From: Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev,
andrii@kernel.org
Cc: sinquersw@gmail.com, kuifeng@meta.com,
Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@gmail.com>
Subject: [RFC bpf-next v4 6/6] selftests/bpf: test __uptr on the value of a task storage map.
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2024 12:12:13 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240816191213.35573-7-thinker.li@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240816191213.35573-1-thinker.li@gmail.com>
Make sure the memory of uptrs have been mapped to the kernel properly. Also
ensure the values of uptrs in the kernel haven't been copied to userspace.
Signed-off-by: Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@gmail.com>
---
.../bpf/prog_tests/task_local_storage.c | 106 ++++++++++++++++++
.../selftests/bpf/progs/task_ls_uptr.c | 65 +++++++++++
2 files changed, 171 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_ls_uptr.c
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/task_local_storage.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/task_local_storage.c
index c33c05161a9e..5709b083021c 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/task_local_storage.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/task_local_storage.c
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
#include <unistd.h>
#include <sched.h>
#include <pthread.h>
+#include <sys/eventfd.h>
#include <sys/syscall.h> /* For SYS_xxx definitions */
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <test_progs.h>
@@ -14,6 +15,20 @@
#include "task_ls_recursion.skel.h"
#include "task_storage_nodeadlock.skel.h"
+struct user_data {
+ int a;
+ int b;
+ int result;
+};
+
+struct value_type {
+ struct user_data *udata;
+};
+
+#define MAGIC_VALUE 0xabcd1234
+
+#include "task_ls_uptr.skel.h"
+
static void test_sys_enter_exit(void)
{
struct task_local_storage *skel;
@@ -40,6 +55,95 @@ static void test_sys_enter_exit(void)
task_local_storage__destroy(skel);
}
+static struct user_data user_data __attribute__((aligned(16))) = {
+ .a = 1,
+ .b = 2,
+};
+
+static void test_uptr(void)
+{
+ struct task_ls_uptr *skel = NULL;
+ int task_fd = -1, ev_fd = -1;
+ struct value_type value;
+ int err, wstatus;
+ __u64 dummy = 1;
+ pid_t pid;
+
+ value.udata = &user_data;
+
+ task_fd = sys_pidfd_open(getpid(), 0);
+ if (!ASSERT_NEQ(task_fd, -1, "sys_pidfd_open"))
+ goto out;
+
+ ev_fd = eventfd(0, 0);
+ if (!ASSERT_NEQ(ev_fd, -1, "eventfd"))
+ goto out;
+
+ skel = task_ls_uptr__open_and_load();
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "skel_open_and_load"))
+ goto out;
+
+ err = bpf_map_update_elem(bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.datamap), &task_fd, &value, 0);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "update_datamap"))
+ exit(1);
+
+ err = task_ls_uptr__attach(skel);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "skel_attach"))
+ goto out;
+
+ fflush(stdout);
+ fflush(stderr);
+
+ pid = fork();
+ if (pid < 0)
+ goto out;
+
+ /* Call syscall in the child process, but access the map value of
+ * the parent process in the BPF program to check if the user kptr
+ * is translated/mapped correctly.
+ */
+ if (pid == 0) {
+ /* child */
+
+ /* Overwrite the user_data in the child process to check if
+ * the BPF program accesses the user_data of the parent.
+ */
+ user_data.a = 0;
+ user_data.b = 0;
+
+ /* Wait for the parent to set child_pid */
+ read(ev_fd, &dummy, sizeof(dummy));
+
+ exit(0);
+ }
+
+ skel->bss->parent_pid = syscall(SYS_gettid);
+ skel->bss->child_pid = pid;
+
+ write(ev_fd, &dummy, sizeof(dummy));
+
+ err = waitpid(pid, &wstatus, 0);
+ ASSERT_EQ(err, pid, "waitpid");
+ skel->bss->child_pid = 0;
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(MAGIC_VALUE + user_data.a + user_data.b,
+ user_data.result, "result");
+
+ /* Check if user programs can access the value of user kptrs
+ * through bpf_map_lookup_elem(). Make sure the kernel value is not
+ * leaked.
+ */
+ err = bpf_map_lookup_elem(bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.datamap), &task_fd, &value);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_map_lookup_elem"))
+ goto out;
+ ASSERT_EQ(value.udata, NULL, "lookup_udata");
+
+out:
+ task_ls_uptr__destroy(skel);
+ close(ev_fd);
+ close(task_fd);
+}
+
static void test_exit_creds(void)
{
struct task_local_storage_exit_creds *skel;
@@ -237,4 +341,6 @@ void test_task_local_storage(void)
test_recursion();
if (test__start_subtest("nodeadlock"))
test_nodeadlock();
+ if (test__start_subtest("uptr"))
+ test_uptr();
}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_ls_uptr.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_ls_uptr.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..473e6890d522
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_ls_uptr.c
@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/* Copyright (c) 2024 Meta Platforms, Inc. and affiliates. */
+
+#include "vmlinux.h"
+#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+#include "task_kfunc_common.h"
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
+
+struct user_data {
+ int a;
+ int b;
+ int result;
+};
+
+struct value_type {
+ struct user_data __uptr *udata;
+};
+
+struct {
+ __uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_TASK_STORAGE);
+ __uint(map_flags, BPF_F_NO_PREALLOC);
+ __type(key, int);
+ __type(value, struct value_type);
+} datamap SEC(".maps");
+
+#define MAGIC_VALUE 0xabcd1234
+
+/* This is a workaround to avoid clang generating a forward reference for
+ * struct user_data. This is a known issue and will be fixed in the future.
+ */
+struct user_data __dummy;
+
+pid_t child_pid = 0;
+pid_t parent_pid = 0;
+
+SEC("tp_btf/sys_enter")
+int BPF_PROG(on_enter, struct pt_regs *regs, long id)
+{
+ struct task_struct *task, *data_task;
+ struct value_type *ptr;
+ struct user_data *udata;
+
+ task = bpf_get_current_task_btf();
+ if (task->pid != child_pid)
+ return 0;
+
+ data_task = bpf_task_from_pid(parent_pid);
+ if (!data_task)
+ return 0;
+
+ ptr = bpf_task_storage_get(&datamap, data_task, 0,
+ BPF_LOCAL_STORAGE_GET_F_CREATE);
+ bpf_task_release(data_task);
+ if (!ptr)
+ return 0;
+
+ udata = ptr->udata;
+ if (!udata)
+ return 0;
+ udata->result = MAGIC_VALUE + udata->a + udata->b;
+
+ return 0;
+}
--
2.34.1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-16 19:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-16 19:12 [RFC bpf-next v4 0/6] Share user memory to BPF program through task storage map Kui-Feng Lee
2024-08-16 19:12 ` [RFC bpf-next v4 1/6] bpf: define BPF_UPTR a new enumerator of btf_field_type Kui-Feng Lee
2024-08-16 19:12 ` [RFC bpf-next v4 2/6] bpf: Parse and support "uptr" tag Kui-Feng Lee
2024-08-16 19:12 ` [RFC bpf-next v4 3/6] bpf: Handle BPF_UPTR in verifier Kui-Feng Lee
2024-08-16 19:12 ` [RFC bpf-next v4 4/6] bpf: pin, translate, and unpin __uptr from syscalls Kui-Feng Lee
2024-08-28 23:24 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-09-04 22:21 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-09-06 20:11 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-09-06 23:44 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-09-07 1:32 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-09-07 4:03 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-08-16 19:12 ` [RFC bpf-next v4 5/6] libbpf: define __uptr Kui-Feng Lee
2024-08-27 23:13 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-08-28 17:53 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2024-08-16 19:12 ` Kui-Feng Lee [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240816191213.35573-7-thinker.li@gmail.com \
--to=thinker.li@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kuifeng@meta.com \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=sinquersw@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox