From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Vadim Fedorenko <vadfed@meta.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev>,
Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@fb.com>
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, x86@kernel.org,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v6 1/4] bpf: add bpf_get_cpu_cycles kfunc
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2024 06:55:17 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202411180657.c0eoNysc-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241115194841.2108634-2-vadfed@meta.com>
Hi Vadim,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on bpf-next/master]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Vadim-Fedorenko/bpf-add-bpf_get_cpu_cycles-kfunc/20241117-002106
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next.git master
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241115194841.2108634-2-vadfed%40meta.com
patch subject: [PATCH bpf-next v6 1/4] bpf: add bpf_get_cpu_cycles kfunc
config: x86_64-randconfig-075-20241117 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241118/202411180657.c0eoNysc-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: gcc-12 (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241118/202411180657.c0eoNysc-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202411180657.c0eoNysc-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
ld: vmlinux.o: in function `vread_pvclock':
>> arch/x86/include/asm/vdso/gettimeofday.h:198: undefined reference to `pvclock_page'
>> ld: arch/x86/include/asm/vdso/gettimeofday.h:198: undefined reference to `pvclock_page'
ld: vmlinux.o: in function `pvclock_read_begin':
>> arch/x86/include/asm/pvclock.h:25: undefined reference to `pvclock_page'
ld: vmlinux.o: in function `vread_pvclock':
arch/x86/include/asm/vdso/gettimeofday.h:228: undefined reference to `pvclock_page'
ld: vmlinux.o: in function `__pvclock_read_cycles':
arch/x86/include/asm/pvclock.h:86: undefined reference to `pvclock_page'
ld: vmlinux.o:arch/x86/include/asm/pvclock.h:88: more undefined references to `pvclock_page' follow
ld: .tmp_vmlinux1: hidden symbol `pvclock_page' isn't defined
ld: final link failed: bad value
vim +198 arch/x86/include/asm/vdso/gettimeofday.h
7ac8707479886c Vincenzo Frascino 2019-06-21 195
7ac8707479886c Vincenzo Frascino 2019-06-21 196 #ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT_CLOCK
7ac8707479886c Vincenzo Frascino 2019-06-21 197 static u64 vread_pvclock(void)
7ac8707479886c Vincenzo Frascino 2019-06-21 @198 {
ecf9db3d1f1a8f Andy Lutomirski 2019-06-22 199 const struct pvclock_vcpu_time_info *pvti = &pvclock_page.pvti;
7ac8707479886c Vincenzo Frascino 2019-06-21 200 u32 version;
7ac8707479886c Vincenzo Frascino 2019-06-21 201 u64 ret;
7ac8707479886c Vincenzo Frascino 2019-06-21 202
7ac8707479886c Vincenzo Frascino 2019-06-21 203 /*
7ac8707479886c Vincenzo Frascino 2019-06-21 204 * Note: The kernel and hypervisor must guarantee that cpu ID
7ac8707479886c Vincenzo Frascino 2019-06-21 205 * number maps 1:1 to per-CPU pvclock time info.
7ac8707479886c Vincenzo Frascino 2019-06-21 206 *
7ac8707479886c Vincenzo Frascino 2019-06-21 207 * Because the hypervisor is entirely unaware of guest userspace
7ac8707479886c Vincenzo Frascino 2019-06-21 208 * preemption, it cannot guarantee that per-CPU pvclock time
7ac8707479886c Vincenzo Frascino 2019-06-21 209 * info is updated if the underlying CPU changes or that that
7ac8707479886c Vincenzo Frascino 2019-06-21 210 * version is increased whenever underlying CPU changes.
7ac8707479886c Vincenzo Frascino 2019-06-21 211 *
7ac8707479886c Vincenzo Frascino 2019-06-21 212 * On KVM, we are guaranteed that pvti updates for any vCPU are
7ac8707479886c Vincenzo Frascino 2019-06-21 213 * atomic as seen by *all* vCPUs. This is an even stronger
7ac8707479886c Vincenzo Frascino 2019-06-21 214 * guarantee than we get with a normal seqlock.
7ac8707479886c Vincenzo Frascino 2019-06-21 215 *
7ac8707479886c Vincenzo Frascino 2019-06-21 216 * On Xen, we don't appear to have that guarantee, but Xen still
7ac8707479886c Vincenzo Frascino 2019-06-21 217 * supplies a valid seqlock using the version field.
7ac8707479886c Vincenzo Frascino 2019-06-21 218 *
7ac8707479886c Vincenzo Frascino 2019-06-21 219 * We only do pvclock vdso timing at all if
7ac8707479886c Vincenzo Frascino 2019-06-21 220 * PVCLOCK_TSC_STABLE_BIT is set, and we interpret that bit to
7ac8707479886c Vincenzo Frascino 2019-06-21 221 * mean that all vCPUs have matching pvti and that the TSC is
7ac8707479886c Vincenzo Frascino 2019-06-21 222 * synced, so we can just look at vCPU 0's pvti.
7ac8707479886c Vincenzo Frascino 2019-06-21 223 */
7ac8707479886c Vincenzo Frascino 2019-06-21 224
7ac8707479886c Vincenzo Frascino 2019-06-21 225 do {
7ac8707479886c Vincenzo Frascino 2019-06-21 226 version = pvclock_read_begin(pvti);
7ac8707479886c Vincenzo Frascino 2019-06-21 227
7ac8707479886c Vincenzo Frascino 2019-06-21 228 if (unlikely(!(pvti->flags & PVCLOCK_TSC_STABLE_BIT)))
7ac8707479886c Vincenzo Frascino 2019-06-21 229 return U64_MAX;
7ac8707479886c Vincenzo Frascino 2019-06-21 230
7ac8707479886c Vincenzo Frascino 2019-06-21 231 ret = __pvclock_read_cycles(pvti, rdtsc_ordered());
7ac8707479886c Vincenzo Frascino 2019-06-21 232 } while (pvclock_read_retry(pvti, version));
7ac8707479886c Vincenzo Frascino 2019-06-21 233
77750f78b0b324 Peter Zijlstra 2023-05-19 234 return ret & S64_MAX;
7ac8707479886c Vincenzo Frascino 2019-06-21 235 }
7ac8707479886c Vincenzo Frascino 2019-06-21 236 #endif
7ac8707479886c Vincenzo Frascino 2019-06-21 237
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-17 22:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-15 19:48 [PATCH bpf-next v6 0/4] bpf: add cpu cycles kfuncss Vadim Fedorenko
2024-11-15 19:48 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 1/4] bpf: add bpf_get_cpu_cycles kfunc Vadim Fedorenko
2024-11-15 21:54 ` Yonghong Song
2024-11-17 18:11 ` Vadim Fedorenko
2024-11-17 21:58 ` Yonghong Song
2024-11-17 5:58 ` kernel test robot
2024-11-17 22:55 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2024-11-15 19:48 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 2/4] bpf: add bpf_cpu_cycles_to_ns helper Vadim Fedorenko
2024-11-15 19:48 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 3/4] selftests/bpf: add selftest to check rdtsc jit Vadim Fedorenko
2024-11-15 19:48 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 4/4] selftests/bpf: add usage example for cpu cycles kfuncs Vadim Fedorenko
2024-11-15 20:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 0/4] bpf: add cpu cycles kfuncss Borislav Petkov
2024-11-15 20:30 ` Vadim Fedorenko
2024-11-15 22:21 ` Andrii Nakryiko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202411180657.c0eoNysc-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=mykolal@fb.com \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vadfed@meta.com \
--cc=vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox