BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Vadim Fedorenko <vadfed@meta.com>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev>,
	Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@fb.com>
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, x86@kernel.org,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org, Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v6 1/4] bpf: add bpf_get_cpu_cycles kfunc
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2024 06:55:17 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202411180657.c0eoNysc-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241115194841.2108634-2-vadfed@meta.com>

Hi Vadim,

kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:

[auto build test ERROR on bpf-next/master]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Vadim-Fedorenko/bpf-add-bpf_get_cpu_cycles-kfunc/20241117-002106
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next.git master
patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241115194841.2108634-2-vadfed%40meta.com
patch subject: [PATCH bpf-next v6 1/4] bpf: add bpf_get_cpu_cycles kfunc
config: x86_64-randconfig-075-20241117 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241118/202411180657.c0eoNysc-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: gcc-12 (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241118/202411180657.c0eoNysc-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202411180657.c0eoNysc-lkp@intel.com/

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   ld: vmlinux.o: in function `vread_pvclock':
>> arch/x86/include/asm/vdso/gettimeofday.h:198: undefined reference to `pvclock_page'
>> ld: arch/x86/include/asm/vdso/gettimeofday.h:198: undefined reference to `pvclock_page'
   ld: vmlinux.o: in function `pvclock_read_begin':
>> arch/x86/include/asm/pvclock.h:25: undefined reference to `pvclock_page'
   ld: vmlinux.o: in function `vread_pvclock':
   arch/x86/include/asm/vdso/gettimeofday.h:228: undefined reference to `pvclock_page'
   ld: vmlinux.o: in function `__pvclock_read_cycles':
   arch/x86/include/asm/pvclock.h:86: undefined reference to `pvclock_page'
   ld: vmlinux.o:arch/x86/include/asm/pvclock.h:88: more undefined references to `pvclock_page' follow
   ld: .tmp_vmlinux1: hidden symbol `pvclock_page' isn't defined
   ld: final link failed: bad value


vim +198 arch/x86/include/asm/vdso/gettimeofday.h

7ac8707479886c Vincenzo Frascino 2019-06-21  195  
7ac8707479886c Vincenzo Frascino 2019-06-21  196  #ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT_CLOCK
7ac8707479886c Vincenzo Frascino 2019-06-21  197  static u64 vread_pvclock(void)
7ac8707479886c Vincenzo Frascino 2019-06-21 @198  {
ecf9db3d1f1a8f Andy Lutomirski   2019-06-22  199  	const struct pvclock_vcpu_time_info *pvti = &pvclock_page.pvti;
7ac8707479886c Vincenzo Frascino 2019-06-21  200  	u32 version;
7ac8707479886c Vincenzo Frascino 2019-06-21  201  	u64 ret;
7ac8707479886c Vincenzo Frascino 2019-06-21  202  
7ac8707479886c Vincenzo Frascino 2019-06-21  203  	/*
7ac8707479886c Vincenzo Frascino 2019-06-21  204  	 * Note: The kernel and hypervisor must guarantee that cpu ID
7ac8707479886c Vincenzo Frascino 2019-06-21  205  	 * number maps 1:1 to per-CPU pvclock time info.
7ac8707479886c Vincenzo Frascino 2019-06-21  206  	 *
7ac8707479886c Vincenzo Frascino 2019-06-21  207  	 * Because the hypervisor is entirely unaware of guest userspace
7ac8707479886c Vincenzo Frascino 2019-06-21  208  	 * preemption, it cannot guarantee that per-CPU pvclock time
7ac8707479886c Vincenzo Frascino 2019-06-21  209  	 * info is updated if the underlying CPU changes or that that
7ac8707479886c Vincenzo Frascino 2019-06-21  210  	 * version is increased whenever underlying CPU changes.
7ac8707479886c Vincenzo Frascino 2019-06-21  211  	 *
7ac8707479886c Vincenzo Frascino 2019-06-21  212  	 * On KVM, we are guaranteed that pvti updates for any vCPU are
7ac8707479886c Vincenzo Frascino 2019-06-21  213  	 * atomic as seen by *all* vCPUs.  This is an even stronger
7ac8707479886c Vincenzo Frascino 2019-06-21  214  	 * guarantee than we get with a normal seqlock.
7ac8707479886c Vincenzo Frascino 2019-06-21  215  	 *
7ac8707479886c Vincenzo Frascino 2019-06-21  216  	 * On Xen, we don't appear to have that guarantee, but Xen still
7ac8707479886c Vincenzo Frascino 2019-06-21  217  	 * supplies a valid seqlock using the version field.
7ac8707479886c Vincenzo Frascino 2019-06-21  218  	 *
7ac8707479886c Vincenzo Frascino 2019-06-21  219  	 * We only do pvclock vdso timing at all if
7ac8707479886c Vincenzo Frascino 2019-06-21  220  	 * PVCLOCK_TSC_STABLE_BIT is set, and we interpret that bit to
7ac8707479886c Vincenzo Frascino 2019-06-21  221  	 * mean that all vCPUs have matching pvti and that the TSC is
7ac8707479886c Vincenzo Frascino 2019-06-21  222  	 * synced, so we can just look at vCPU 0's pvti.
7ac8707479886c Vincenzo Frascino 2019-06-21  223  	 */
7ac8707479886c Vincenzo Frascino 2019-06-21  224  
7ac8707479886c Vincenzo Frascino 2019-06-21  225  	do {
7ac8707479886c Vincenzo Frascino 2019-06-21  226  		version = pvclock_read_begin(pvti);
7ac8707479886c Vincenzo Frascino 2019-06-21  227  
7ac8707479886c Vincenzo Frascino 2019-06-21  228  		if (unlikely(!(pvti->flags & PVCLOCK_TSC_STABLE_BIT)))
7ac8707479886c Vincenzo Frascino 2019-06-21  229  			return U64_MAX;
7ac8707479886c Vincenzo Frascino 2019-06-21  230  
7ac8707479886c Vincenzo Frascino 2019-06-21  231  		ret = __pvclock_read_cycles(pvti, rdtsc_ordered());
7ac8707479886c Vincenzo Frascino 2019-06-21  232  	} while (pvclock_read_retry(pvti, version));
7ac8707479886c Vincenzo Frascino 2019-06-21  233  
77750f78b0b324 Peter Zijlstra    2023-05-19  234  	return ret & S64_MAX;
7ac8707479886c Vincenzo Frascino 2019-06-21  235  }
7ac8707479886c Vincenzo Frascino 2019-06-21  236  #endif
7ac8707479886c Vincenzo Frascino 2019-06-21  237  

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-11-17 22:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-11-15 19:48 [PATCH bpf-next v6 0/4] bpf: add cpu cycles kfuncss Vadim Fedorenko
2024-11-15 19:48 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 1/4] bpf: add bpf_get_cpu_cycles kfunc Vadim Fedorenko
2024-11-15 21:54   ` Yonghong Song
2024-11-17 18:11     ` Vadim Fedorenko
2024-11-17 21:58       ` Yonghong Song
2024-11-17  5:58   ` kernel test robot
2024-11-17 22:55   ` kernel test robot [this message]
2024-11-15 19:48 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 2/4] bpf: add bpf_cpu_cycles_to_ns helper Vadim Fedorenko
2024-11-15 19:48 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 3/4] selftests/bpf: add selftest to check rdtsc jit Vadim Fedorenko
2024-11-15 19:48 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 4/4] selftests/bpf: add usage example for cpu cycles kfuncs Vadim Fedorenko
2024-11-15 20:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 0/4] bpf: add cpu cycles kfuncss Borislav Petkov
2024-11-15 20:30   ` Vadim Fedorenko
2024-11-15 22:21 ` Andrii Nakryiko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202411180657.c0eoNysc-lkp@intel.com \
    --to=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=mykolal@fb.com \
    --cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vadfed@meta.com \
    --cc=vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox