From: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
kernel-team@fb.com, Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v4 06/10] selftests/bpf: Add private stack tests
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2024 10:56:23 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241010175623.1898269-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241010175552.1895980-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Some private stack tests are added including:
- prog with stack size greater than BPF_PSTACK_MIN_SUBTREE_SIZE.
- prog with stack size less than BPF_PSTACK_MIN_SUBTREE_SIZE.
- prog with one subprog having MAX_BPF_STACK stack size and another
subprog having non-zero stack size.
- prog with callback function.
- prog with exception in main prog or subprog.
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
---
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c | 2 +
.../bpf/progs/verifier_private_stack.c | 216 ++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 218 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_private_stack.c
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c
index e26b5150fc43..635ff3509403 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c
@@ -59,6 +59,7 @@
#include "verifier_or_jmp32_k.skel.h"
#include "verifier_precision.skel.h"
#include "verifier_prevent_map_lookup.skel.h"
+#include "verifier_private_stack.skel.h"
#include "verifier_raw_stack.skel.h"
#include "verifier_raw_tp_writable.skel.h"
#include "verifier_reg_equal.skel.h"
@@ -185,6 +186,7 @@ void test_verifier_bpf_fastcall(void) { RUN(verifier_bpf_fastcall); }
void test_verifier_or_jmp32_k(void) { RUN(verifier_or_jmp32_k); }
void test_verifier_precision(void) { RUN(verifier_precision); }
void test_verifier_prevent_map_lookup(void) { RUN(verifier_prevent_map_lookup); }
+void test_verifier_private_stack(void) { RUN(verifier_private_stack); }
void test_verifier_raw_stack(void) { RUN(verifier_raw_stack); }
void test_verifier_raw_tp_writable(void) { RUN(verifier_raw_tp_writable); }
void test_verifier_reg_equal(void) { RUN(verifier_reg_equal); }
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_private_stack.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_private_stack.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..e8de565f8b34
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_private_stack.c
@@ -0,0 +1,216 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+#include <vmlinux.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+#include "bpf_misc.h"
+#include "bpf_experimental.h"
+
+/* From include/linux/filter.h */
+#define MAX_BPF_STACK 512
+
+#if defined(__TARGET_ARCH_x86)
+
+SEC("kprobe")
+__description("Private stack, single prog")
+__success
+__arch_x86_64
+__jited(" movabsq $0x{{.*}}, %r9")
+__jited(" addq %gs:0x{{.*}}, %r9")
+__jited(" movl $0x2a, %edi")
+__jited(" movq %rdi, -0x100(%r9)")
+__naked void private_stack_single_prog(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (
+ "r1 = 42;"
+ "*(u64 *)(r10 - 256) = r1;"
+ "r0 = 0;"
+ "exit;"
+ :
+ :
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+__used
+__naked static void cumulative_stack_depth_subprog(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (
+ "r1 = 41;"
+ "*(u64 *)(r10 - 32) = r1;"
+ "call %[bpf_get_smp_processor_id];"
+ "exit;"
+ :: __imm(bpf_get_smp_processor_id)
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("kprobe")
+__description("Private stack, subtree > MAX_BPF_STACK")
+__success
+__arch_x86_64
+/* private stack fp for the main prog */
+__jited(" movabsq $0x{{.*}}, %r9")
+__jited(" addq %gs:0x{{.*}}, %r9")
+__jited(" movl $0x2a, %edi")
+__jited(" movq %rdi, -0x200(%r9)")
+__jited(" pushq %r9")
+__jited(" callq 0x{{.*}}")
+__jited(" popq %r9")
+__jited(" xorl %eax, %eax")
+__naked void private_stack_nested_1(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (
+ "r1 = 42;"
+ "*(u64 *)(r10 - %[max_bpf_stack]) = r1;"
+ "call cumulative_stack_depth_subprog;"
+ "r0 = 0;"
+ "exit;"
+ :
+ : __imm_const(max_bpf_stack, MAX_BPF_STACK)
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("kprobe")
+__description("Private stack, subtree > MAX_BPF_STACK")
+__success
+__arch_x86_64
+/* private stack fp for the subprog */
+__jited(" addq $0x20, %r9")
+__naked void private_stack_nested_2(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (
+ "r1 = 42;"
+ "*(u64 *)(r10 - %[max_bpf_stack]) = r1;"
+ "call cumulative_stack_depth_subprog;"
+ "r0 = 0;"
+ "exit;"
+ :
+ : __imm_const(max_bpf_stack, MAX_BPF_STACK)
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("raw_tp")
+__description("No private stack, nested")
+__success
+__arch_x86_64
+__jited(" subq $0x8, %rsp")
+__naked void no_private_stack_nested(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (
+ "r1 = 42;"
+ "*(u64 *)(r10 - 8) = r1;"
+ "call cumulative_stack_depth_subprog;"
+ "r0 = 0;"
+ "exit;"
+ :
+ :
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+__naked __noinline __used
+static unsigned long loop_callback(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (
+ "call %[bpf_get_prandom_u32];"
+ "r1 = 42;"
+ "*(u64 *)(r10 - 512) = r1;"
+ "call cumulative_stack_depth_subprog;"
+ "r0 = 0;"
+ "exit;"
+ :
+ : __imm(bpf_get_prandom_u32)
+ : __clobber_common);
+}
+
+SEC("raw_tp")
+__description("Private stack, callback")
+__success
+__arch_x86_64
+/* for func loop_callback */
+__jited("func #1")
+__jited(" endbr64")
+__jited(" nopl (%rax,%rax)")
+__jited(" nopl (%rax)")
+__jited(" pushq %rbp")
+__jited(" movq %rsp, %rbp")
+__jited(" endbr64")
+__jited(" movabsq $0x{{.*}}, %r9")
+__jited(" addq %gs:0x{{.*}}, %r9")
+__jited(" pushq %r9")
+__jited(" callq")
+__jited(" popq %r9")
+__jited(" movl $0x2a, %edi")
+__jited(" movq %rdi, -0x200(%r9)")
+__jited(" pushq %r9")
+__jited(" callq")
+__jited(" popq %r9")
+__naked void private_stack_callback(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (
+ "r1 = 1;"
+ "r2 = %[loop_callback];"
+ "r3 = 0;"
+ "r4 = 0;"
+ "call %[bpf_loop];"
+ "r0 = 0;"
+ "exit;"
+ :
+ : __imm_ptr(loop_callback),
+ __imm(bpf_loop)
+ : __clobber_common);
+}
+
+SEC("fentry/bpf_fentry_test9")
+__description("Private stack, exception in main prog")
+__success __retval(0)
+__arch_x86_64
+__jited(" pushq %r9")
+__jited(" callq")
+__jited(" popq %r9")
+int private_stack_exception_main_prog(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (
+ "r1 = 42;"
+ "*(u64 *)(r10 - 512) = r1;"
+ ::: __clobber_common);
+
+ bpf_throw(0);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+__used static int subprog_exception(void)
+{
+ bpf_throw(0);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("fentry/bpf_fentry_test9")
+__description("Private stack, exception in subprog")
+__success __retval(0)
+__arch_x86_64
+__jited(" movq %rdi, -0x200(%r9)")
+__jited(" pushq %r9")
+__jited(" callq")
+__jited(" popq %r9")
+int private_stack_exception_sub_prog(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (
+ "r1 = 42;"
+ "*(u64 *)(r10 - 512) = r1;"
+ "call subprog_exception;"
+ ::: __clobber_common);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+#else
+
+SEC("kprobe")
+__description("private stack is not supported, use a dummy test")
+__success
+int dummy_test(void)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
+#endif
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
--
2.43.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-10 17:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-10 17:55 [PATCH bpf-next v4 00/10] bpf: Support private stack for bpf progs Yonghong Song
2024-10-10 17:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 01/10] bpf: Allow each subprog having stack size of 512 bytes Yonghong Song
2024-10-10 17:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 02/10] bpf: Mark each subprog with proper private stack modes Yonghong Song
2024-10-10 17:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 03/10] bpf, x86: Refactor func emit_prologue Yonghong Song
2024-10-10 17:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 04/10] bpf, x86: Create a helper for certain "reg <op>= imm" operations Yonghong Song
2024-10-10 17:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 05/10] bpf, x86: Add jit support for private stack Yonghong Song
2024-10-10 17:56 ` Yonghong Song [this message]
2024-10-10 17:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 07/10] bpf: Support calling non-tailcall bpf prog Yonghong Song
2024-10-10 20:28 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-10-11 4:12 ` Yonghong Song
2024-10-15 21:18 ` Tejun Heo
2024-10-15 21:35 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-10-10 17:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 08/10] bpf, x86: Create two helpers for some arith operations Yonghong Song
2024-10-10 20:21 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-10-11 4:16 ` Yonghong Song
2024-10-10 17:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 09/10] bpf, x86: Jit support for nested bpf_prog_call Yonghong Song
2024-10-10 20:53 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-10-11 4:20 ` Yonghong Song
2024-10-11 4:29 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-10-11 15:38 ` Yonghong Song
2024-10-11 15:40 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-10-11 16:14 ` Yonghong Song
2024-10-10 17:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 10/10] selftests/bpf: Add tests for bpf_prog_call() Yonghong Song
2024-10-15 21:28 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 00/10] bpf: Support private stack for bpf progs Tejun Heo
2024-10-15 21:39 ` Alexei Starovoitov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241010175623.1898269-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev \
--to=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox