From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>, bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
Networking <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the bpf-next tree with the bpf tree
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2025 16:07:14 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250214160714.4cd44261@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1203 bytes --]
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the bpf-next tree got a conflict in:
kernel/bpf/btf.c
between commit:
5da7e15fb5a1 ("net: Add rx_skb of kfree_skb to raw_tp_null_args[].")
from the bpf tree and commit:
c83e2d970bae ("bpf: Add tracepoints with null-able arguments")
from the bpf-next tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
diff --cc kernel/bpf/btf.c
index c3223e0db2f5,f8335bdc8bf8..000000000000
--- a/kernel/bpf/btf.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
@@@ -6507,8 -6505,8 +6505,10 @@@ static const struct bpf_raw_tp_null_arg
/* rxrpc */
{ "rxrpc_recvdata", 0x1 },
{ "rxrpc_resend", 0x10 },
+ { "rxrpc_tq", 0x10 },
+ { "rxrpc_client", 0x1 },
+ /* skb */
+ {"kfree_skb", 0x1000},
/* sunrpc */
{ "xs_stream_read_data", 0x1 },
/* ... from xprt_cong_event event class */
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2025-02-14 5:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-14 5:07 Stephen Rothwell [this message]
2025-02-14 5:33 ` linux-next: manual merge of the bpf-next tree with the bpf tree Alexei Starovoitov
2025-02-14 5:40 ` Stephen Rothwell
2025-02-14 9:12 ` Jiri Olsa
2025-02-14 18:50 ` Alexei Starovoitov
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-04-01 12:29 Mark Brown
2026-04-01 15:27 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-02-24 12:39 Mark Brown
2026-02-24 16:22 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-11-06 0:35 Stephen Rothwell
2025-11-06 17:57 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-03-07 1:40 Stephen Rothwell
2023-03-06 22:58 Stephen Rothwell
2023-03-10 0:38 ` Stephen Rothwell
2023-03-10 3:18 ` Bagas Sanjaya
2022-11-21 1:27 Stephen Rothwell
2022-08-26 1:46 Stephen Rothwell
2022-08-25 0:50 Stephen Rothwell
2022-08-22 1:01 Stephen Rothwell
2021-12-05 23:39 Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250214160714.4cd44261@canb.auug.org.au \
--to=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kuniyu@amazon.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox