BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>,
	Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	KP Singh <kpsingh@chromium.org>,
	Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>, Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCHv5 bpf-next 13/13] selftests/bpf: Add uprobe sessions to consumer test
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2024 22:57:17 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240929205717.3813648-14-jolsa@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240929205717.3813648-1-jolsa@kernel.org>

Adding uprobe session consumers to the consumer test,
so we get the session into the test mix.

Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
---
 .../bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_multi_test.c        | 63 ++++++++++++++-----
 .../bpf/progs/uprobe_multi_consumers.c        | 16 ++++-
 2 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_multi_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_multi_test.c
index 7e0228f8fcfc..b43107e87e78 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_multi_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_multi_test.c
@@ -765,6 +765,10 @@ get_program(struct uprobe_multi_consumers *skel, int prog)
 		return skel->progs.uprobe_2;
 	case 3:
 		return skel->progs.uprobe_3;
+	case 4:
+		return skel->progs.uprobe_4;
+	case 5:
+		return skel->progs.uprobe_5;
 	default:
 		ASSERT_FAIL("get_program");
 		return NULL;
@@ -783,6 +787,10 @@ get_link(struct uprobe_multi_consumers *skel, int link)
 		return &skel->links.uprobe_2;
 	case 3:
 		return &skel->links.uprobe_3;
+	case 4:
+		return &skel->links.uprobe_4;
+	case 5:
+		return &skel->links.uprobe_5;
 	default:
 		ASSERT_FAIL("get_link");
 		return NULL;
@@ -801,8 +809,10 @@ static int uprobe_attach(struct uprobe_multi_consumers *skel, int idx)
 	/*
 	 * bit/prog: 0,1 uprobe entry
 	 * bit/prog: 2,3 uprobe return
+	 * bit/prog: 4,5 uprobe session
 	 */
 	opts.retprobe = idx == 2 || idx == 3;
+	opts.session  = idx == 4 || idx == 5;
 
 	*link = bpf_program__attach_uprobe_multi(prog, 0, "/proc/self/exe",
 						"uprobe_consumer_test",
@@ -832,13 +842,13 @@ uprobe_consumer_test(struct uprobe_multi_consumers *skel,
 	int idx;
 
 	/* detach uprobe for each unset programs in 'before' state ... */
-	for (idx = 0; idx < 4; idx++) {
+	for (idx = 0; idx < 6; idx++) {
 		if (test_bit(idx, before) && !test_bit(idx, after))
 			uprobe_detach(skel, idx);
 	}
 
 	/* ... and attach all new programs in 'after' state */
-	for (idx = 0; idx < 4; idx++) {
+	for (idx = 0; idx < 6; idx++) {
 		if (!test_bit(idx, before) && test_bit(idx, after)) {
 			if (!ASSERT_OK(uprobe_attach(skel, idx), "uprobe_attach_after"))
 				return -1;
@@ -855,7 +865,7 @@ static int consumer_test(struct uprobe_multi_consumers *skel,
 	printf("consumer_test before %lu after %lu\n", before, after);
 
 	/* 'before' is each, we attach uprobe for every set idx */
-	for (idx = 0; idx < 4; idx++) {
+	for (idx = 0; idx < 6; idx++) {
 		if (test_bit(idx, before)) {
 			if (!ASSERT_OK(uprobe_attach(skel, idx), "uprobe_attach_before"))
 				goto cleanup;
@@ -866,7 +876,7 @@ static int consumer_test(struct uprobe_multi_consumers *skel,
 	if (!ASSERT_EQ(err, 0, "uprobe_consumer_test"))
 		goto cleanup;
 
-	for (idx = 0; idx < 4; idx++) {
+	for (idx = 0; idx < 6; idx++) {
 		const char *fmt = "BUG";
 		__u64 val = 0;
 
@@ -878,18 +888,38 @@ static int consumer_test(struct uprobe_multi_consumers *skel,
 			if (test_bit(idx, before))
 				val++;
 			fmt = "prog 0/1: uprobe";
-		} else {
+		} else if (idx < 4) {
 			/*
 			 * to trigger uretprobe consumer, the uretprobe needs to be installed,
 			 * which means one of the 'return' uprobes was alive when probe was hit:
 			 *
-			 *   idxs: 2/3 uprobe return in 'installed' mask
+			 *   idxs: 2/3/4 uprobe return in 'installed' mask
 			 */
-			unsigned long had_uretprobes  = before & 0b1100; /* is uretprobe installed */
+			unsigned long had_uretprobes  = before & 0b011100; /* is uretprobe installed */
 
 			if (had_uretprobes && test_bit(idx, after))
 				val++;
 			fmt = "idx 2/3: uretprobe";
+		} else if (idx == 4) {
+			/*
+			 * session with return
+			 *  +1 if defined in 'before'
+			 *  +1 if defined in 'after'
+			 */
+			if (test_bit(idx, before)) {
+				val++;
+				if (test_bit(idx, after))
+					val++;
+			}
+			fmt = "idx 4  : session with return";
+		} else if (idx == 5) {
+			/*
+			 * session without return
+			 *   +1 if defined in 'before'
+			 */
+			if (test_bit(idx, before))
+				val++;
+			fmt = "idx 5  : session with NO return";
 		}
 
 		if (!ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->uprobe_result[idx], val, fmt))
@@ -900,7 +930,7 @@ static int consumer_test(struct uprobe_multi_consumers *skel,
 	ret = 0;
 
 cleanup:
-	for (idx = 0; idx < 4; idx++)
+	for (idx = 0; idx < 6; idx++)
 		uprobe_detach(skel, idx);
 	return ret;
 }
@@ -920,40 +950,45 @@ static void test_consumers(void)
 	 *
 	 *  - 2 uprobe entry consumer
 	 *  - 2 uprobe exit consumers
+	 *  - 2 uprobe session consumers
 	 *
-	 * The test uses 4 uprobes attached on single function, but that
-	 * translates into single uprobe with 4 consumers in kernel.
+	 * The test uses 6 uprobes attached on single function, but that
+	 * translates into single uprobe with 6 consumers in kernel.
 	 *
 	 * The before/after values present the state of attached consumers
 	 * before and after the probed function:
 	 *
 	 *  bit/prog 0,1 : uprobe entry
 	 *  bit/prog 2,3 : uprobe return
+	 *  bit/prog 4   : uprobe session with return
+	 *  bit/prog 5   : uprobe session without return
 	 *
 	 * For example for:
 	 *
-	 *   before = 0b0101
-	 *   after  = 0b0110
+	 *   before = 0b010101
+	 *   after  = 0b000110
 	 *
 	 * it means that before we call 'uprobe_consumer_test' we attach
 	 * uprobes defined in 'before' value:
 	 *
 	 *   - bit/prog 0: uprobe entry
 	 *   - bit/prog 2: uprobe return
+	 *   - bit/prog 4: uprobe session with return
 	 *
 	 * uprobe_consumer_test is called and inside it we attach and detach
 	 * uprobes based on 'after' value:
 	 *
 	 *   - bit/prog 0: stays untouched
 	 *   - bit/prog 2: uprobe return is detached
+	 *   - bit/prog 4: uprobe session is detached
 	 *
 	 * uprobe_consumer_test returns and we check counters values increased
 	 * by bpf programs on each uprobe to match the expected count based on
 	 * before/after bits.
 	 */
 
-	for (before = 0; before < 16; before++) {
-		for (after = 0; after < 16; after++)
+	for (before = 0; before < 64; before++) {
+		for (after = 0; after < 64; after++)
 			if (consumer_test(skel, before, after))
 				goto out;
 	}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/uprobe_multi_consumers.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/uprobe_multi_consumers.c
index 7e0fdcbbd242..448b753a4c66 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/uprobe_multi_consumers.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/uprobe_multi_consumers.c
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
 
 char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
 
-__u64 uprobe_result[4];
+__u64 uprobe_result[6];
 
 SEC("uprobe.multi")
 int uprobe_0(struct pt_regs *ctx)
@@ -37,3 +37,17 @@ int uprobe_3(struct pt_regs *ctx)
 	uprobe_result[3]++;
 	return 0;
 }
+
+SEC("uprobe.session")
+int uprobe_4(struct pt_regs *ctx)
+{
+	uprobe_result[4]++;
+	return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("uprobe.session")
+int uprobe_5(struct pt_regs *ctx)
+{
+	uprobe_result[5]++;
+	return 1;
+}
-- 
2.46.1


      parent reply	other threads:[~2024-09-29 20:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-09-29 20:57 [PATCHv5 bpf-next 00/13] uprobe, bpf: Add session support Jiri Olsa
2024-09-29 20:57 ` [PATCHv5 bpf-next 01/13] uprobe: Add data pointer to consumer handlers Jiri Olsa
2024-09-30  9:34   ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-09-30 21:35   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-09-29 20:57 ` [PATCHv5 bpf-next 02/13] uprobe: Add support for session consumer Jiri Olsa
2024-09-30  9:40   ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-09-30 11:42     ` Jiri Olsa
2024-09-30 21:36   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-10-01 13:17     ` Jiri Olsa
2024-10-01 17:09       ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-09-29 20:57 ` [PATCHv5 bpf-next 03/13] bpf: Add support for uprobe multi session attach Jiri Olsa
2024-09-30 21:36   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-10-01 13:17     ` Jiri Olsa
2024-10-01 17:11       ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-10-02 13:07         ` Jiri Olsa
2024-09-29 20:57 ` [PATCHv5 bpf-next 04/13] bpf: Add support for uprobe multi session context Jiri Olsa
2024-09-29 20:57 ` [PATCHv5 bpf-next 05/13] bpf: Allow return values 0 and 1 for uprobe/kprobe session Jiri Olsa
2024-09-30 21:36   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-10-01 13:18     ` Jiri Olsa
2024-09-29 20:57 ` [PATCHv5 bpf-next 06/13] libbpf: Add support for uprobe multi session attach Jiri Olsa
2024-09-30 21:36   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-10-01 13:18     ` Jiri Olsa
2024-09-29 20:57 ` [PATCHv5 bpf-next 07/13] selftests/bpf: Add uprobe session test Jiri Olsa
2024-09-29 20:57 ` [PATCHv5 bpf-next 08/13] selftests/bpf: Add uprobe session cookie test Jiri Olsa
2024-09-29 20:57 ` [PATCHv5 bpf-next 09/13] selftests/bpf: Add uprobe session recursive test Jiri Olsa
2024-09-29 20:57 ` [PATCHv5 bpf-next 10/13] selftests/bpf: Add uprobe session verifier test for return value Jiri Olsa
2024-09-29 20:57 ` [PATCHv5 bpf-next 11/13] selftests/bpf: Add kprobe " Jiri Olsa
2024-09-29 20:57 ` [PATCHv5 bpf-next 12/13] selftests/bpf: Add uprobe session single consumer test Jiri Olsa
2024-09-29 20:57 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240929205717.3813648-14-jolsa@kernel.org \
    --to=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=kafai@fb.com \
    --cc=kpsingh@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
    --cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
    --cc=yhs@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox