.c
@@ -10,7 +10,8 @@
#include "bpf/btf.h"
#include "bpf_util.h"
#include "linux/filter.h"
-#include "disasm.h"
+#include "linux/kernel.h"
+#include "disasm_helpers.h"
#define MAX_PROG_TEXT_SZ (32 * 1024)
@@ -628,63 +629,6 @@ static bool match_pattern(struct btf *btf, char *pattern, char *text, char *reg_
return false;
}
-static void print_insn(void *private_data, const char *fmt, ...)
-{
- va_list args;
-
- va_start(args, fmt);
- vfprintf((FILE *)private_data, fmt, args);
- va_end(args);
-}
-
-/* Disassemble instructions to a stream */
-static void print_xlated(FILE *out, struct bpf_insn *insn, __u32 len)
-{
- const struct bpf_insn_cbs cbs = {
- .cb_print = print_insn,
- .cb_call = NULL,
- .cb_imm = NULL,
- .private_data = out,
- };
- bool double_insn = false;
- int i;
-
- for (i = 0; i < len; i++) {
- if (double_insn) {
- double_insn = false;
- continue;
- }
-
- double_insn = insn[i].code == (BPF_LD | BPF_IMM | BPF_DW);
- print_bpf_insn(&cbs, insn + i, true);
- }
-}
-
-/* We share code with kernel BPF disassembler, it adds '(FF) ' prefix
- * for each instruction (FF stands for instruction `code` byte).
- * This function removes the prefix inplace for each line in `str`.
- */
-static void remove_insn_prefix(char *str, int size)
-{
- const int prefix_size = 5;
-
- int write_pos = 0, read_pos = prefix_size;
- int len = strlen(str);
- char c;
-
- size = min(size, len);
-
- while (read_pos < size) {
- c = str[read_pos++];
- if (c == 0)
- break;
- str[write_pos++] = c;
- if (c == '\n')
- read_pos += prefix_size;
- }
- str[write_pos] = 0;
-}
-
struct prog_info {
char *prog_kind;
enum bpf_prog_type prog_type;
@@ -702,8 +646,10 @@ static void match_program(struct btf *btf,
struct bpf_insn *buf = NULL;
int err = 0, prog_fd = 0;
FILE *prog_out = NULL;
+ char insn_buf[64];
char *text = NULL;
__u32 cnt = 0;
+ int i;
text = calloc(MAX_PROG_TEXT_SZ, 1);
if (!text) {
@@ -739,12 +685,11 @@ static void match_program(struct btf *btf,
PRINT_FAIL("Can't open memory stream\n");
goto out;
}
- if (skip_first_insn)
- print_xlated(prog_out, buf + 1, cnt - 1);
- else
- print_xlated(prog_out, buf, cnt);
+ for (i = skip_first_insn ? 1 : 0; i < cnt;) {
+ i += disasm_insn(buf + i, insn_buf, sizeof(insn_buf));
+ fprintf(prog_out, "%s\n", insn_buf);
+ }
fclose(prog_out);
- remove_insn_prefix(text, MAX_PROG_TEXT_SZ);
ASSERT_TRUE(match_pattern(btf, pattern, text, reg_map),
pinfo->prog_kind);
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/testing_helpers.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/testing_helpers.c
index d5379a0e6da8..ac7c66f4fc7b 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/testing_helpers.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/testing_helpers.c
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
#include <errno.h>
#include <bpf/bpf.h>
#include <bpf/libbpf.h>
+#include "disasm.h"
#include "test_progs.h"
#include "testing_helpers.h"
#include <linux/membarrier.h>
--
2.45.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-29 9:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-29 9:47 [RFC bpf-next v1 0/8] no_caller_saved_registers attribute for helper calls Eduard Zingerman
2024-06-29 9:47 ` [RFC bpf-next v1 1/8] bpf: add a get_helper_proto() utility function Eduard Zingerman
2024-07-02 0:41 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-07-02 20:07 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-06-29 9:47 ` [RFC bpf-next v1 2/8] bpf: no_caller_saved_registers attribute for helper calls Eduard Zingerman
2024-07-01 19:01 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-07-02 0:41 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-07-02 20:38 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-07-02 21:09 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-07-02 21:19 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-07-02 21:22 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-07-03 11:57 ` Puranjay Mohan
2024-07-03 16:13 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-07-04 10:55 ` Puranjay Mohan
2024-06-29 9:47 ` [RFC bpf-next v1 3/8] bpf, x86: no_caller_saved_registers for bpf_get_smp_processor_id() Eduard Zingerman
2024-07-02 0:41 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-07-02 20:43 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-07-02 21:11 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-07-02 21:25 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-07-03 11:27 ` Puranjay Mohan
2024-07-03 23:14 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-07-04 11:19 ` Puranjay Mohan
2024-07-04 16:39 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-07-04 17:00 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-07-04 17:24 ` Puranjay Mohan
2024-07-04 17:39 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-06-29 9:47 ` Eduard Zingerman [this message]
2024-07-02 0:41 ` [RFC bpf-next v1 4/8] selftests/bpf: extract utility function for BPF disassembly Andrii Nakryiko
2024-07-02 20:59 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-07-02 21:16 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-07-02 21:23 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-06-29 9:47 ` [RFC bpf-next v1 5/8] selftests/bpf: no need to track next_match_pos in struct test_loader Eduard Zingerman
2024-07-02 0:41 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-07-02 21:05 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-07-02 21:18 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-06-29 9:47 ` [RFC bpf-next v1 6/8] selftests/bpf: extract test_loader->expect_msgs as a data structure Eduard Zingerman
2024-07-02 0:42 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-07-02 21:06 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-06-29 9:47 ` [RFC bpf-next v1 7/8] selftests/bpf: allow checking xlated programs in verifier_* tests Eduard Zingerman
2024-07-02 0:42 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-07-02 21:07 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-07-02 21:19 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-06-29 9:47 ` [RFC bpf-next v1 8/8] selftests/bpf: test no_caller_saved_registers spill/fill removal Eduard Zingerman
2024-07-02 0:42 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-07-02 21:12 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-07-02 21:20 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-07-02 0:41 ` [RFC bpf-next v1 0/8] no_caller_saved_registers attribute for helper calls Andrii Nakryiko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240629094733.3863850-5-eddyz87@gmail.com \
--to=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=jose.marchesi@oracle.com \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox