BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kkd@meta.com, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>,
	Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
	Manu Bretelle <chantra@meta.com>,
	kernel-team@fb.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf v3 0/3] Fix for raw_tp PTR_MAYBE_NULL handling
Date: Fri,  6 Dec 2024 08:10:50 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241206161053.809580-1-memxor@gmail.com> (raw)

A production BPF program had the following code produced by LLVM.

r0 = 1024;
r1 = ...; // r1 = trusted_or_null_(id=1)
r3 = r1;  // r3 = trusted_or_null_(id=1) r1 = trusted_or_null_(id=1)
r3 += r0; // r3 = trusted_or_null_(id=1, off=1024)
if r1 == 0 goto pc+X;

After cb4158ce8ec8 ("bpf: Mark raw_tp arguments with PTR_MAYBE_NULL"),
the production BPF program began throwing a warning in the verifier
because for the code above, when unmarking null mark from r1, the
verifier will notice another register r3 with same id but off != 0,
which is unexpected, since offset modification on PTR_MAYBE_NULL is not
permitted, but the aforementioned commit relaxed that restriction to
preserve compatibility with non-NULL raw_tp args.

Another production program hit a case where generic code it was calling
into would perform a NULL check, while the program knows and is written
with the knowledge that the raw_tp arg can never be NULL.

In earlier versions before the raw_tp change, verifier would never walk
the path where raw_tp arg was seen as scalar zero, but now it will,
hence code in the program that operates on the raw_tp arg later on will
fail on dereferencing a scalar.

Provide a fix to suppress the warning for raw_tp args, and not mark NULL
checked raw_tp args as scalars. We will follow up with a more generic
fix to handle such patterns for all pointer types in the verifier, which
currently involves playing whack-a-mole with suppressing such LLVM
optimizations and reworking BPF programs to avoid verifier errors.

Changelog:
----------
v2 -> v3
v2: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20241205223152.2434683-1-memxor@gmail.com

 * Add Acked-by for Patch 1
 * Add fix for scalar dereference issue
 * Roll both fixes into one, as second fix undoes first
 * Fix nits

v1 -> v2
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20241204024154.21386-1-memxor@gmail.com

 * Fix eager unmarking bug (Eduard)
 * Generalize approach, always unmark NULL when off == 0 is checked
 * Make NULL check noop if operand has off != 0
 * Do not reset id when treating as noop
 * Trim comment (Alexei)
 * Adjust selftests

Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi (3):
  bpf: Suppress warning for non-zero off raw_tp arg NULL check
  bpf: Do not mark NULL-checked raw_tp arg as scalar
  selftests/bpf: Add raw_tp tests for PTR_MAYBE_NULL marking

 kernel/bpf/verifier.c                         | 44 +++++++--
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/raw_tp_null.c    |  6 ++
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/raw_tp_null_fail.c    | 90 +++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 133 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/raw_tp_null_fail.c


base-commit: 5a6ea7022ff4d2a65ae328619c586d6a8909b48b
-- 
2.43.5


             reply	other threads:[~2024-12-06 16:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-12-06 16:10 Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi [this message]
2024-12-06 16:10 ` [PATCH bpf v3 1/3] bpf: Suppress warning for non-zero off raw_tp arg NULL check Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2024-12-06 16:10 ` [PATCH bpf v3 2/3] bpf: Do not mark NULL-checked raw_tp arg as scalar Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2024-12-06 17:59   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-12-06 18:10     ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2024-12-06 18:37       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-12-06 19:09         ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2024-12-06 19:14           ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-12-09 23:35       ` Jiri Olsa
2024-12-06 18:15     ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-12-06 18:24       ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2024-12-06 18:36       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-12-06 19:10         ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2024-12-06 19:18           ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-12-06 16:10 ` [PATCH bpf v3 3/3] selftests/bpf: Add raw_tp tests for PTR_MAYBE_NULL marking Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20241206161053.809580-1-memxor@gmail.com \
    --to=memxor@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=chantra@meta.com \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=kkd@meta.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox