From: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org
Cc: andrii@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, martin.lau@linux.dev,
kernel-team@fb.com, yonghong.song@linux.dev, memxor@gmail.com,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Subject: [RFC bpf-next 10/11] selftests/bpf: tests to verify handling of inlined kfuncs
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2024 09:50:39 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241107175040.1659341-11-eddyz87@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241107175040.1659341-1-eddyz87@gmail.com>
Verify that:
- kfunc callsites are treated independently;
- scalar parameters range is known in the inlined body;
- null pointer parameters are known as null in the inlined body;
- type of dynptr parameters is known in the inlined body;
- memory references are passed as KERNEL_VALUE objects;
- callee saved registers r6-r9 are spilled/filled at before/after
inlined body;
- r10 escapes in kfunc body.
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
---
.../selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/Makefile | 24 +-
.../{bpf_testmod.c => bpf_testmod_core.c} | 25 ++
.../bpf/bpf_testmod/test_inlinable_kfuncs.c | 132 +++++++++
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c | 7 +
.../bpf/progs/verifier_inlinable_kfuncs.c | 253 ++++++++++++++++++
5 files changed, 440 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
rename tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/{bpf_testmod.c => bpf_testmod_core.c} (97%)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/test_inlinable_kfuncs.c
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_inlinable_kfuncs.c
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/Makefile
index 15cb36c4483a..242669a6954a 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/Makefile
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/Makefile
@@ -10,7 +10,9 @@ endif
MODULES = bpf_testmod.ko
obj-m += bpf_testmod.o
-CFLAGS_bpf_testmod.o = -I$(src)
+CFLAGS_bpf_testmod_core.o = -I$(src)
+
+bpf_testmod-y := bpf_testmod_core.o test_inlinable_kfuncs.o
all:
+$(Q)make -C $(KDIR) M=$(BPF_TESTMOD_DIR) modules
@@ -18,3 +20,23 @@ all:
clean:
+$(Q)make -C $(KDIR) M=$(BPF_TESTMOD_DIR) clean
+ifdef CONFIG_CC_IS_CLANG
+
+CLANG ?= $(LLVM_PREFIX)clang$(LLVM_SUFFIX)
+LLC ?= $(LLVM_PREFIX)llc$(LLVM_SUFFIX)
+
+CFLAGS_REMOVE_test_inlinable_kfuncs.bpf.bc.o += $(CC_FLAGS_FTRACE)
+CFLAGS_REMOVE_test_inlinable_kfuncs.bpf.bc.o += $(PADDING_CFLAGS)
+CFLAGS_test_inlinable_kfuncs.bpf.bc.o += -D__FOR_BPF
+$(obj)/test_inlinable_kfuncs.bpf.bc.o: $(src)/test_inlinable_kfuncs.c
+ $(Q)$(CLANG) $(c_flags) -emit-llvm -c $< -o $@
+
+$(obj)/test_inlinable_kfuncs.bpf.o: $(obj)/test_inlinable_kfuncs.bpf.bc.o
+ $(Q)$(LLC) -mcpu=v3 --mtriple=bpf --filetype=obj $< -o $@
+
+$(obj)/test_inlinable_kfuncs.bpf.linked.o: $(obj)/test_inlinable_kfuncs.bpf.o
+ $(Q)$(BPFTOOL) gen object $@ $<
+
+$(obj)/bpf_testmod_core.o: $(obj)/test_inlinable_kfuncs.bpf.linked.o
+
+endif
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod_core.c
similarity index 97%
rename from tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c
rename to tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod_core.c
index 987d41af71d2..586b752ad6eb 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod_core.c
@@ -586,6 +586,14 @@ BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_trusted_num_test, KF_TRUSTED_ARGS)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_rcu_task_test, KF_RCU)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_testmod_ctx_create, KF_ACQUIRE | KF_RET_NULL)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_testmod_ctx_release, KF_RELEASE)
+BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_test_inline_kfunc1)
+BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_test_inline_kfunc2)
+BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_test_inline_kfunc3)
+BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_test_inline_kfunc4)
+BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_test_inline_kfunc5)
+BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_test_inline_kfunc6)
+BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_test_inline_kfunc7)
+BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_test_inline_kfunc8)
BTF_KFUNCS_END(bpf_testmod_common_kfunc_ids)
BTF_ID_LIST(bpf_testmod_dtor_ids)
@@ -1315,6 +1323,19 @@ static struct bpf_struct_ops testmod_st_ops = {
extern int bpf_fentry_test1(int a);
+asm (
+" .pushsection .data, \"a\" \n"
+" .global test_inlinable_kfuncs_data \n"
+"test_inlinable_kfuncs_data: \n"
+" .incbin \"test_inlinable_kfuncs.bpf.linked.o\" \n"
+" .global test_inlinable_kfuncs_data_end \n"
+"test_inlinable_kfuncs_data_end: \n"
+" .popsection \n"
+);
+
+extern void test_inlinable_kfuncs_data;
+extern void test_inlinable_kfuncs_data_end;
+
static int bpf_testmod_init(void)
{
const struct btf_id_dtor_kfunc bpf_testmod_dtors[] = {
@@ -1337,6 +1358,9 @@ static int bpf_testmod_init(void)
ret = ret ?: register_btf_id_dtor_kfuncs(bpf_testmod_dtors,
ARRAY_SIZE(bpf_testmod_dtors),
THIS_MODULE);
+ ret = ret ?: bpf_register_inlinable_kfuncs(&test_inlinable_kfuncs_data,
+ &test_inlinable_kfuncs_data_end - &test_inlinable_kfuncs_data,
+ THIS_MODULE);
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
if (bpf_fentry_test1(0) < 0)
@@ -1373,6 +1397,7 @@ static void bpf_testmod_exit(void)
bpf_kfunc_close_sock();
sysfs_remove_bin_file(kernel_kobj, &bin_attr_bpf_testmod_file);
unregister_bpf_testmod_uprobe();
+ bpf_unregister_inlinable_kfuncs(THIS_MODULE);
}
module_init(bpf_testmod_init);
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/test_inlinable_kfuncs.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/test_inlinable_kfuncs.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..d8b90ee7f2b0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/test_inlinable_kfuncs.c
@@ -0,0 +1,132 @@
+#include <linux/bpf.h>
+
+#define __imm(name) [name]"i"(name)
+
+__bpf_kfunc int bpf_test_inline_kfunc1(int p);
+__bpf_kfunc int bpf_test_inline_kfunc2(int *p);
+__bpf_kfunc int bpf_test_inline_kfunc3(void *p, u64 p__sz);
+__bpf_kfunc int bpf_test_inline_kfunc4(void);
+__bpf_kfunc int bpf_test_inline_kfunc5(struct bpf_dynptr *d);
+__bpf_kfunc int bpf_test_inline_kfunc6(void);
+__bpf_kfunc int bpf_test_inline_kfunc7(void);
+__bpf_kfunc int bpf_test_inline_kfunc8(void);
+
+#ifdef __FOR_BPF
+__attribute__((naked))
+int bpf_test_inline_kfunc1(int p)
+{
+ asm volatile (
+ "r0 = 42;"
+ "if r1 != 1 goto +1;"
+ "r0 = 11;"
+ "if r1 != 2 goto +1;"
+ "r0 = 22;"
+ "exit;"
+ );
+}
+
+__attribute__((naked))
+int bpf_test_inline_kfunc2(int *p)
+{
+ asm volatile (
+ "r0 = 42;"
+ "if r1 != 0 goto +1;"
+ "r0 = 24;"
+ "exit;"
+ );
+}
+
+__attribute__((naked))
+int bpf_test_inline_kfunc3(void *p, u64 p__sz)
+{
+ asm volatile (
+ "r1 = *(u64 *)(r1 + 0);"
+ "*(u64 *)(r1 + 0) = 42;"
+ "r0 = 0;"
+ "exit;"
+ );
+}
+
+__attribute__((naked))
+int bpf_test_inline_kfunc4(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (
+ "r0 = 0;"
+ "r1 = 1;"
+ "r2 = 2;"
+ "r6 = 3;"
+ "r7 = 4;"
+ "exit;"
+ );
+}
+
+__attribute__((naked))
+int bpf_test_inline_kfunc5(struct bpf_dynptr *d)
+{
+ asm volatile (
+ " r1 = *(u32 *)(r1 + 8);"
+ " r1 &= %[INV_RDONLY_BIT];"
+ " r1 >>= %[TYPE_SHIFT];"
+ " if r1 != %[BPF_DYNPTR_TYPE_SKB] goto 1f;"
+ " r0 = 1;"
+ " goto 3f;"
+ "1: if r1 != %[BPF_DYNPTR_TYPE_XDP] goto 2f;"
+ " r0 = 2;"
+ " goto 3f;"
+ "2: r0 = 3;"
+ "3: exit;"
+ :: __imm(BPF_DYNPTR_TYPE_SKB),
+ __imm(BPF_DYNPTR_TYPE_XDP),
+ [INV_RDONLY_BIT]"i"(~DYNPTR_RDONLY_BIT),
+ [TYPE_SHIFT]"i"(DYNPTR_TYPE_SHIFT));
+}
+
+__attribute__((naked))
+int bpf_test_inline_kfunc6(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (
+ "r0 = 0;"
+ "*(u64 *)(r10 - 8) = r0;"
+ "r0 = *(u64 *)(r10 - 8);"
+ "r6 = 1;"
+ "exit;"
+ );
+}
+
+__attribute__((naked))
+int bpf_test_inline_kfunc7(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (
+ "r0 = 0;"
+ "*(u64 *)(r10 - 8) = r10;"
+ "exit;"
+ );
+}
+
+__attribute__((naked))
+int bpf_test_inline_kfunc8(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (
+ "r0 = 0;"
+ "r1 = r10;"
+ "exit;"
+ );
+}
+
+#endif /* __FOR_BPF */
+
+#ifndef __FOR_BPF
+
+/* Only interested in BPF assembly bodies of these functions, keep dummy bodies */
+__bpf_kfunc int bpf_test_inline_kfunc1(int p) { return 0; }
+__bpf_kfunc int bpf_test_inline_kfunc2(int *p) { return 0; }
+__bpf_kfunc int bpf_test_inline_kfunc3(void *p, u64 p__sz) { return 0; }
+__bpf_kfunc int bpf_test_inline_kfunc4(void) { return 0; }
+__bpf_kfunc int bpf_test_inline_kfunc5(struct bpf_dynptr *p) { return 0; }
+__bpf_kfunc int bpf_test_inline_kfunc6(void) { return 0; }
+__bpf_kfunc int bpf_test_inline_kfunc7(void) { return 0; }
+__bpf_kfunc int bpf_test_inline_kfunc8(void) { return 0; }
+
+#endif /* __FOR_BPF not defined */
+
+MODULE_LICENSE("Dual BSD/GPL");
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c
index efd42c07f58a..730631603870 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c
@@ -78,6 +78,7 @@
#include "verifier_spill_fill.skel.h"
#include "verifier_spin_lock.skel.h"
#include "verifier_stack_ptr.skel.h"
+#include "verifier_inlinable_kfuncs.skel.h"
#include "verifier_subprog_precision.skel.h"
#include "verifier_subreg.skel.h"
#include "verifier_tailcall_jit.skel.h"
@@ -291,3 +292,9 @@ void test_verifier_value_ptr_arith(void)
verifier_value_ptr_arith__elf_bytes,
init_value_ptr_arith_maps);
}
+
+/* Do not drop CAP_SYS_ADMIN for these tests */
+void test_verifier_inlinable_kfuncs(void)
+{
+ RUN_TESTS(verifier_inlinable_kfuncs);
+}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_inlinable_kfuncs.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_inlinable_kfuncs.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..bd1cf5f5956c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_inlinable_kfuncs.c
@@ -0,0 +1,253 @@
+#include <linux/bpf.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_core_read.h>
+#include "bpf_misc.h"
+#include <stdbool.h>
+#include "bpf_kfuncs.h"
+
+extern int bpf_test_inline_kfunc1(int p) __ksym;
+extern int bpf_test_inline_kfunc2(int *p) __ksym;
+extern int bpf_test_inline_kfunc3(void *p, __u64 p__sz) __ksym;
+extern int bpf_test_inline_kfunc4(void) __ksym;
+extern int bpf_test_inline_kfunc5(const struct bpf_dynptr *p) __ksym;
+extern int bpf_test_inline_kfunc6(void) __ksym;
+extern int bpf_test_inline_kfunc7(void) __ksym;
+extern int bpf_test_inline_kfunc8(void) __ksym;
+
+SEC("socket")
+/* verify that scalar params are marked as precise */
+__log_level(2)
+/* first call to kfunc */
+__msg("1: (85) call bpf_test_inline_kfunc1")
+__msg("mark_precise: frame0: last_idx 1 first_idx 0 subseq_idx -1")
+__msg("mark_precise: frame0: regs=r1 stack= before 0: (b7) r1 = 1")
+/* second call to kfunc */
+__msg("3: (85) call bpf_test_inline_kfunc1")
+__msg("mark_precise: frame0: last_idx 3 first_idx 0 subseq_idx -1")
+__msg("mark_precise: frame0: regs=r1 stack= before 2: (b7) r1 = 2")
+/* check that dead code elimination took place independently for both callsites */
+__xlated("0: r1 = 1")
+__xlated("1: r0 = 42")
+__xlated("2: r0 = 11")
+__xlated("3: goto pc+0")
+__xlated("4: r1 = 2")
+__xlated("5: r0 = 42")
+__xlated("6: r0 = 22")
+__xlated("7: goto pc+0")
+__xlated("8: exit")
+__success
+__naked void two_callsites_scalar_param(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (
+ "r1 = 1;"
+ "call %[bpf_test_inline_kfunc1];"
+ "r1 = 2;"
+ "call %[bpf_test_inline_kfunc1];"
+ "exit;"
+ :
+ : __imm(bpf_test_inline_kfunc1)
+ : __clobber_all
+ );
+}
+
+SEC("socket")
+__xlated("0: r1 = 0")
+__xlated("1: r0 = 42")
+__xlated("2: r0 = 24")
+__xlated("3: goto pc+0")
+__xlated("4: exit")
+__success
+__naked void param_null(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (
+ "r1 = 0;"
+ "call %[bpf_test_inline_kfunc2];"
+ "exit;"
+ :
+ : __imm(bpf_test_inline_kfunc2)
+ : __clobber_all
+ );
+}
+
+SEC("socket")
+__xlated("0: r1 = r10")
+__xlated("1: r1 += -8")
+__xlated("2: r2 = 8")
+__xlated("3: r1 = *(u64 *)(r1 +0)")
+__xlated("4: *(u64 *)(r1 +0) = 42")
+__xlated("5: r0 = 0")
+__xlated("6: goto pc+0")
+__xlated("7: exit")
+__success
+__naked void param_kernel_value(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (
+ "r1 = r10;"
+ "r1 += -8;"
+ "r2 = 8;"
+ "call %[bpf_test_inline_kfunc3];"
+ "exit;"
+ :
+ : __imm(bpf_test_inline_kfunc3)
+ : __clobber_all
+ );
+}
+
+SEC("socket")
+__xlated("0: *(u64 *)(r10 -128) = r1")
+__xlated("1: *(u64 *)(r10 -136) = r6")
+__xlated("2: *(u64 *)(r10 -144) = r7")
+__xlated("3: r0 = 0")
+__xlated("4: r1 = 1")
+__xlated("5: r2 = 2")
+__xlated("6: r6 = 3")
+__xlated("7: r7 = 4")
+__xlated("8: goto pc+0")
+__xlated("9: r7 = *(u64 *)(r10 -144)")
+__xlated("10: r6 = *(u64 *)(r10 -136)")
+__xlated("11: r1 = *(u64 *)(r10 -128)")
+__xlated("12: exit")
+__success
+__naked void clobbered_regs(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (
+ "*(u64 *)(r10 - 128) = r1;"
+ "call %[bpf_test_inline_kfunc4];"
+ "r1 = *(u64 *)(r10 - 128);"
+ "exit;"
+ :
+ : __imm(bpf_test_inline_kfunc4)
+ : __clobber_all
+ );
+}
+
+SEC("socket")
+__xlated("0: *(u64 *)(r10 -32) = r1")
+__xlated("1: *(u64 *)(r10 -40) = r6")
+__xlated("2: r0 = 0")
+__xlated("3: *(u64 *)(r10 -48) = r0")
+__xlated("4: r0 = *(u64 *)(r10 -48)")
+__xlated("5: r6 = 1")
+__xlated("6: goto pc+0")
+__xlated("7: r6 = *(u64 *)(r10 -40)")
+__xlated("8: r1 = *(u64 *)(r10 -32)")
+__xlated("9: exit")
+__success
+__naked void clobbered_regs_and_stack(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (
+ "*(u64 *)(r10 - 32) = r1;"
+ "call %[bpf_test_inline_kfunc6];"
+ "r1 = *(u64 *)(r10 - 32);"
+ "exit;"
+ :
+ : __imm(bpf_test_inline_kfunc6)
+ : __clobber_all
+ );
+}
+
+SEC("socket")
+__xlated("0: call kernel-function")
+__xlated("1: exit")
+__success
+__naked void r10_escapes1(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (
+ "call %[bpf_test_inline_kfunc7];"
+ "exit;"
+ :
+ : __imm(bpf_test_inline_kfunc7)
+ : __clobber_all
+ );
+}
+
+SEC("socket")
+__xlated("0: call kernel-function")
+__xlated("1: exit")
+__success
+__naked void r10_escapes2(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (
+ "call %[bpf_test_inline_kfunc8];"
+ "exit;"
+ :
+ : __imm(bpf_test_inline_kfunc8)
+ : __clobber_all
+ );
+}
+
+SEC("xdp")
+__xlated("5: r1 = r10")
+__xlated("6: r1 += -16")
+__xlated("7: r1 = *(u32 *)(r1 +8)")
+__xlated("8: r1 &= ")
+__xlated("9: r1 >>= ")
+__xlated("10: r0 = 2")
+__xlated("11: goto pc+0")
+__xlated("12: exit")
+__success
+__naked void param_dynptr1(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (
+ "r1 = r1;"
+ "r2 = 0;"
+ "r3 = r10;"
+ "r3 += -16;"
+ "call %[bpf_dynptr_from_xdp];"
+ "r1 = r10;"
+ "r1 += -16;"
+ "call %[bpf_test_inline_kfunc5];"
+ "exit;"
+ :
+ : __imm(bpf_test_inline_kfunc5),
+ __imm(bpf_dynptr_from_xdp)
+ : __clobber_all
+ );
+}
+
+SEC("cgroup_skb/egress")
+__xlated("5: r1 = r10")
+__xlated("6: r1 += -16")
+__xlated("7: r1 = *(u32 *)(r1 +8)")
+__xlated("8: r1 &= ")
+__xlated("9: r1 >>= ")
+__xlated("10: r0 = 1")
+__xlated("11: goto pc+0")
+__xlated("12: r0 &= 3")
+__xlated("13: exit")
+__success
+__naked void param_dynptr2(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (
+ "r1 = r1;"
+ "r2 = 0;"
+ "r3 = r10;"
+ "r3 += -16;"
+ "call %[bpf_dynptr_from_skb];"
+ "r1 = r10;"
+ "r1 += -16;"
+ "call %[bpf_test_inline_kfunc5];"
+ "r0 &= 3;"
+ "exit;"
+ :
+ : __imm(bpf_test_inline_kfunc5),
+ __imm(bpf_dynptr_from_skb)
+ : __clobber_all
+ );
+}
+
+void __kfunc_btf_root(void)
+{
+ bpf_test_inline_kfunc1(0);
+ bpf_test_inline_kfunc2(0);
+ bpf_test_inline_kfunc3(0, 0);
+ bpf_test_inline_kfunc4();
+ bpf_test_inline_kfunc5(0);
+ bpf_test_inline_kfunc6();
+ bpf_test_inline_kfunc7();
+ bpf_test_inline_kfunc8();
+ bpf_dynptr_from_skb(0, 0, 0);
+ bpf_dynptr_from_xdp(0, 0, 0);
+}
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
--
2.47.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-07 17:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-07 17:50 [RFC bpf-next 00/11] bpf: inlinable kfuncs for BPF Eduard Zingerman
2024-11-07 17:50 ` [RFC bpf-next 01/11] bpf: use branch predictions in opt_hard_wire_dead_code_branches() Eduard Zingerman
2024-11-14 22:20 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-11-15 0:17 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-11-15 0:19 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-11-15 0:50 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-11-15 3:03 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-11-15 0:20 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-11-15 0:27 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-11-15 0:33 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-11-15 0:38 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-11-15 0:43 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-11-15 0:16 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-11-07 17:50 ` [RFC bpf-next 02/11] selftests/bpf: tests for opt_hard_wire_dead_code_branches() Eduard Zingerman
2024-11-07 17:50 ` [RFC bpf-next 03/11] bpf: shared BPF/native kfuncs Eduard Zingerman
2024-11-08 20:43 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2024-11-08 21:25 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-11-11 18:41 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2024-11-15 0:27 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-11-07 17:50 ` [RFC bpf-next 04/11] bpf: allow specifying inlinable kfuncs in modules Eduard Zingerman
2024-11-07 17:50 ` [RFC bpf-next 05/11] bpf: dynamic allocation for bpf_verifier_env->subprog_info Eduard Zingerman
2024-11-07 17:50 ` [RFC bpf-next 06/11] bpf: KERNEL_VALUE register type Eduard Zingerman
2024-11-07 17:50 ` [RFC bpf-next 07/11] bpf: instantiate inlinable kfuncs before verification Eduard Zingerman
2024-11-07 17:50 ` [RFC bpf-next 08/11] bpf: special rules for kernel function calls inside inlinable kfuncs Eduard Zingerman
2024-11-07 17:50 ` [RFC bpf-next 09/11] bpf: move selected dynptr kfuncs to inlinable_kfuncs.c Eduard Zingerman
2024-11-07 17:50 ` Eduard Zingerman [this message]
2024-11-07 22:04 ` [RFC bpf-next 10/11] selftests/bpf: tests to verify handling of inlined kfuncs Jeff Johnson
2024-11-07 22:08 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-11-07 22:19 ` Jeff Johnson
2024-11-07 23:00 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-11-07 17:50 ` [RFC bpf-next 11/11] selftests/bpf: dynptr_slice benchmark Eduard Zingerman
2024-11-08 20:41 ` [RFC bpf-next 00/11] bpf: inlinable kfuncs for BPF Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2024-11-08 23:01 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-11-11 18:42 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241107175040.1659341-11-eddyz87@gmail.com \
--to=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).