From: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v2 01/11] bpf: Fix atomic probe zero-extension
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2024 15:24:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240701133432.3883-2-iii@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240701133432.3883-1-iii@linux.ibm.com>
Zero-extending results of atomic probe operations fails with:
verifier bug. zext_dst is set, but no reg is defined
The problem is that insn_def_regno() handles BPF_ATOMICs, but not
BPF_PROBE_ATOMICs. Fix by adding the missing condition.
Fixes: d503a04f8bc0 ("bpf: Add support for certain atomics in bpf_arena to x86 JIT")
Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
---
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index d3927d819465..e25ad5fb9115 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -3217,7 +3217,8 @@ static int insn_def_regno(const struct bpf_insn *insn)
case BPF_ST:
return -1;
case BPF_STX:
- if (BPF_MODE(insn->code) == BPF_ATOMIC &&
+ if ((BPF_MODE(insn->code) == BPF_ATOMIC ||
+ BPF_MODE(insn->code) == BPF_PROBE_ATOMIC) &&
(insn->imm & BPF_FETCH)) {
if (insn->imm == BPF_CMPXCHG)
return BPF_REG_0;
--
2.45.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-01 13:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-01 13:24 [PATCH bpf-next v2 00/11] s390/bpf: Implement arena Ilya Leoshkevich
2024-07-01 13:24 ` Ilya Leoshkevich [this message]
2024-07-01 13:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 02/11] s390/bpf: Factor out emitting probe nops Ilya Leoshkevich
2024-07-01 13:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 03/11] s390/bpf: Get rid of get_probe_mem_regno() Ilya Leoshkevich
2024-07-01 13:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 04/11] s390/bpf: Introduce pre- and post- probe functions Ilya Leoshkevich
2024-07-01 13:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 05/11] s390/bpf: Land on the next JITed instruction after exception Ilya Leoshkevich
2024-07-01 13:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 06/11] s390/bpf: Support BPF_PROBE_MEM32 Ilya Leoshkevich
2024-07-01 13:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 07/11] s390/bpf: Support address space cast instruction Ilya Leoshkevich
2024-07-01 13:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 08/11] s390/bpf: Enable arena Ilya Leoshkevich
2024-07-01 13:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 09/11] s390/bpf: Support arena atomics Ilya Leoshkevich
2024-07-01 13:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 10/11] selftests/bpf: Add UAF tests for " Ilya Leoshkevich
2024-07-01 15:22 ` Daniel Borkmann
2024-07-01 17:02 ` Ilya Leoshkevich
2024-07-01 13:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 11/11] selftests/bpf: Remove arena tests from DENYLIST.s390x Ilya Leoshkevich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240701133432.3883-2-iii@linux.ibm.com \
--to=iii@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox