public inbox for bpf@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org
Cc: andrii@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, martin.lau@linux.dev,
	kernel-team@fb.com, yonghong.song@linux.dev,
	jose.marchesi@oracle.com, Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v2 3/5] bpf: support bpf_fastcall patterns for kfuncs
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2024 18:51:38 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240817015140.1039351-4-eddyz87@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240817015140.1039351-1-eddyz87@gmail.com>

Recognize bpf_fastcall patterns around kfunc calls.
For example, suppose bpf_cast_to_kern_ctx() follows bpf_fastcall
contract (which it does), in such a case allow verifier to rewrite BPF
program below:

  r2 = 1;
  *(u64 *)(r10 - 32) = r2;
  call %[bpf_cast_to_kern_ctx];
  r2 = *(u64 *)(r10 - 32);
  r0 = r2;

By removing the spill/fill pair:

  r2 = 1;
  call %[bpf_cast_to_kern_ctx];
  r0 = r2;

Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
---
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index b18a21bb5e6e..5dafcfff729e 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -16112,7 +16112,7 @@ static int visit_func_call_insn(int t, struct bpf_insn *insns,
  */
 static u32 helper_fastcall_clobber_mask(const struct bpf_func_proto *fn)
 {
-	u8 mask;
+	u32 mask;
 	int i;
 
 	mask = 0;
@@ -16140,6 +16140,28 @@ static bool verifier_inlines_helper_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, s32 imm)
 	}
 }
 
+/* Same as helper_fastcall_clobber_mask() but for kfuncs, see comment above */
+static u32 kfunc_fastcall_clobber_mask(struct bpf_kfunc_call_arg_meta *meta)
+{
+	const struct btf_param *params;
+	u32 vlen, i, mask;
+
+	params = btf_params(meta->func_proto);
+	vlen = btf_type_vlen(meta->func_proto);
+	mask = 0;
+	if (!btf_type_is_void(btf_type_by_id(meta->btf, meta->func_proto->type)))
+		mask |= BIT(BPF_REG_0);
+	for (i = 0; i < vlen; ++i)
+		mask |= BIT(BPF_REG_1 + i);
+	return mask;
+}
+
+/* Same as verifier_inlines_helper_call() but for kfuncs, see comment above */
+static bool is_fastcall_kfunc_call(struct bpf_kfunc_call_arg_meta *meta)
+{
+	return false;
+}
+
 /* LLVM define a bpf_fastcall function attribute.
  * This attribute means that function scratches only some of
  * the caller saved registers defined by ABI.
@@ -16237,6 +16259,19 @@ static void mark_fastcall_pattern_for_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
 				  bpf_jit_inlines_helper_call(call->imm));
 	}
 
+	if (bpf_pseudo_kfunc_call(call)) {
+		struct bpf_kfunc_call_arg_meta meta;
+		int err;
+
+		err = fetch_kfunc_meta(env, call, &meta, NULL);
+		if (err < 0)
+			/* error would be reported later */
+			return;
+
+		clobbered_regs_mask = kfunc_fastcall_clobber_mask(&meta);
+		can_be_inlined = is_fastcall_kfunc_call(&meta);
+	}
+
 	if (clobbered_regs_mask == ALL_CALLER_SAVED_REGS)
 		return;
 
-- 
2.45.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-08-17  1:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-08-17  1:51 [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/5] support bpf_fastcall patterns for calls to kfuncs Eduard Zingerman
2024-08-17  1:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/5] bpf: rename nocsr -> bpf_fastcall in verifier Eduard Zingerman
2024-08-22  1:14   ` Yonghong Song
2024-08-22  1:17   ` Yonghong Song
2024-08-22  1:43     ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-08-17  1:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/5] selftests/bpf: rename nocsr -> bpf_fastcall in selftests Eduard Zingerman
2024-08-22  1:20   ` Yonghong Song
2024-08-17  1:51 ` Eduard Zingerman [this message]
2024-08-17 20:09   ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 3/5] bpf: support bpf_fastcall patterns for kfuncs kernel test robot
2024-08-18  2:50     ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-08-22  1:23   ` Yonghong Song
2024-08-17  1:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 4/5] bpf: allow bpf_fastcall for bpf_cast_to_kern_ctx and bpf_rdonly_cast Eduard Zingerman
2024-08-22  1:23   ` Yonghong Song
2024-08-17  1:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 5/5] selftests/bpf: check if bpf_fastcall is recognized for kfuncs Eduard Zingerman
2024-08-22  1:38   ` Yonghong Song

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240817015140.1039351-4-eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --to=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=jose.marchesi@oracle.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox