From: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 16/22] ublk: bpf: add bpf aio struct_ops
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2025 20:04:07 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250107120417.1237392-17-tom.leiming@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250107120417.1237392-1-tom.leiming@gmail.com>
Add bpf aio struct_ops, so that application code can provide bpf
aio completion callback in the struct_ops prog, then bpf aio can be
supported.
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>
---
drivers/block/ublk/Makefile | 2 +-
drivers/block/ublk/bpf_aio.c | 7 ++
drivers/block/ublk/bpf_aio.h | 12 +++
drivers/block/ublk/bpf_aio_ops.c | 152 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
4 files changed, 172 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
create mode 100644 drivers/block/ublk/bpf_aio_ops.c
diff --git a/drivers/block/ublk/Makefile b/drivers/block/ublk/Makefile
index 7094607c040d..a47f65eb97f8 100644
--- a/drivers/block/ublk/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/block/ublk/Makefile
@@ -5,6 +5,6 @@ ccflags-y += -I$(src)
ublk_drv-$(CONFIG_BLK_DEV_UBLK) := main.o
ifeq ($(CONFIG_UBLK_BPF), y)
-ublk_drv-$(CONFIG_BLK_DEV_UBLK) += bpf_ops.o bpf.o bpf_aio.o
+ublk_drv-$(CONFIG_BLK_DEV_UBLK) += bpf_ops.o bpf.o bpf_aio.o bpf_aio_ops.o
endif
obj-$(CONFIG_BLK_DEV_UBLK) += ublk_drv.o
diff --git a/drivers/block/ublk/bpf_aio.c b/drivers/block/ublk/bpf_aio.c
index 65013fe8054f..6e93f28f389b 100644
--- a/drivers/block/ublk/bpf_aio.c
+++ b/drivers/block/ublk/bpf_aio.c
@@ -243,9 +243,16 @@ __bpf_kfunc int bpf_aio_submit(struct bpf_aio *aio, int fd, loff_t pos,
int __init bpf_aio_init(void)
{
+ int err;
+
bpf_aio_cachep = KMEM_CACHE(bpf_aio, SLAB_PANIC);
bpf_aio_work_cachep = KMEM_CACHE(bpf_aio_work, SLAB_PANIC);
bpf_aio_wq = alloc_workqueue("bpf_aio", WQ_MEM_RECLAIM | WQ_HIGHPRI, 0);
+ err = bpf_aio_struct_ops_init();
+ if (err) {
+ pr_warn("error while initializing bpf aio struct_ops: %d", err);
+ return err;
+ }
return 0;
}
diff --git a/drivers/block/ublk/bpf_aio.h b/drivers/block/ublk/bpf_aio.h
index 625737965c90..07fcd43fd2ac 100644
--- a/drivers/block/ublk/bpf_aio.h
+++ b/drivers/block/ublk/bpf_aio.h
@@ -3,6 +3,8 @@
#ifndef UBLK_BPF_AIO_HEADER
#define UBLK_BPF_AIO_HEADER
+#include "bpf_reg.h"
+
#define BPF_AIO_OP_BITS 8
#define BPF_AIO_OP_MASK ((1 << BPF_AIO_OP_BITS) - 1)
@@ -47,9 +49,18 @@ struct bpf_aio {
typedef void (*bpf_aio_complete_t)(struct bpf_aio *io, long ret);
+/**
+ * struct bpf_aio_complete_ops - A BPF struct_ops of callbacks allowing to
+ * complete `bpf_aio` submitted by `bpf_aio_submit()`
+ * @id: id used by bpf aio consumer, defined by globally
+ * @bpf_aio_complete_cb: callback for completing submitted `bpf_aio`
+ * @provider: holding all consumers of this struct_ops prog, used by
+ * kernel only
+ */
struct bpf_aio_complete_ops {
unsigned int id;
bpf_aio_complete_t bpf_aio_complete_cb;
+ struct bpf_prog_provider provider;
};
static inline unsigned int bpf_aio_get_op(const struct bpf_aio *aio)
@@ -58,6 +69,7 @@ static inline unsigned int bpf_aio_get_op(const struct bpf_aio *aio)
}
int bpf_aio_init(void);
+int bpf_aio_struct_ops_init(void);
struct bpf_aio *bpf_aio_alloc(unsigned int op, enum bpf_aio_flag aio_flags);
struct bpf_aio *bpf_aio_alloc_sleepable(unsigned int op, enum bpf_aio_flag aio_flags);
void bpf_aio_release(struct bpf_aio *aio);
diff --git a/drivers/block/ublk/bpf_aio_ops.c b/drivers/block/ublk/bpf_aio_ops.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..12757f634dbd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/block/ublk/bpf_aio_ops.c
@@ -0,0 +1,152 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/* Copyright (c) 2024 Red Hat */
+
+#include <linux/init.h>
+#include <linux/types.h>
+#include <linux/bpf_verifier.h>
+#include <linux/bpf.h>
+#include <linux/btf.h>
+#include <linux/btf_ids.h>
+#include <linux/filter.h>
+#include <linux/xarray.h>
+
+#include "bpf_aio.h"
+
+static DEFINE_XARRAY(bpf_aio_all_ops);
+static DEFINE_MUTEX(bpf_aio_ops_lock);
+
+static bool bpf_aio_ops_is_valid_access(int off, int size,
+ enum bpf_access_type type, const struct bpf_prog *prog,
+ struct bpf_insn_access_aux *info)
+{
+ return bpf_tracing_btf_ctx_access(off, size, type, prog, info);
+}
+
+static int bpf_aio_ops_btf_struct_access(struct bpf_verifier_log *log,
+ const struct bpf_reg_state *reg,
+ int off, int size)
+{
+ /* bpf_aio prog can change nothing */
+ if (size > 0)
+ return -EACCES;
+
+ return NOT_INIT;
+}
+
+static const struct bpf_verifier_ops bpf_aio_verifier_ops = {
+ .get_func_proto = bpf_base_func_proto,
+ .is_valid_access = bpf_aio_ops_is_valid_access,
+ .btf_struct_access = bpf_aio_ops_btf_struct_access,
+};
+
+static int bpf_aio_ops_init(struct btf *btf)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int bpf_aio_ops_check_member(const struct btf_type *t,
+ const struct btf_member *member,
+ const struct bpf_prog *prog)
+{
+ if (prog->sleepable)
+ return -EINVAL;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int bpf_aio_ops_init_member(const struct btf_type *t,
+ const struct btf_member *member,
+ void *kdata, const void *udata)
+{
+ const struct bpf_aio_complete_ops *uops;
+ struct bpf_aio_complete_ops *kops;
+ u32 moff;
+
+ uops = (const struct bpf_aio_complete_ops *)udata;
+ kops = (struct bpf_aio_complete_ops*)kdata;
+
+ moff = __btf_member_bit_offset(t, member) / 8;
+
+ switch (moff) {
+ case offsetof(struct bpf_aio_complete_ops, id):
+ /* For dev_id, this function has to copy it and return 1 to
+ * indicate that the data has been handled by the struct_ops
+ * type, or the verifier will reject the map if the value of
+ * those fields is not zero.
+ */
+ kops->id = uops->id;
+ return 1;
+ }
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int bpf_aio_reg(void *kdata, struct bpf_link *link)
+{
+ struct bpf_aio_complete_ops *ops = kdata;
+ struct bpf_aio_complete_ops *curr;
+ int ret = -EBUSY;
+
+ mutex_lock(&bpf_aio_ops_lock);
+ if (!xa_load(&bpf_aio_all_ops, ops->id)) {
+ curr = kmalloc(sizeof(*curr), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (curr) {
+ *curr = *ops;
+ bpf_prog_provider_init(&curr->provider);
+ ret = xa_err(xa_store(&bpf_aio_all_ops, ops->id,
+ curr, GFP_KERNEL));
+ } else {
+ ret = -ENOMEM;
+ }
+ }
+ mutex_unlock(&bpf_aio_ops_lock);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static void bpf_aio_unreg(void *kdata, struct bpf_link *link)
+{
+ struct bpf_aio_complete_ops *ops = kdata;
+ struct bpf_prog_consumer *consumer, *tmp;
+ struct bpf_aio_complete_ops *curr;
+ LIST_HEAD(consumer_list);
+
+ mutex_lock(&bpf_aio_ops_lock);
+ curr = xa_erase(&bpf_aio_all_ops, ops->id);
+ if (curr)
+ list_splice_init(&curr->provider.list, &consumer_list);
+ mutex_unlock(&bpf_aio_ops_lock);
+
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(consumer, tmp, &consumer_list, node)
+ bpf_prog_consumer_detach(consumer, true);
+ kfree(curr);
+}
+
+static void bpf_aio_cb(struct bpf_aio *io, long ret)
+{
+}
+
+static struct bpf_aio_complete_ops __bpf_aio_ops = {
+ .bpf_aio_complete_cb = bpf_aio_cb,
+};
+
+static struct bpf_struct_ops bpf_aio_ops = {
+ .verifier_ops = &bpf_aio_verifier_ops,
+ .init = bpf_aio_ops_init,
+ .check_member = bpf_aio_ops_check_member,
+ .init_member = bpf_aio_ops_init_member,
+ .reg = bpf_aio_reg,
+ .unreg = bpf_aio_unreg,
+ .name = "bpf_aio_complete_ops",
+ .cfi_stubs = &__bpf_aio_ops,
+ .owner = THIS_MODULE,
+};
+
+int __init bpf_aio_struct_ops_init(void)
+{
+ int err;
+
+ err = register_bpf_struct_ops(&bpf_aio_ops, bpf_aio_complete_ops);
+ if (err)
+ pr_warn("error while registering bpf aio struct ops: %d", err);
+
+ return 0;
+}
--
2.47.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-07 12:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-07 12:03 [RFC PATCH 00/22] ublk: support bpf Ming Lei
2025-01-07 12:03 ` [RFC PATCH 01/22] ublk: remove two unused fields from 'struct ublk_queue' Ming Lei
2025-01-07 12:03 ` [RFC PATCH 02/22] ublk: convert several bool type fields into bitfield of `ublk_queue` Ming Lei
2025-01-07 12:03 ` [RFC PATCH 03/22] ublk: add helper of ublk_need_map_io() Ming Lei
2025-01-07 12:03 ` [RFC PATCH 04/22] ublk: move ublk into one standalone directory Ming Lei
2025-01-07 12:03 ` [RFC PATCH 05/22] ublk: move private definitions into private header Ming Lei
2025-01-07 12:03 ` [RFC PATCH 06/22] ublk: move several helpers to " Ming Lei
2025-01-07 12:03 ` [RFC PATCH 07/22] ublk: bpf: add bpf prog attach helpers Ming Lei
2025-01-07 12:03 ` [RFC PATCH 08/22] ublk: bpf: add bpf struct_ops Ming Lei
2025-01-10 1:43 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-01-13 4:08 ` Ming Lei
2025-01-13 21:30 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-01-15 11:58 ` Ming Lei
2025-01-15 20:11 ` Amery Hung
2025-01-07 12:04 ` [RFC PATCH 09/22] ublk: bpf: attach bpf prog to ublk device Ming Lei
2025-01-07 12:04 ` [RFC PATCH 10/22] ublk: bpf: add kfunc for ublk bpf prog Ming Lei
2025-01-07 12:04 ` [RFC PATCH 11/22] ublk: bpf: enable ublk-bpf Ming Lei
2025-01-07 12:04 ` [RFC PATCH 12/22] selftests: ublk: add tests for the ublk-bpf initial implementation Ming Lei
2025-01-07 12:04 ` [RFC PATCH 13/22] selftests: ublk: add tests for covering io split Ming Lei
2025-01-07 12:04 ` [RFC PATCH 14/22] selftests: ublk: add tests for covering redirecting to userspace Ming Lei
2025-01-07 12:04 ` [RFC PATCH 15/22] ublk: bpf: add bpf aio kfunc Ming Lei
2025-01-07 12:04 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2025-01-07 12:04 ` [RFC PATCH 17/22] ublk: bpf: attach bpf aio prog to ublk device Ming Lei
2025-01-07 12:04 ` [RFC PATCH 18/22] ublk: bpf: add several ublk bpf aio kfuncs Ming Lei
2025-01-07 12:04 ` [RFC PATCH 19/22] ublk: bpf: wire bpf aio with ublk io handling Ming Lei
2025-01-07 12:04 ` [RFC PATCH 20/22] selftests: add tests for ublk bpf aio Ming Lei
2025-01-07 12:04 ` [RFC PATCH 21/22] selftests: add tests for covering both bpf aio and split Ming Lei
2025-01-07 12:04 ` [RFC PATCH 22/22] ublk: document ublk-bpf & bpf-aio Ming Lei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250107120417.1237392-17-tom.leiming@gmail.com \
--to=tom.leiming@gmail.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox