public inbox for bpf@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org
Cc: andrii@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, martin.lau@linux.dev,
	kernel-team@fb.com, yonghong.song@linux.dev, hffilwlqm@gmail.com,
	Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 1/4] selftests/bpf: less spam in the log for message matching
Date: Thu,  8 Aug 2024 18:05:15 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240809010518.1137758-2-eddyz87@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240809010518.1137758-1-eddyz87@gmail.com>

When running test_loader based tests in the verbose mode each matched
message leaves a trace in the stderr, e.g.:

    ./test_progs -vvv -t ...
    validate_msgs:PASS:expect_msg 0 nsec
    validate_msgs:PASS:expect_msg 0 nsec
    validate_msgs:PASS:expect_msg 0 nsec
    validate_msgs:PASS:expect_msg 0 nsec
    validate_msgs:PASS:expect_msg 0 nsec

This is not very helpful when debugging such tests and clobbers the
log a lot.

Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_loader.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_loader.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_loader.c
index 12b0c41e8d64..1b1290e090e7 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_loader.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_loader.c
@@ -531,7 +531,8 @@ static void validate_msgs(char *log_buf, struct expected_msgs *msgs,
 			}
 		}
 
-		if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(match, "expect_msg")) {
+		if (!match) {
+			PRINT_FAIL("expect_msg\n");
 			if (env.verbosity == VERBOSE_NONE)
 				emit_fn(log_buf, true /*force*/);
 			for (j = 0; j <= i; j++) {
-- 
2.45.2


  reply	other threads:[~2024-08-09  1:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-08-09  1:05 [PATCH bpf-next 0/4] __jited_x86 test tag to check x86 assembly after jit Eduard Zingerman
2024-08-09  1:05 ` Eduard Zingerman [this message]
2024-08-09  1:05 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/4] selftests/bpf: utility function to get program disassembly " Eduard Zingerman
2024-08-13 16:05   ` Yonghong Song
2024-08-13 22:01     ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-08-15 19:27   ` Yonghong Song
2024-08-15 19:34     ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-08-15 21:06   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-08-15 21:50     ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-08-15 22:04       ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-08-19 19:45     ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-08-19 21:05       ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-08-09  1:05 ` [PATCH bpf-next 3/4] selftests/bpf: __jited_x86 test tag to check x86 assembly " Eduard Zingerman
2024-08-15 21:11   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-08-15 21:48     ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-08-09  1:05 ` [PATCH bpf-next 4/4] selftests/bpf: validate jit behaviour for tail calls Eduard Zingerman
2024-08-15 21:15   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-08-15 21:42     ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-08-15 22:07       ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-08-15 22:10         ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-08-15 22:14           ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-08-15 22:19             ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-08-15 21:32   ` Yonghong Song
2024-08-15 21:47     ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-08-15 22:09       ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-08-15 22:16         ` Eduard Zingerman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240809010518.1137758-2-eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --to=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=hffilwlqm@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox