BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org
Cc: andrii@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, martin.lau@linux.dev,
	kernel-team@fb.com, yonghong.song@linux.dev, puranjay@kernel.org,
	jose.marchesi@oracle.com, Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Subject: [RFC bpf-next v2 3/9] bpf, x86, riscv, arm: no_caller_saved_registers for bpf_get_smp_processor_id()
Date: Thu,  4 Jul 2024 03:23:55 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240704102402.1644916-4-eddyz87@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240704102402.1644916-1-eddyz87@gmail.com>

The function bpf_get_smp_processor_id() is processed in a different
way, depending on the arch:
- on x86 verifier replaces call to bpf_get_smp_processor_id() with a
  sequence of instructions that modify only r0;
- on riscv64 jit replaces call to bpf_get_smp_processor_id() with a
  sequence of instructions that modify only r0;
- on arm64 jit replaces call to bpf_get_smp_processor_id() with a
  sequence of instructions that modify only r0 and tmp registers.

These rewrites satisfy attribute no_caller_saved_registers contract.
Allow rewrite of no_caller_saved_registers patterns for
bpf_get_smp_processor_id() in order to use this function as a canary
for no_caller_saved_registers tests.

Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
---
 kernel/bpf/helpers.c  |  1 +
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 11 +++++++++--
 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
index 229396172026..26863b162a88 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
@@ -158,6 +158,7 @@ const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_get_smp_processor_id_proto = {
 	.func		= bpf_get_smp_processor_id,
 	.gpl_only	= false,
 	.ret_type	= RET_INTEGER,
+	.allow_nocsr	= true,
 };
 
 BPF_CALL_0(bpf_get_numa_node_id)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index d16a249b59ad..99115c552e3b 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -16029,7 +16029,14 @@ static u8 get_helper_reg_mask(const struct bpf_func_proto *fn)
  */
 static bool verifier_inlines_helper_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, s32 imm)
 {
-	return false;
+	switch (imm) {
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
+	case BPF_FUNC_get_smp_processor_id:
+		return env->prog->jit_requested && bpf_jit_supports_percpu_insn();
+#endif
+	default:
+		return false;
+	}
 }
 
 /* If 'insn' is a call that follows no_caller_saved_registers contract
@@ -20703,7 +20710,7 @@ static int do_misc_fixups(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
 		/* Implement bpf_get_smp_processor_id() inline. */
 		if (insn->imm == BPF_FUNC_get_smp_processor_id &&
-		    prog->jit_requested && bpf_jit_supports_percpu_insn()) {
+		    verifier_inlines_helper_call(env, insn->imm)) {
 			/* BPF_FUNC_get_smp_processor_id inlining is an
 			 * optimization, so if pcpu_hot.cpu_number is ever
 			 * changed in some incompatible and hard to support
-- 
2.45.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-07-04 10:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-07-04 10:23 [RFC bpf-next v2 0/9] no_caller_saved_registers attribute for helper calls Eduard Zingerman
2024-07-04 10:23 ` [RFC bpf-next v2 1/9] bpf: add a get_helper_proto() utility function Eduard Zingerman
2024-07-09 23:42   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-07-10  0:26     ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-07-04 10:23 ` [RFC bpf-next v2 2/9] bpf: no_caller_saved_registers attribute for helper calls Eduard Zingerman
2024-07-09 23:42   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-07-10  3:00     ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-07-10  6:01       ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-07-10  7:57         ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-07-10 15:36           ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-07-10 16:15             ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-07-10 17:50               ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-07-10 18:40                 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-07-10 18:49                   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-07-10 19:03                     ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-07-10 19:16                       ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-07-10 19:07                   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-07-10 19:17                     ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-07-10 19:01             ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-07-10  9:46     ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-07-10 15:23       ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-07-10  1:09   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-07-10  3:06     ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-07-04 10:23 ` Eduard Zingerman [this message]
2024-07-04 10:23 ` [RFC bpf-next v2 4/9] selftests/bpf: extract utility function for BPF disassembly Eduard Zingerman
2024-07-09 23:46   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-07-04 10:23 ` [RFC bpf-next v2 5/9] selftests/bpf: no need to track next_match_pos in struct test_loader Eduard Zingerman
2024-07-04 10:23 ` [RFC bpf-next v2 6/9] selftests/bpf: extract test_loader->expect_msgs as a data structure Eduard Zingerman
2024-07-04 10:23 ` [RFC bpf-next v2 7/9] selftests/bpf: allow checking xlated programs in verifier_* tests Eduard Zingerman
2024-07-04 10:24 ` [RFC bpf-next v2 8/9] selftests/bpf: __arch_* macro to limit test cases to specific archs Eduard Zingerman
2024-07-09 23:50   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-07-04 10:24 ` [RFC bpf-next v2 9/9] selftests/bpf: test no_caller_saved_registers spill/fill removal Eduard Zingerman
2024-07-08 11:44 ` [RFC bpf-next v2 0/9] no_caller_saved_registers attribute for helper calls Puranjay Mohan
2024-07-08 17:29   ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-07-10  1:18 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-07-10  3:35   ` Eduard Zingerman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240704102402.1644916-4-eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --to=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=jose.marchesi@oracle.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=puranjay@kernel.org \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox