BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org
Cc: andrii@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, martin.lau@linux.dev,
	kernel-team@fb.com, yonghong.song@linux.dev,
	Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: use simply-expanded variables for libpcap flags
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2024 12:44:09 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240823194409.774815-1-eddyz87@gmail.com> (raw)

Save pkg-config output for libpcap as simply-expanded variables.
For an obscure reason 'shell' call in LDLIBS/CFLAGS recursively
expanded variables makes *.test.o files compilation non-parallel
when make is executed with -j option.

While at it, reuse 'pkg-config --cflags' call to define
-DTRAFFIC_MONITOR=1 option, it's exit status is the same as for
'pkg-config --exists'.

Fixes: f52403b6bfea ("selftests/bpf: Add traffic monitor functions.")
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile | 7 ++++---
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
index ec7d425c4022..c120617b64ad 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
@@ -48,9 +48,10 @@ CFLAGS += -g $(OPT_FLAGS) -rdynamic					\
 LDFLAGS += $(SAN_LDFLAGS)
 LDLIBS += $(LIBELF_LIBS) -lz -lrt -lpthread
 
-LDLIBS += $(shell $(PKG_CONFIG) --libs libpcap 2>/dev/null)
-CFLAGS += $(shell $(PKG_CONFIG) --cflags libpcap 2>/dev/null)
-CFLAGS += $(shell $(PKG_CONFIG) --exists libpcap 2>/dev/null && echo "-DTRAFFIC_MONITOR=1")
+PCAP_CFLAGS	:= $(shell $(PKG_CONFIG) --cflags libpcap 2>/dev/null && echo "-DTRAFFIC_MONITOR=1")
+PCAP_LIBS	:= $(shell $(PKG_CONFIG) --libs libpcap 2>/dev/null)
+LDLIBS += $(PCAP_LIBS)
+CFLAGS += $(PCAP_CFLAGS)
 
 # The following tests perform type punning and they may break strict
 # aliasing rules, which are exploited by both GCC and clang by default
-- 
2.46.0


             reply	other threads:[~2024-08-23 19:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-08-23 19:44 Eduard Zingerman [this message]
2024-08-23 19:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: use simply-expanded variables for libpcap flags Eduard Zingerman
2024-08-23 22:30 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240823194409.774815-1-eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --to=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox