public inbox for bpf@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	kernel-team@fb.com, Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v9 09/10] bpf: Support private stack for struct_ops progs
Date: Mon,  4 Nov 2024 11:35:42 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241104193542.3245367-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241104193455.3241859-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev>

For struct_ops progs, whether a particular prog will use private stack
or not (prog->aux->use_priv_stack) will be set before actual insn-level
verification for that prog. One particular implementation is to
piggyback on struct_ops->check_member(). The next patch will have an
example for this. The struct_ops->check_member() will set
prog->aux->use_priv_stack to be true which enables private stack
usage with ignoring BPF_PRIV_STACK_MIN_SIZE limit.

If use_priv_stack is true for a particular struct_ops prog, bpf
trampoline will need to do recursion checks (one level at this point)
to avoid stack overwrite. A field (recursion_detected()) is added to
bpf_prog_aux structure such that if bpf_prog->aux->recursion_detected
is set by the struct_ops subsystem, the function will be called
to report an error, collect related info, etc.

Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
---
 include/linux/bpf.h          |  1 +
 include/linux/bpf_verifier.h |  1 +
 kernel/bpf/trampoline.c      |  4 ++++
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c        | 20 +++++++++++++++++++-
 4 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
index 8a3ea7440a4a..d04f990dd6d9 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
@@ -1528,6 +1528,7 @@ struct bpf_prog_aux {
 	u64 prog_array_member_cnt; /* counts how many times as member of prog_array */
 	struct mutex ext_mutex; /* mutex for is_extended and prog_array_member_cnt */
 	struct bpf_arena *arena;
+	void (*recursion_detected)(struct bpf_prog *prog); /* callback if recursion is detected */
 	/* BTF_KIND_FUNC_PROTO for valid attach_btf_id */
 	const struct btf_type *attach_func_proto;
 	/* function name for valid attach_btf_id */
diff --git a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
index e921589abc72..f65431c42f9e 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
@@ -891,6 +891,7 @@ static inline bool bpf_prog_check_recur(const struct bpf_prog *prog)
 	case BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING:
 		return prog->expected_attach_type != BPF_TRACE_ITER;
 	case BPF_PROG_TYPE_STRUCT_OPS:
+		return prog->aux->use_priv_stack;
 	case BPF_PROG_TYPE_LSM:
 	default:
 		return false;
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c b/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c
index 9f36c049f4c2..a8d188b31da5 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c
@@ -899,6 +899,8 @@ static u64 notrace __bpf_prog_enter_recur(struct bpf_prog *prog, struct bpf_tram
 
 	if (unlikely(this_cpu_inc_return(*(prog->active)) != 1)) {
 		bpf_prog_inc_misses_counter(prog);
+		if (prog->aux->recursion_detected)
+			prog->aux->recursion_detected(prog);
 		return 0;
 	}
 	return bpf_prog_start_time();
@@ -975,6 +977,8 @@ u64 notrace __bpf_prog_enter_sleepable_recur(struct bpf_prog *prog,
 
 	if (unlikely(this_cpu_inc_return(*(prog->active)) != 1)) {
 		bpf_prog_inc_misses_counter(prog);
+		if (prog->aux->recursion_detected)
+			prog->aux->recursion_detected(prog);
 		return 0;
 	}
 	return bpf_prog_start_time();
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 03ae76d57076..ee16c328dffc 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -6045,6 +6045,8 @@ static enum priv_stack_mode bpf_enable_priv_stack(struct bpf_prog *prog)
 	if (!bpf_prog_check_recur(prog))
 		return NO_PRIV_STACK;
 
+	if (prog->type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_STRUCT_OPS)
+		return PRIV_STACK_ALWAYS;
 
 	return PRIV_STACK_ADAPTIVE;
 }
@@ -6118,7 +6120,8 @@ static int check_max_stack_depth_subprog(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int idx,
 					idx, subprog_depth);
 				return -EACCES;
 			}
-			if (subprog_depth >= BPF_PRIV_STACK_MIN_SIZE) {
+			if (priv_stack_supported == PRIV_STACK_ALWAYS ||
+			    subprog_depth >= BPF_PRIV_STACK_MIN_SIZE) {
 				subprog[idx].use_priv_stack = true;
 				subprog[idx].visited_with_priv_stack = true;
 			}
@@ -6235,6 +6238,11 @@ static int check_max_stack_depth(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
 		for (int i = 0; i < env->subprog_cnt; i++) {
 			if (!si[i].has_tail_call)
 				continue;
+			if (priv_stack_supported == PRIV_STACK_ALWAYS) {
+				verbose(env,
+					"Private stack not supported due to tail call\n");
+				return -EACCES;
+			}
 			priv_stack_supported = NO_PRIV_STACK;
 			break;
 		}
@@ -6275,6 +6283,11 @@ static int check_max_stack_depth(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
 				depth_frame, subtree_depth);
 			return -EACCES;
 		}
+		if (orig_priv_stack_supported == PRIV_STACK_ALWAYS) {
+			verbose(env,
+				"Private stack not supported due to possible nested subprog run\n");
+			return -EACCES;
+		}
 		if (orig_priv_stack_supported == PRIV_STACK_ADAPTIVE) {
 			for (int i = 0; i < env->subprog_cnt; i++)
 				si[i].use_priv_stack = false;
@@ -21950,6 +21963,11 @@ static int check_struct_ops_btf_id(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
 		}
 	}
 
+	if (prog->aux->use_priv_stack && !bpf_jit_supports_private_stack()) {
+		verbose(env, "Private stack not supported by jit\n");
+		return -EACCES;
+	}
+
 	/* btf_ctx_access() used this to provide argument type info */
 	prog->aux->ctx_arg_info =
 		st_ops_desc->arg_info[member_idx].info;
-- 
2.43.5


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-11-04 19:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-11-04 19:34 [PATCH bpf-next v9 00/10] bpf: Support private stack for bpf progs Yonghong Song
2024-11-04 19:35 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 01/10] bpf: Check stack depth limit after visiting all subprogs Yonghong Song
2024-11-04 19:35 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 02/10] bpf: Return false for bpf_prog_check_recur() default case Yonghong Song
2024-11-05  1:21   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-11-05  1:35     ` Yonghong Song
2024-11-05  1:55       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-11-05  2:53         ` Yonghong Song
2024-11-05  3:50           ` Yonghong Song
2024-11-05  4:28             ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-11-05  6:02               ` Yonghong Song
2024-11-05 15:50                 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-11-05 16:33                   ` Yonghong Song
2024-11-05 16:38                     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-11-05 16:48                       ` Yonghong Song
2024-11-05 17:47                         ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-11-04 19:35 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 03/10] bpf: Allow private stack to have each subprog having stack size of 512 bytes Yonghong Song
2024-11-05  2:47   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-11-05  3:09     ` Yonghong Song
2024-11-04 19:35 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 04/10] bpf: Check potential private stack recursion for progs with async callback Yonghong Song
2024-11-05  2:51   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-11-05  3:37     ` Yonghong Song
2024-11-05 20:26       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-11-05 21:26         ` Yonghong Song
2024-11-05 21:52           ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-11-06  0:19             ` Yonghong Song
2024-11-06  1:07               ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-11-06  2:33                 ` Yonghong Song
2024-11-06  6:55                 ` Yonghong Song
2024-11-06 15:26                   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-11-06 15:44                     ` Yonghong Song
2024-11-04 19:35 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 05/10] bpf: Allocate private stack for eligible main prog or subprogs Yonghong Song
2024-11-05  1:38   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-11-05  3:07     ` Yonghong Song
2024-11-05  3:44       ` Yonghong Song
2024-11-05  5:19         ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-11-05  6:05           ` Yonghong Song
2024-11-04 19:35 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 06/10] bpf, x86: Avoid repeated usage of bpf_prog->aux->stack_depth Yonghong Song
2024-11-04 19:35 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 07/10] bpf, x86: Support private stack in jit Yonghong Song
2024-11-04 19:35 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 08/10] selftests/bpf: Add tracing prog private stack tests Yonghong Song
2024-11-04 19:35 ` Yonghong Song [this message]
2024-11-04 19:35 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 10/10] selftests/bpf: Add struct_ops " Yonghong Song

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20241104193542.3245367-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    --to=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox