From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E5F5214A088; Tue, 10 Sep 2024 18:40:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1725993616; cv=none; b=I0tZTPoRen4B6uFVkrP2BCbffOID/pumHw2eqKY0hb0ehZBhrTXvWZw7YK3F6qvcRzkz/Ed2vgMIM5hR0sY12MaGv/VZKfFOg0Q8ByJTkLE6AGizKvV8ggIIKkQBTzSglFK212Z6OE+ADSyOhzTs6LCKDIPHKu6gMAe0+ByxvtY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1725993616; c=relaxed/simple; bh=fzhPJFooZn6ziiB8dUyp4xNuOymY0Ow5XTpP8LzxOr4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=gvL3KE38lQ5vi7bQvOxM/OTKYeONk07yTKZermtzYqHo96uqeiT6+bbtKTKbHKQyZHOaYU7+HRbMj+hr3rhwYjIWnHjvkOrEWrOt1woMIkiBxuk8Q5Md18+N2LG38SlwadWLJkciy3h8ACOhJiNPN95WFaIl6K5B5mLa2S5A7Gs= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EAD08C4CEC3; Tue, 10 Sep 2024 18:40:13 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2024 14:40:15 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt To: Andrii Nakryiko Cc: Masami Hiramatsu , bpf , Linux trace kernel , adubey@linux.ibm.com, "Naveen N. Rao" , KP Singh , linux-arm-kernel , Mark Rutland , Will Deacon , Alexei Starovoitov , Catalin Marinas , Florent Revest , Puranjay Mohan Subject: Re: Unsupported CONFIG_FPROBE and CONFIG_RETHOOK on ARM64 Message-ID: <20240910144015.643dc6da@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.20.0git84 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 10 Sep 2024 11:23:29 -0700 Andrii Nakryiko wrote: > Masami, Steven, > > Does Linus have to be in CC to get any reply here? Come on, it's been > almost a full week. And we are busy getting ready for Plumbers. Go ahead Cc Linus, I'm sure he doesn't care, and you will likely just annoy him unless this is a regression. > > Maybe ARM64 folks have some context?... And hopefully desire to see > this through so that ARM64 doesn't stick out as a lesser-supported > platform as far as tracing goes compared to loongarch, s390x, and > powerpc (which just landed rethook support, see [2]). > > Note that there was already an implementation (see [1]), but for some > reason it never made it. > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/164338038439.2429999.17564843625400931820.stgit@devnote2/ > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/172562357215.467568.2172858907419105155.b4-ty@ellerman.id.au/ Masami's fprobe work is near the top of my priority list, but there's been bugs reported that always take precedence over features. There's been fires to put out that has caused this to be delayed. There! I replied. -- Steve