From: Michal Luczaj <mhal@rbox.co>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, john.fastabend@gmail.com,
jakub@cloudflare.com, kuniyu@amazon.com, Rao.Shoaib@oracle.com,
cong.wang@bytedance.com, Michal Luczaj <mhal@rbox.co>
Subject: [PATCH bpf v4 1/4] af_unix: Disable MSG_OOB handling for sockets in sockmap/sockhash
Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2024 21:41:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240713200218.2140950-2-mhal@rbox.co> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240713200218.2140950-1-mhal@rbox.co>
AF_UNIX socket tracks the most recent OOB packet (in its receive queue)
with an `oob_skb` pointer. BPF redirecting does not account for that: when
an OOB packet is moved between sockets, `oob_skb` is left outdated. This
results in a single skb that may be accessed from two different sockets.
Take the easy way out: silently drop MSG_OOB data targeting any socket that
is in a sockmap or a sockhash. Note that such silent drop is akin to the
fate of redirected skb's scm_fp_list (SCM_RIGHTS, SCM_CREDENTIALS).
For symmetry, forbid MSG_OOB in unix_bpf_recvmsg().
Suggested-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>
Fixes: 314001f0bf92 ("af_unix: Add OOB support")
Signed-off-by: Michal Luczaj <mhal@rbox.co>
Reviewed-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>
Reviewed-by: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>
---
net/unix/af_unix.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
net/unix/unix_bpf.c | 3 +++
2 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/unix/af_unix.c b/net/unix/af_unix.c
index 142f56770b77..11cb5badafb6 100644
--- a/net/unix/af_unix.c
+++ b/net/unix/af_unix.c
@@ -2667,10 +2667,49 @@ static struct sk_buff *manage_oob(struct sk_buff *skb, struct sock *sk,
static int unix_stream_read_skb(struct sock *sk, skb_read_actor_t recv_actor)
{
+ struct unix_sock *u = unix_sk(sk);
+ struct sk_buff *skb;
+ int err;
+
if (unlikely(READ_ONCE(sk->sk_state) != TCP_ESTABLISHED))
return -ENOTCONN;
- return unix_read_skb(sk, recv_actor);
+ mutex_lock(&u->iolock);
+ skb = skb_recv_datagram(sk, MSG_DONTWAIT, &err);
+ mutex_unlock(&u->iolock);
+ if (!skb)
+ return err;
+
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_AF_UNIX_OOB)
+ if (unlikely(skb == READ_ONCE(u->oob_skb))) {
+ bool drop = false;
+
+ unix_state_lock(sk);
+
+ if (sock_flag(sk, SOCK_DEAD)) {
+ unix_state_unlock(sk);
+ kfree_skb(skb);
+ return -ECONNRESET;
+ }
+
+ spin_lock(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock);
+ if (likely(skb == u->oob_skb)) {
+ WRITE_ONCE(u->oob_skb, NULL);
+ drop = true;
+ }
+ spin_unlock(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock);
+
+ unix_state_unlock(sk);
+
+ if (drop) {
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(skb_unref(skb));
+ kfree_skb(skb);
+ return -EAGAIN;
+ }
+ }
+#endif
+
+ return recv_actor(sk, skb);
}
static int unix_stream_read_generic(struct unix_stream_read_state *state,
diff --git a/net/unix/unix_bpf.c b/net/unix/unix_bpf.c
index bd84785bf8d6..bca2d86ba97d 100644
--- a/net/unix/unix_bpf.c
+++ b/net/unix/unix_bpf.c
@@ -54,6 +54,9 @@ static int unix_bpf_recvmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg,
struct sk_psock *psock;
int copied;
+ if (flags & MSG_OOB)
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
if (!len)
return 0;
--
2.45.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-13 20:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-13 19:41 [PATCH bpf v4 0/4] af_unix: MSG_OOB handling fix & selftest Michal Luczaj
2024-07-13 19:41 ` Michal Luczaj [this message]
2024-07-13 19:41 ` [PATCH bpf v4 2/4] selftest/bpf: Support SOCK_STREAM in unix_inet_redir_to_connected() Michal Luczaj
2024-07-13 19:41 ` [PATCH bpf v4 3/4] selftest/bpf: Parametrize AF_UNIX redir functions to accept send() flags Michal Luczaj
2024-07-16 8:56 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2024-07-13 19:41 ` [PATCH bpf v4 4/4] selftest/bpf: Test sockmap redirect for AF_UNIX MSG_OOB Michal Luczaj
2024-07-16 8:58 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2024-07-13 20:14 ` [PATCH bpf v4 0/4] af_unix: MSG_OOB handling fix & selftest Michal Luczaj
2024-07-16 8:54 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2024-07-16 20:57 ` Michal Luczaj
2024-07-16 9:12 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2024-07-17 21:00 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240713200218.2140950-2-mhal@rbox.co \
--to=mhal@rbox.co \
--cc=Rao.Shoaib@oracle.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=cong.wang@bytedance.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=jakub@cloudflare.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kuniyu@amazon.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox