From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B7FE620C028; Wed, 5 Feb 2025 03:14:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1738725275; cv=none; b=I7xiSGavVDdnW/FBxr3PxGL4s3BlxkYTN2RIo2z2hjH5N7aelCyEtt9LKL13qmj8GHYf+ZKWTJG5Q86JkDGmRWanmE3sVDO/0TUEx7dnBNn6P472RZIq7Te+LsRUNN5efBtZGPm+PGwb39/p8ecBc7SY4qDz+45bZEvshfd27Zg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1738725275; c=relaxed/simple; bh=IFu/NvdoTuUeKbEz/IgQfYMFmAnUREC7EusYfwrBa3o=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=IF3tCh8dkz5FYG1iYlDNJ7gVv899q4r30p8hjx5JNH+IB+bFh8ajnG42F3x/GKsfVsOfqw5ZvzyZUWADTlPolFz4Suojk+vBVgA15xUP6C00Q5+epnwystARMsvj/rz5lSKfd9C4c9YkKri2JhlwDV3yGunilLx7v1udGaqfDFM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=PJjfKl8q; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="PJjfKl8q" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EEC9EC4CEDF; Wed, 5 Feb 2025 03:14:33 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1738725275; bh=IFu/NvdoTuUeKbEz/IgQfYMFmAnUREC7EusYfwrBa3o=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=PJjfKl8qaFD2u3eMQapgpW4oid2OEiXML8jyFb/q64WKsQuPDphmW7H8OfU3IMMTO y0sBykutoFzm6xJ/qrEwSRsWLPK7pvrLLyLdN7/vFb6wE81cNO/RKpgEW/MAb8F85M 8vAAP8ORTmphAPnRz3RUXrTmMyzopp+WXZ8ewPBokB66Ib/nubiiw0cKHjr/nx0jZU BgBkK6p3MupSIPkmJELER/jZSROsAMyBjZ242+AUjQ159W1mkMgfobg8HT+XIv45eU 2JpUVkz/jG6jmtjgcmsF8IeSUX/IhIxGRcNRJ7iYxftaWieM6spYKkh/PlXRdvUMCA TJ+1XX+yLd87A== Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2025 19:14:33 -0800 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Jason Xing Cc: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com, dsahern@kernel.org, willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com, willemb@google.com, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev, eddyz87@gmail.com, song@kernel.org, yonghong.song@linux.dev, john.fastabend@gmail.com, kpsingh@kernel.org, sdf@fomichev.me, haoluo@google.com, jolsa@kernel.org, horms@kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v8 05/12] net-timestamp: prepare for isolating two modes of SO_TIMESTAMPING Message-ID: <20250204191433.4cfa990a@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20250204183024.87508-1-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com> <20250204183024.87508-6-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com> <20250204174750.677e3520@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 5 Feb 2025 10:40:42 +0800 Jason Xing wrote: > I wonder if we need a separate cleanup after this series about moving > this kind of functions into net/core/timestamping.c, say, > __skb_tstamp_tx()? IMHO no need to go too far, just move the one function as part of this series. The only motivation is to avoid adding includes to linux/skbuff.h since skbuff.h is included in something like 8k objects.