public inbox for bpf@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: mrpre <mrpre@163.com>
To: yonghong.song@linux.dev, john.fastabend@gmail.com,
	martin.lau@kernel.org, edumazet@google.com, jakub@cloudflare.com,
	davem@davemloft.net, dsahern@kernel.org, kuba@kernel.org,
	pabeni@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mrpre <mrpre@163.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] bpf: implement libbpf sockmap cpu affinity
Date: Fri,  1 Nov 2024 10:38:32 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241101023832.32404-2-mrpre@163.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241101023832.32404-1-mrpre@163.com>

implement libbpf sockmap cpu affinity

Signed-off-by: Jiayuan Chen <mrpre@163.com>
---
 tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h                |  4 ++++
 tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c                           | 22 +++++++++++++++++++
 tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h                           |  9 ++++++++
 tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map                      |  1 +
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_basic.c  | 19 ++++++++++++----
 5 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
index f28b6527e815..2019a87b5d4a 100644
--- a/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
@@ -1509,6 +1509,10 @@ union bpf_attr {
 			__aligned_u64 next_key;
 		};
 		__u64		flags;
+		union {
+			/* specify the CPU where the sockmap job run on */
+			__aligned_u64 target_cpu;
+		};
 	};
 
 	struct { /* struct used by BPF_MAP_*_BATCH commands */
diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c
index 2a4c71501a17..13c3f3cfe889 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c
@@ -401,6 +401,28 @@ int bpf_map_update_elem(int fd, const void *key, const void *value,
 	return libbpf_err_errno(ret);
 }
 
+int bpf_map_update_elem_opts(int fd, const void *key, const void *value,
+			     __u64 flags, const struct bpf_map_update_opts *opts)
+{
+	union bpf_attr attr;
+	int ret;
+	__u64 *target_cpu;
+
+	if (!OPTS_VALID(opts, bpf_map_update_opts))
+		return libbpf_err(-EINVAL);
+
+	target_cpu = OPTS_GET(opts, target_cpu, NULL);
+	memset(&attr, 0, sizeof(attr));
+	attr.map_fd = fd;
+	attr.key = ptr_to_u64(key);
+	attr.value = ptr_to_u64(value);
+	attr.flags = flags;
+	attr.target_cpu = ptr_to_u64(target_cpu);
+
+	ret = sys_bpf(BPF_MAP_UPDATE_ELEM, &attr, sizeof(attr));
+	return libbpf_err_errno(ret);
+}
+
 int bpf_map_lookup_elem(int fd, const void *key, void *value)
 {
 	const size_t attr_sz = offsetofend(union bpf_attr, flags);
diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h
index a4a7b1ad1b63..aec6dfddf697 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h
@@ -147,6 +147,15 @@ LIBBPF_API int bpf_btf_load(const void *btf_data, size_t btf_size,
 
 LIBBPF_API int bpf_map_update_elem(int fd, const void *key, const void *value,
 				   __u64 flags);
+struct bpf_map_update_opts {
+	size_t sz;  /* size of this struct for forward/backward compatibility */
+	/* specify the CPU where the sockmap job run on */
+	__u64 *target_cpu;
+	size_t :0;
+};
+#define bpf_map_update_opts__last_field target_cpu
+LIBBPF_API int bpf_map_update_elem_opts(int fd, const void *key, const void *value,
+					__u64 flags, const struct bpf_map_update_opts *opts);
 
 LIBBPF_API int bpf_map_lookup_elem(int fd, const void *key, void *value);
 LIBBPF_API int bpf_map_lookup_elem_flags(int fd, const void *key, void *value,
diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map
index 54b6f312cfa8..ab5ec29f542d 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ LIBBPF_0.0.1 {
 		bpf_map_lookup_and_delete_elem;
 		bpf_map_lookup_elem;
 		bpf_map_update_elem;
+		bpf_map_update_elem_opts;
 		bpf_obj_get;
 		bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd;
 		bpf_obj_pin;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_basic.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_basic.c
index 82bfb266741c..84a35cb4b9fe 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_basic.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_basic.c
@@ -190,13 +190,18 @@ static void test_skmsg_helpers_with_link(enum bpf_map_type map_type)
 	test_skmsg_load_helpers__destroy(skel);
 }
 
-static void test_sockmap_update(enum bpf_map_type map_type)
+static void test_sockmap_update(enum bpf_map_type map_type, bool cpu_affinity)
 {
 	int err, prog, src;
 	struct test_sockmap_update *skel;
 	struct bpf_map *dst_map;
 	const __u32 zero = 0;
 	char dummy[14] = {0};
+	__u64 target_cpu = 0;
+
+	LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_map_update_opts, update_opts,
+		.target_cpu = &target_cpu,
+	);
 	LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_test_run_opts, topts,
 		.data_in = dummy,
 		.data_size_in = sizeof(dummy),
@@ -219,7 +224,11 @@ static void test_sockmap_update(enum bpf_map_type map_type)
 	else
 		dst_map = skel->maps.dst_sock_hash;
 
-	err = bpf_map_update_elem(src, &zero, &sk, BPF_NOEXIST);
+	if (cpu_affinity)
+		err = bpf_map_update_elem_opts(src, &zero, &sk, BPF_NOEXIST, &update_opts);
+	else
+		err = bpf_map_update_elem(src, &zero, &sk, BPF_NOEXIST);
+
 	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "update_elem(src)"))
 		goto out;
 
@@ -896,9 +905,11 @@ void test_sockmap_basic(void)
 	if (test__start_subtest("sockhash sk_msg load helpers"))
 		test_skmsg_helpers(BPF_MAP_TYPE_SOCKHASH);
 	if (test__start_subtest("sockmap update"))
-		test_sockmap_update(BPF_MAP_TYPE_SOCKMAP);
+		test_sockmap_update(BPF_MAP_TYPE_SOCKMAP, false);
+	if (test__start_subtest("sockmap update cpu affinity"))
+		test_sockmap_update(BPF_MAP_TYPE_SOCKMAP, true);
 	if (test__start_subtest("sockhash update"))
-		test_sockmap_update(BPF_MAP_TYPE_SOCKHASH);
+		test_sockmap_update(BPF_MAP_TYPE_SOCKHASH, false);
 	if (test__start_subtest("sockmap update in unsafe context"))
 		test_sockmap_invalid_update();
 	if (test__start_subtest("sockmap copy"))
-- 
2.43.5


  reply	other threads:[~2024-11-01  2:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-11-01  2:38 [PATCH 1/2] bpf: Introduce cpu affinity for sockmap mrpre
2024-11-01  2:38 ` mrpre [this message]
2024-11-01 13:20 ` kernel test robot
2024-11-01 14:02 ` kernel test robot
2024-11-01 19:25 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-11-04  6:12   ` Jiayuan Chen
2024-11-06 21:43     ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-11-06 13:49 ` Simon Horman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20241101023832.32404-2-mrpre@163.com \
    --to=mrpre@163.com \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=jakub@cloudflare.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox