BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org,
	toke@redhat.com, martin.lau@kernel.org, yonghong.song@linux.dev,
	puranjay@kernel.org, xukuohai@huaweicloud.com, eddyz87@gmail.com,
	iii@linux.ibm.com, leon.hwang@linux.dev,
	kernel-patches-bot@fb.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 3/4] selftests/bpf: Add testcases for another tailcall infinite loop fixing
Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2024 21:09:42 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240825130943.7738-4-leon.hwang@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240825130943.7738-1-leon.hwang@linux.dev>

The issue has been fixed on both x64 and arm64.

On x64:

cd tools/testing/selftests/bpf; ./test_progs -t tailcalls
333/26  tailcalls/tailcall_bpf2bpf_freplace:OK
333/27  tailcalls/tailcall_bpf2bpf_hierarchy_freplace_1:OK
333/28  tailcalls/tailcall_bpf2bpf_hierarchy_freplace_2:OK
333/29  tailcalls/tailcall_bpf2bpf_hierarchy_freplace_3:OK
333/30  tailcalls/tailcall_bpf2bpf_hierarchy_freplace_4:OK
333/31  tailcalls/tailcall_bpf2bpf_hierarchy_freplace_5:OK
333     tailcalls:OK
Summary: 1/31 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

on arm64:

cd tools/testing/selftests/bpf; ./test_progs -t tailcalls
333/26  tailcalls/tailcall_bpf2bpf_freplace:OK
333/27  tailcalls/tailcall_bpf2bpf_hierarchy_freplace_1:OK
333/28  tailcalls/tailcall_bpf2bpf_hierarchy_freplace_2:OK
333/29  tailcalls/tailcall_bpf2bpf_hierarchy_freplace_3:OK
333/30  tailcalls/tailcall_bpf2bpf_hierarchy_freplace_4:OK
333/31  tailcalls/tailcall_bpf2bpf_hierarchy_freplace_5:OK
333     tailcalls:OK
Summary: 1/31 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
---
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tailcalls.c      | 209 +++++++++++++++++-
 .../tailcall_bpf2bpf_hierarchy_freplace.c     |  30 +++
 .../testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tc_bpf2bpf.c  |  18 +-
 3 files changed, 253 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall_bpf2bpf_hierarchy_freplace.c

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tailcalls.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tailcalls.c
index 21c5a37846ade..5df6721da3c51 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tailcalls.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tailcalls.c
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
 #include "tailcall_poke.skel.h"
 #include "tailcall_bpf2bpf_hierarchy2.skel.h"
 #include "tailcall_bpf2bpf_hierarchy3.skel.h"
+#include "tailcall_bpf2bpf_hierarchy_freplace.skel.h"
 #include "tailcall_freplace.skel.h"
 #include "tc_bpf2bpf.skel.h"
 
@@ -1525,7 +1526,8 @@ static void test_tailcall_freplace(void)
 
 	prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(tc_skel->progs.entry_tc);
 	freplace_prog = freplace_skel->progs.entry_freplace;
-	err = bpf_program__set_attach_target(freplace_prog, prog_fd, "subprog");
+	err = bpf_program__set_attach_target(freplace_prog, prog_fd,
+					     "subprog_tc");
 	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "set_attach_target"))
 		goto out;
 
@@ -1534,7 +1536,7 @@ static void test_tailcall_freplace(void)
 		goto out;
 
 	freplace_link = bpf_program__attach_freplace(freplace_prog, prog_fd,
-						     "subprog");
+						     "subprog_tc");
 	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(freplace_link, "attach_freplace"))
 		goto out;
 
@@ -1556,6 +1558,197 @@ static void test_tailcall_freplace(void)
 	tailcall_freplace__destroy(freplace_skel);
 }
 
+/* test_tailcall_bpf2bpf_freplace checks that the count value of the tail
+ * call limit enforcement matches with expectation for this case:
+ *
+ * entry_tc --> subprog_tc --jump-> entry_freplace --tailcall-> entry_tc
+ */
+static void test_tailcall_bpf2bpf_freplace(void)
+{
+	struct tailcall_freplace *freplace_skel = NULL;
+	struct bpf_link *freplace_link = NULL;
+	struct tc_bpf2bpf *tc_skel = NULL;
+	char buff[128] = {};
+	int prog_fd, map_fd;
+	int err, i;
+
+	LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_test_run_opts, topts,
+		    .data_in = buff,
+		    .data_size_in = sizeof(buff),
+		    .repeat = 1,
+	);
+
+	tc_skel = tc_bpf2bpf__open_and_load();
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(tc_skel, "tc_bpf2bpf__open_and_load"))
+		goto out;
+
+	prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(tc_skel->progs.entry_tc);
+	freplace_skel = tailcall_freplace__open();
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(freplace_skel, "tailcall_freplace__open"))
+		goto out;
+
+	err = bpf_program__set_attach_target(freplace_skel->progs.entry_freplace,
+					     prog_fd, "subprog_tc");
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "set_attach_target"))
+		goto out;
+
+	err = tailcall_freplace__load(freplace_skel);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "tailcall_freplace__load"))
+		goto out;
+
+	i = 0;
+	map_fd = bpf_map__fd(freplace_skel->maps.jmp_table);
+	err = bpf_map_update_elem(map_fd, &i, &prog_fd, BPF_ANY);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "update jmp_table"))
+		goto out;
+
+	freplace_link = bpf_program__attach_freplace(freplace_skel->progs.entry_freplace,
+						     prog_fd, "subprog_tc");
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(freplace_link, "attach_freplace"))
+		goto out;
+
+	err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(prog_fd, &topts);
+	ASSERT_OK(err, "test_run_opts");
+	ASSERT_EQ(topts.retval, 34, "test_run_opts retval");
+
+out:
+	bpf_link__destroy(freplace_link);
+	tailcall_freplace__destroy(freplace_skel);
+	tc_bpf2bpf__destroy(tc_skel);
+}
+
+static void test_tailcall_bpf2bpf_hierarchy_freplace(bool freplace_subprog,
+						     bool tailcall_tc,
+						     bool target_entry2,
+						     int tail_call_cnt1,
+						     int tail_call_cnt2)
+{
+	struct tailcall_bpf2bpf_hierarchy_freplace *freplace_skel = NULL;
+	struct bpf_link *freplace_link = NULL;
+	int freplace_prog_fd, prog_fd, map_fd;
+	struct tc_bpf2bpf *tc_skel = NULL;
+	char buff[128] = {};
+	int err, i, val;
+
+	LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_test_run_opts, topts,
+		    .data_in = buff,
+		    .data_size_in = sizeof(buff),
+		    .repeat = 1,
+	);
+
+	tc_skel = tc_bpf2bpf__open_and_load();
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(tc_skel, "tc_bpf2bpf__open_and_load"))
+		goto out;
+
+	prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(target_entry2 ? tc_skel->progs.entry_tc_2 :
+				  tc_skel->progs.entry_tc);
+	freplace_skel = tailcall_bpf2bpf_hierarchy_freplace__open();
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(freplace_skel, "tailcall_bpf2bpf_hierarchy_freplace__open"))
+		goto out;
+
+	err = bpf_program__set_attach_target(freplace_skel->progs.entry_freplace,
+					     prog_fd, freplace_subprog ?
+					     "subprog_tc" : "entry_tc");
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "set_attach_target"))
+		goto out;
+
+	err = tailcall_bpf2bpf_hierarchy_freplace__load(freplace_skel);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "tailcall_bpf2bpf_hierarchy_freplace__load"))
+		goto out;
+
+	freplace_prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(freplace_skel->progs.entry_freplace);
+	map_fd = bpf_map__fd(freplace_skel->maps.jmp_table);
+	val = tailcall_tc ? prog_fd : freplace_prog_fd;
+	i = 0;
+	err = bpf_map_update_elem(map_fd, &i, &val, BPF_ANY);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "update jmp_table"))
+		goto out;
+
+	freplace_link = bpf_program__attach_freplace(freplace_skel->progs.entry_freplace,
+						     prog_fd, freplace_subprog ?
+						     "subprog_tc" : "entry_tc");
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(freplace_link, "attach_freplace"))
+		goto out;
+
+	err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(prog_fd, &topts);
+	ASSERT_OK(err, "test_run_opts");
+	ASSERT_EQ(topts.retval, tail_call_cnt1, "test_run_opts retval");
+
+	i = 0;
+	err = bpf_map_delete_elem(map_fd, &i);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "delete_elem from jmp_table"))
+		goto out;
+
+	err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(prog_fd, &topts);
+	ASSERT_OK(err, "test_run_opts again");
+	ASSERT_EQ(topts.retval, tail_call_cnt2, "test_run_opts retval again");
+
+out:
+	bpf_link__destroy(freplace_link);
+	tailcall_bpf2bpf_hierarchy_freplace__destroy(freplace_skel);
+	tc_bpf2bpf__destroy(tc_skel);
+}
+
+/* test_tailcall_bpf2bpf_hierarchy_freplace_1 checks the count value of tail
+ * call limit enforcement matches with expectation for this case:
+ *
+ *                                    subprog_tail --tailcall-> entry_freplace
+ * entry_tc --jump-> entry_freplace <
+ *                                    subprog_tail --tailcall-> entry_freplace
+ */
+static void test_tailcall_bpf2bpf_hierarchy_freplace_1(void)
+{
+	test_tailcall_bpf2bpf_hierarchy_freplace(false, false, false, 34, 35);
+}
+
+/* test_tailcall_bpf2bpf_hierarchy_freplace_2 checks the count value of tail
+ * call limit enforcement matches with expectation for this case:
+ *
+ *                                                   subprog_tail --tailcall-> entry_freplace
+ * entry_tc --> subprog_tc --jump-> entry_freplace <
+ *                                                   subprog_tail --tailcall-> entry_freplace
+ */
+static void test_tailcall_bpf2bpf_hierarchy_freplace_2(void)
+{
+	test_tailcall_bpf2bpf_hierarchy_freplace(true, false, false, 34, 35);
+}
+
+/* test_tailcall_bpf2bpf_hierarchy_freplace_3 checks the count value of tail
+ * call limit enforcement matches with expectation for this case:
+ *
+ *                                                   subprog_tail --tailcall-> entry_tc
+ * entry_tc --> subprog_tc --jump-> entry_freplace <
+ *                                                   subprog_tail --tailcall-> entry_tc
+ */
+static void test_tailcall_bpf2bpf_hierarchy_freplace_3(void)
+{
+	test_tailcall_bpf2bpf_hierarchy_freplace(true, true, false, 34, 35);
+}
+
+/* test_tailcall_bpf2bpf_hierarchy_freplace_4 checks the count value of tail
+ * call limit enforcement matches with expectation for this case:
+ *
+ *                                                                     subprog_tail --tailcall-> entry_freplace
+ * entry_tc_2 --> subprog_tc (call 10 times) --jump-> entry_freplace <
+ *                                                                     subprog_tail --tailcall-> entry_freplace
+ */
+static void test_tailcall_bpf2bpf_hierarchy_freplace_4(void)
+{
+	test_tailcall_bpf2bpf_hierarchy_freplace(true, false, true, 43, 53);
+}
+
+/* test_tailcall_bpf2bpf_hierarchy_freplace_5 checks the count value of tail
+ * call limit enforcement matches with expectation for this case:
+ *
+ *                                                                     subprog_tail --tailcall-> entry_tc_2
+ * entry_tc_2 --> subprog_tc (call 10 times) --jump-> entry_freplace <
+ *                                                                     subprog_tail --tailcall-> entry_tc_2
+ */
+static void test_tailcall_bpf2bpf_hierarchy_freplace_5(void)
+{
+	test_tailcall_bpf2bpf_hierarchy_freplace(true, true, true, 340, 350);
+}
+
 void test_tailcalls(void)
 {
 	if (test__start_subtest("tailcall_1"))
@@ -1606,4 +1799,16 @@ void test_tailcalls(void)
 	test_tailcall_bpf2bpf_hierarchy_3();
 	if (test__start_subtest("tailcall_freplace"))
 		test_tailcall_freplace();
+	if (test__start_subtest("tailcall_bpf2bpf_freplace"))
+		test_tailcall_bpf2bpf_freplace();
+	if (test__start_subtest("tailcall_bpf2bpf_hierarchy_freplace_1"))
+		test_tailcall_bpf2bpf_hierarchy_freplace_1();
+	if (test__start_subtest("tailcall_bpf2bpf_hierarchy_freplace_2"))
+		test_tailcall_bpf2bpf_hierarchy_freplace_2();
+	if (test__start_subtest("tailcall_bpf2bpf_hierarchy_freplace_3"))
+		test_tailcall_bpf2bpf_hierarchy_freplace_3();
+	if (test__start_subtest("tailcall_bpf2bpf_hierarchy_freplace_4"))
+		test_tailcall_bpf2bpf_hierarchy_freplace_4();
+	if (test__start_subtest("tailcall_bpf2bpf_hierarchy_freplace_5"))
+		test_tailcall_bpf2bpf_hierarchy_freplace_5();
 }
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall_bpf2bpf_hierarchy_freplace.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall_bpf2bpf_hierarchy_freplace.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000..6f7c1fac9ddb7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall_bpf2bpf_hierarchy_freplace.c
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+#include <linux/bpf.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+
+struct {
+	__uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_PROG_ARRAY);
+	__uint(max_entries, 1);
+	__uint(key_size, sizeof(__u32));
+	__uint(value_size, sizeof(__u32));
+} jmp_table SEC(".maps");
+
+int count = 0;
+
+static __noinline
+int subprog_tail(struct __sk_buff *skb)
+{
+	bpf_tail_call_static(skb, &jmp_table, 0);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("freplace")
+int entry_freplace(struct __sk_buff *skb)
+{
+	count++;
+	subprog_tail(skb);
+	subprog_tail(skb);
+	return count;
+}
+
+char __license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tc_bpf2bpf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tc_bpf2bpf.c
index 8a0632c37839a..4f8263f634c9c 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tc_bpf2bpf.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tc_bpf2bpf.c
@@ -5,10 +5,11 @@
 #include "bpf_misc.h"
 
 __noinline
-int subprog(struct __sk_buff *skb)
+int subprog_tc(struct __sk_buff *skb)
 {
 	int ret = 1;
 
+	__sink(skb);
 	__sink(ret);
 	return ret;
 }
@@ -16,7 +17,20 @@ int subprog(struct __sk_buff *skb)
 SEC("tc")
 int entry_tc(struct __sk_buff *skb)
 {
-	return subprog(skb);
+	return subprog_tc(skb);
+}
+
+SEC("tc")
+int entry_tc_2(struct __sk_buff *skb)
+{
+	int ret, i;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
+		ret = subprog_tc(skb);
+		__sink(ret);
+	}
+
+	return ret;
 }
 
 char __license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
-- 
2.44.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-08-25 13:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-08-25 13:09 [PATCH bpf-next 0/4] bpf: Fix tailcall infinite loop caused by freplace Leon Hwang
2024-08-25 13:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/4] bpf, x64: " Leon Hwang
2024-08-27 10:37   ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-08-27 12:48     ` Leon Hwang
2024-08-27 20:50       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-08-28  2:36         ` Leon Hwang
2024-08-28 16:01           ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-08-29  2:14             ` Leon Hwang
2024-09-02 10:19         ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2024-09-02 16:33           ` Vincent Li
2024-08-25 13:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/4] bpf, arm64: " Leon Hwang
2024-08-26 14:32   ` Xu Kuohai
2024-08-27  2:23     ` Leon Hwang
2024-08-30  7:37       ` Xu Kuohai
2024-08-30  9:08         ` Leon Hwang
2024-08-30 10:00           ` Xu Kuohai
2024-08-30 12:11             ` Leon Hwang
2024-08-30 16:03               ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-09-05  9:13         ` Puranjay Mohan
2024-09-06 14:32           ` Leon Hwang
2024-09-06 15:24             ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-09-07  7:03               ` Xu Kuohai
2024-08-25 13:09 ` Leon Hwang [this message]
2024-08-25 13:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next 4/4] selftests/bpf: Fix verifier tailcall jit selftest Leon Hwang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240825130943.7738-4-leon.hwang@linux.dev \
    --to=leon.hwang@linux.dev \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=iii@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kernel-patches-bot@fb.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
    --cc=puranjay@kernel.org \
    --cc=toke@redhat.com \
    --cc=xukuohai@huaweicloud.com \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox