From: Tze-nan Wu <Tze-nan.Wu@mediatek.com>
To: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>
Cc: <bobule.chang@mediatek.com>, <wsd_upstream@mediatek.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>,
Tze-nan Wu <Tze-nan.Wu@mediatek.com>,
Yanghui Li <yanghui.li@mediatek.com>,
Cheng-Jui Wang <cheng-jui.wang@mediatek.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>, Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>, Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: [PATCH net v4] bpf, net: Check cgroup_bpf_enabled() only once in do_sock_getsockopt()
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2024 17:30:16 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240821093016.2533-1-Tze-nan.Wu@mediatek.com> (raw)
The return value from `cgroup_bpf_enabled(CGROUP_GETSOCKOPT)` can change
between the invocations of `BPF_CGROUP_GETSOCKOPT_MAX_OPTLEN` and
`BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_GETSOCKOPT`.
If `cgroup_bpf_enabled(CGROUP_GETSOCKOPT)` changes from "false" to
"true" between the invocations of `BPF_CGROUP_GETSOCKOPT_MAX_OPTLEN` and
`BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_GETSOCKOPT`, `BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_GETSOCKOPT` will
receive an -EFAULT from `__cgroup_bpf_run_filter_getsockopt(max_optlen=0)`
due to `get_user()` was not reached in `BPF_CGROUP_GETSOCKOPT_MAX_OPTLEN`.
Scenario shown as below:
`process A` `process B`
----------- ------------
BPF_CGROUP_GETSOCKOPT_MAX_OPTLEN
enable CGROUP_GETSOCKOPT
BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_GETSOCKOPT (-EFAULT)
To prevent this, invoke `cgroup_bpf_enabled()` only once and cache the
result in a newly added local variable `enabled`.
Both `BPF_CGROUP_*` macros in `do_sock_getsockopt` will then check their
condition using the same `enabled` variable as the condition variable,
instead of using the return values from `cgroup_bpf_enabled` called by
themselves as the condition variable(which could yield different results).
This ensures that either both `BPF_CGROUP_*` macros pass the condition
or neither does.
Fixes: 0d01da6afc54 ("bpf: implement getsockopt and setsockopt hooks")
Co-developed-by: Yanghui Li <yanghui.li@mediatek.com>
Signed-off-by: Yanghui Li <yanghui.li@mediatek.com>
Co-developed-by: Cheng-Jui Wang <cheng-jui.wang@mediatek.com>
Signed-off-by: Cheng-Jui Wang <cheng-jui.wang@mediatek.com>
Signed-off-by: Tze-nan Wu <Tze-nan.Wu@mediatek.com>
---
Chagnes from v1 to v2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240819082513.27176-1-Tze-nan.Wu@mediatek.com/
Instead of using cgroup_lock in the fastpath, invoke cgroup_bpf_enabled
only once and cache the value in the newly added variable `enabled`.
`BPF_CGROUP_*` macros in do_sock_getsockopt can then both check their
condition with the new variable `enable`, ensuring that either they both
passing the condition or both do not.
Chagnes from v2 to v3: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240819155627.1367-1-Tze-nan.Wu@mediatek.com/
Hide cgroup_bpf_enabled in the macro, and some modifications to adapt
the coding style.
Chagnes from v3 to v4: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240820092942.16654-1-Tze-nan.Wu@mediatek.com/
Add bpf tag to subject, and Fixes tag in body.
---
include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h | 15 ++++++++-------
net/socket.c | 5 +++--
2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h b/include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h
index fb3c3e7181e6..5afa2ac76aae 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h
@@ -390,20 +390,20 @@ static inline bool cgroup_bpf_sock_enabled(struct sock *sk,
__ret; \
})
-#define BPF_CGROUP_GETSOCKOPT_MAX_OPTLEN(optlen) \
+#define BPF_CGROUP_GETSOCKOPT_MAX_OPTLEN(optlen, enabled) \
({ \
int __ret = 0; \
- if (cgroup_bpf_enabled(CGROUP_GETSOCKOPT)) \
+ enabled = cgroup_bpf_enabled(CGROUP_GETSOCKOPT); \
+ if (enabled) \
copy_from_sockptr(&__ret, optlen, sizeof(int)); \
__ret; \
})
#define BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_GETSOCKOPT(sock, level, optname, optval, optlen, \
- max_optlen, retval) \
+ max_optlen, retval, enabled) \
({ \
int __ret = retval; \
- if (cgroup_bpf_enabled(CGROUP_GETSOCKOPT) && \
- cgroup_bpf_sock_enabled(sock, CGROUP_GETSOCKOPT)) \
+ if (enabled && cgroup_bpf_sock_enabled(sock, CGROUP_GETSOCKOPT)) \
if (!(sock)->sk_prot->bpf_bypass_getsockopt || \
!INDIRECT_CALL_INET_1((sock)->sk_prot->bpf_bypass_getsockopt, \
tcp_bpf_bypass_getsockopt, \
@@ -518,9 +518,10 @@ static inline int bpf_percpu_cgroup_storage_update(struct bpf_map *map,
#define BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_SOCK_OPS(sock_ops) ({ 0; })
#define BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_DEVICE_CGROUP(atype, major, minor, access) ({ 0; })
#define BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_SYSCTL(head,table,write,buf,count,pos) ({ 0; })
-#define BPF_CGROUP_GETSOCKOPT_MAX_OPTLEN(optlen) ({ 0; })
+#define BPF_CGROUP_GETSOCKOPT_MAX_OPTLEN(optlen, enabled) ({ 0; })
#define BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_GETSOCKOPT(sock, level, optname, optval, \
- optlen, max_optlen, retval) ({ retval; })
+ optlen, max_optlen, retval, \
+ enabled) ({ retval; })
#define BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_GETSOCKOPT_KERN(sock, level, optname, optval, \
optlen, retval) ({ retval; })
#define BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_SETSOCKOPT(sock, level, optname, optval, optlen, \
diff --git a/net/socket.c b/net/socket.c
index fcbdd5bc47ac..0b465dc8a789 100644
--- a/net/socket.c
+++ b/net/socket.c
@@ -2363,6 +2363,7 @@ int do_sock_getsockopt(struct socket *sock, bool compat, int level,
int optname, sockptr_t optval, sockptr_t optlen)
{
int max_optlen __maybe_unused;
+ bool enabled __maybe_unused;
const struct proto_ops *ops;
int err;
@@ -2371,7 +2372,7 @@ int do_sock_getsockopt(struct socket *sock, bool compat, int level,
return err;
if (!compat)
- max_optlen = BPF_CGROUP_GETSOCKOPT_MAX_OPTLEN(optlen);
+ max_optlen = BPF_CGROUP_GETSOCKOPT_MAX_OPTLEN(optlen, enabled);
ops = READ_ONCE(sock->ops);
if (level == SOL_SOCKET) {
@@ -2390,7 +2391,7 @@ int do_sock_getsockopt(struct socket *sock, bool compat, int level,
if (!compat)
err = BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_GETSOCKOPT(sock->sk, level, optname,
optval, optlen, max_optlen,
- err);
+ err, enabled);
return err;
}
--
2.45.2
next reply other threads:[~2024-08-21 9:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-21 9:30 Tze-nan Wu [this message]
2024-08-21 18:44 ` [PATCH net v4] bpf, net: Check cgroup_bpf_enabled() only once in do_sock_getsockopt() Yonghong Song
2024-08-22 3:28 ` Tze-nan Wu (吳澤南)
2024-08-21 21:01 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-08-22 3:16 ` Tze-nan Wu (吳澤南)
2024-08-22 7:01 ` Tze-nan Wu (吳澤南)
2024-08-22 16:00 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-08-24 2:04 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2024-08-29 12:44 ` Tze-nan Wu (吳澤南)
2024-08-29 16:27 ` Alexei Starovoitov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240821093016.2533-1-Tze-nan.Wu@mediatek.com \
--to=tze-nan.wu@mediatek.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bobule.chang@mediatek.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=cheng-jui.wang@mediatek.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kuniyu@amazon.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=wsd_upstream@mediatek.com \
--cc=yanghui.li@mediatek.com \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox