From: Artem Savkov <asavkov@redhat.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
Network Development <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: fix compilation failure when CONFIG_NET_FOU!=y
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2024 14:03:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240722120315.GA3265959@alecto.usersys.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAADnVQKjgQg9Y=VxHL9jrkNdT6UKMbaFEOfjNFG_w_M=GgaRjQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Jul 19, 2024 at 10:09:35AM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 19, 2024 at 8:45 AM Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Artem,
> >
> > On 7/18/24 4:31 PM, Artem Savkov wrote:
> > > Without CONFIG_NET_FOU bpf selftests are unable to build because of
> > > missing definitions. Add ___local versions of struct bpf_fou_encap and
> > > enum bpf_fou_encap_type to fix the issue.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Artem Savkov <asavkov@redhat.com>
> >
> > This breaks BPF CI, ptal:
> >
> > https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/9999691294/job/27641198557
> >
> > [...]
> > CLNG-BPF [test_maps] btf__core_reloc_existence___wrong_field_defs.bpf.o
> > CLNG-BPF [test_maps] verifier_bswap.bpf.o
> > CLNG-BPF [test_maps] test_core_reloc_existence.bpf.o
> > CLNG-BPF [test_maps] test_global_func8.bpf.o
> > CLNG-BPF [test_maps] verifier_bitfield_write.bpf.o
> > CLNG-BPF [test_maps] local_storage_bench.bpf.o
> > CLNG-BPF [test_maps] verifier_runtime_jit.bpf.o
> > CLNG-BPF [test_maps] test_pkt_access.bpf.o
> > progs/test_tunnel_kern.c:39:5: error: conflicting types for 'bpf_skb_set_fou_encap'
> > 39 | int bpf_skb_set_fou_encap(struct __sk_buff *skb_ctx,
> > | ^
> > /tmp/work/bpf/bpf/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/tools/include/vmlinux.h:107714:12: note: previous declaration is here
> > 107714 | extern int bpf_skb_set_fou_encap(struct __sk_buff *skb_ctx, struct bpf_fou_encap *encap, int type) __weak __ksym;
> > | ^
> > progs/test_tunnel_kern.c:41:5: error: conflicting types for 'bpf_skb_get_fou_encap'
> > 41 | int bpf_skb_get_fou_encap(struct __sk_buff *skb_ctx,
> > | ^
> > /tmp/work/bpf/bpf/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/tools/include/vmlinux.h:107715:12: note: previous declaration is here
> > 107715 | extern int bpf_skb_get_fou_encap(struct __sk_buff *skb_ctx, struct bpf_fou_encap *encap) __weak __ksym;
> > | ^
> > CLNG-BPF [test_maps] verifier_typedef.bpf.o
> > CLNG-BPF [test_maps] user_ringbuf_fail.bpf.o
> > CLNG-BPF [test_maps] verifier_map_in_map.bpf.o
> > progs/test_tunnel_kern.c:782:35: error: incompatible pointer types passing 'struct bpf_fou_encap___local *' to parameter of type 'struct bpf_fou_encap *' [-Werror,-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
> > 782 | ret = bpf_skb_set_fou_encap(skb, &encap, FOU_BPF_ENCAP_GUE___local);
> > | ^~~~~~
> > /tmp/work/bpf/bpf/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/tools/include/vmlinux.h:107714:83: note: passing argument to parameter 'encap' here
> > 107714 | extern int bpf_skb_set_fou_encap(struct __sk_buff *skb_ctx, struct bpf_fou_encap *encap, int type) __weak __ksym;
>
> It's a good idea to introduce struct bpf_fou_encap___local
> for !FOU builds, but kfunc signature needs to stay and
> __local variable needs to be type casted to (struct bpf_fou_encap *)
> when calling kfunc.
Casting won't work as the compiler still have no idea about struct
bpf_fou_encap.
I think I'll need to fix this by adding '#define
BPF_NO_KDUNC_PROTOTYPES' to the test. Daniel has done this for other
cases like this in the series introducing bpftool kfunc prototype
dumping (https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1718207789.git.dxu@dxuuu.xyz/)
--
Artem
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-22 12:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-18 14:31 [PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: fix compilation failure when CONFIG_NET_FOU!=y Artem Savkov
2024-07-19 15:45 ` Daniel Borkmann
2024-07-19 17:09 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-07-19 18:44 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-07-22 6:56 ` Artem Savkov
2024-07-22 12:03 ` Artem Savkov [this message]
2024-07-22 13:52 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2] " Artem Savkov
2024-07-22 14:18 ` bot+bpf-ci
2024-07-22 19:45 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-07-23 7:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3] " Artem Savkov
2024-07-23 7:32 ` bot+bpf-ci
2024-07-23 9:44 ` Simon Horman
2024-07-23 20:21 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-07-23 20:30 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240722120315.GA3265959@alecto.usersys.redhat.com \
--to=asavkov@redhat.com \
--cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox