From: tyrone-wu <wudevelops@gmail.com>
To: olsajiri@gmail.com, wudevelops@gmail.com
Cc: andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com, andrii@kernel.org, ast@kernel.org,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, eddyz87@gmail.com,
haoluo@google.com, john.fastabend@gmail.com,
kernel-patches-bot@fb.com, kpsingh@kernel.org,
laoar.shao@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev,
mykolal@fb.com, sdf@fomichev.me, shuah@kernel.org,
song@kernel.org, yonghong.song@linux.dev
Subject: [PATCH bpf v2] bpf: fix unpopulated name_len field in perf_event link info
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2024 21:38:39 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241002213839.13790-1-wudevelops@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Zv0wl-S13WJnIkb_@krava>
Previously when retrieving `bpf_link_info.perf_event` for
kprobe/uprobe/tracepoint, the `name_len` field was not populated by the
kernel, leaving it to reflect the value initially set by the user. This
behavior was inconsistent with how other input/output string buffer
fields function (e.g. `raw_tracepoint.tp_name_len`).
This patch fills `name_len` with the actual size of the string name. The
relevant selftests have also been updated to assert that `name_len`
contains the correct size rather than 0.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CABVU1kXwQXhqQGe0RTrr7eegtM6SVW_KayZBy16-yb0Snztmtg@mail.gmail.com/
Fixes: 1b715e1b0ec5 ("bpf: Support ->fill_link_info for perf_event")
Signed-off-by: tyrone-wu <wudevelops@gmail.com>
---
V1 -> V2:
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/Zv0wl-S13WJnIkb_@krava/
- Use user set *ulen in bpf_copy_to_user before overwriting *ulen
kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 29 +++++++++++++------
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fill_link_info.c | 6 ++--
2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
index a8f1808a1ca5..26cc18693924 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
@@ -3565,27 +3565,31 @@ static void bpf_perf_link_dealloc(struct bpf_link *link)
}
static int bpf_perf_link_fill_common(const struct perf_event *event,
- char __user *uname, u32 ulen,
+ char __user *uname, u32 *ulen,
u64 *probe_offset, u64 *probe_addr,
u32 *fd_type, unsigned long *missed)
{
const char *buf;
u32 prog_id;
- size_t len;
+ size_t len, name_len;
int err;
- if (!ulen ^ !uname)
+ if (!(*ulen) ^ !uname)
return -EINVAL;
err = bpf_get_perf_event_info(event, &prog_id, fd_type, &buf,
probe_offset, probe_addr, missed);
if (err)
return err;
+
+ name_len = *ulen;
+ len = strlen(buf);
+ *ulen = len + 1;
if (!uname)
return 0;
+
if (buf) {
- len = strlen(buf);
- err = bpf_copy_to_user(uname, buf, ulen, len);
+ err = bpf_copy_to_user(uname, buf, name_len, len);
if (err)
return err;
} else {
@@ -3609,7 +3613,7 @@ static int bpf_perf_link_fill_kprobe(const struct perf_event *event,
uname = u64_to_user_ptr(info->perf_event.kprobe.func_name);
ulen = info->perf_event.kprobe.name_len;
- err = bpf_perf_link_fill_common(event, uname, ulen, &offset, &addr,
+ err = bpf_perf_link_fill_common(event, uname, &ulen, &offset, &addr,
&type, &missed);
if (err)
return err;
@@ -3617,7 +3621,7 @@ static int bpf_perf_link_fill_kprobe(const struct perf_event *event,
info->perf_event.type = BPF_PERF_EVENT_KRETPROBE;
else
info->perf_event.type = BPF_PERF_EVENT_KPROBE;
-
+ info->perf_event.kprobe.name_len = ulen;
info->perf_event.kprobe.offset = offset;
info->perf_event.kprobe.missed = missed;
if (!kallsyms_show_value(current_cred()))
@@ -3639,7 +3643,7 @@ static int bpf_perf_link_fill_uprobe(const struct perf_event *event,
uname = u64_to_user_ptr(info->perf_event.uprobe.file_name);
ulen = info->perf_event.uprobe.name_len;
- err = bpf_perf_link_fill_common(event, uname, ulen, &offset, &addr,
+ err = bpf_perf_link_fill_common(event, uname, &ulen, &offset, &addr,
&type, NULL);
if (err)
return err;
@@ -3648,6 +3652,7 @@ static int bpf_perf_link_fill_uprobe(const struct perf_event *event,
info->perf_event.type = BPF_PERF_EVENT_URETPROBE;
else
info->perf_event.type = BPF_PERF_EVENT_UPROBE;
+ info->perf_event.uprobe.name_len = ulen;
info->perf_event.uprobe.offset = offset;
info->perf_event.uprobe.cookie = event->bpf_cookie;
return 0;
@@ -3673,12 +3678,18 @@ static int bpf_perf_link_fill_tracepoint(const struct perf_event *event,
{
char __user *uname;
u32 ulen;
+ int err;
uname = u64_to_user_ptr(info->perf_event.tracepoint.tp_name);
ulen = info->perf_event.tracepoint.name_len;
+ err = bpf_perf_link_fill_common(event, uname, &ulen, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+
info->perf_event.type = BPF_PERF_EVENT_TRACEPOINT;
+ info->perf_event.tracepoint.name_len = ulen;
info->perf_event.tracepoint.cookie = event->bpf_cookie;
- return bpf_perf_link_fill_common(event, uname, ulen, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL);
+ return 0;
}
static int bpf_perf_link_fill_perf_event(const struct perf_event *event,
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fill_link_info.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fill_link_info.c
index f3932941bbaa..59077f260404 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fill_link_info.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fill_link_info.c
@@ -67,8 +67,8 @@ static int verify_perf_link_info(int fd, enum bpf_perf_event_type type, long add
ASSERT_EQ(info.perf_event.kprobe.cookie, PERF_EVENT_COOKIE, "kprobe_cookie");
+ ASSERT_EQ(info.perf_event.kprobe.name_len, strlen(KPROBE_FUNC) + 1, "name_len");
if (!info.perf_event.kprobe.func_name) {
- ASSERT_EQ(info.perf_event.kprobe.name_len, 0, "name_len");
info.perf_event.kprobe.func_name = ptr_to_u64(&buf);
info.perf_event.kprobe.name_len = sizeof(buf);
goto again;
@@ -79,8 +79,8 @@ static int verify_perf_link_info(int fd, enum bpf_perf_event_type type, long add
ASSERT_EQ(err, 0, "cmp_kprobe_func_name");
break;
case BPF_PERF_EVENT_TRACEPOINT:
+ ASSERT_EQ(info.perf_event.tracepoint.name_len, strlen(TP_NAME) + 1, "name_len");
if (!info.perf_event.tracepoint.tp_name) {
- ASSERT_EQ(info.perf_event.tracepoint.name_len, 0, "name_len");
info.perf_event.tracepoint.tp_name = ptr_to_u64(&buf);
info.perf_event.tracepoint.name_len = sizeof(buf);
goto again;
@@ -96,8 +96,8 @@ static int verify_perf_link_info(int fd, enum bpf_perf_event_type type, long add
case BPF_PERF_EVENT_URETPROBE:
ASSERT_EQ(info.perf_event.uprobe.offset, offset, "uprobe_offset");
+ ASSERT_EQ(info.perf_event.uprobe.name_len, strlen(UPROBE_FILE) + 1, "name_len");
if (!info.perf_event.uprobe.file_name) {
- ASSERT_EQ(info.perf_event.uprobe.name_len, 0, "name_len");
info.perf_event.uprobe.file_name = ptr_to_u64(&buf);
info.perf_event.uprobe.name_len = sizeof(buf);
goto again;
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-02 21:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-22 19:59 bpf_link_info: perf_event link info name_len field returning zero Tyrone Wu
2024-09-27 23:13 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-09-29 2:35 ` Yafang Shao
2024-09-29 7:19 ` Tyrone Wu
[not found] ` <CABVU1kWDy4vPM-Kw1fGEyFtZqYkBcbB-2hktO2CBxE1P0L350w@mail.gmail.com>
2024-09-29 7:31 ` Yafang Shao
2024-09-30 11:28 ` Jiri Olsa
2024-09-30 23:59 ` [PATCH bpf] bpf: fix unpopulated name_len field in perf_event link info tyrone-wu
2024-10-02 11:37 ` Jiri Olsa
2024-10-02 21:38 ` tyrone-wu [this message]
2024-10-03 19:10 ` [PATCH bpf v2] " Jiri Olsa
2024-10-03 20:23 ` [PATCH bpf v3] " tyrone-wu
2024-10-04 11:19 ` Jiri Olsa
2024-10-04 15:40 ` [PATCH bpf v4 1/2] " tyrone-wu
2024-10-04 15:40 ` [PATCH bpf v4 2/2] selftests/bpf: fix perf_event link info name_len assertion tyrone-wu
2024-10-06 6:00 ` [PATCH bpf v4 1/2] bpf: fix unpopulated name_len field in perf_event link info Yafang Shao
2024-10-06 19:51 ` [PATCH bpf v5 " tyrone-wu
2024-10-06 19:51 ` [PATCH bpf v5 2/2] selftests/bpf: fix perf_event link info name_len assertion tyrone-wu
2024-10-07 2:09 ` Yafang Shao
2024-10-07 2:09 ` [PATCH bpf v5 1/2] bpf: fix unpopulated name_len field in perf_event link info Yafang Shao
2024-10-07 8:07 ` Jiri Olsa
2024-10-07 18:29 ` [PATCH bpf v6 " Tyrone Wu
2024-10-07 18:29 ` [PATCH bpf v6 2/2] selftests/bpf: fix perf_event link info name_len assertion Tyrone Wu
2024-10-08 4:04 ` [PATCH bpf v6 1/2] bpf: fix unpopulated name_len field in perf_event link info Andrii Nakryiko
2024-10-08 16:43 ` [PATCH bpf v7 " Tyrone Wu
2024-10-08 16:43 ` [PATCH bpf v7 2/2] selftests/bpf: fix perf_event link info name_len assertion Tyrone Wu
2024-10-10 1:20 ` [PATCH bpf v7 1/2] bpf: fix unpopulated name_len field in perf_event link info patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241002213839.13790-1-wudevelops@gmail.com \
--to=wudevelops@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-patches-bot@fb.com \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=laoar.shao@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=mykolal@fb.com \
--cc=olsajiri@gmail.com \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox