From: "Alexis Lothoré (eBPF Foundation)" <alexis.lothore@bootlin.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>, Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>,
Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@fb.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: "Masami Hiramatsu" <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
"Bastien Curutchet" <bastien.curutchet@bootlin.com>,
ebpf@linuxfoundation.org,
"Thomas Petazzoni" <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Alexis Lothoré (eBPF Foundation)" <alexis.lothore@bootlin.com>
Subject: [PATCH] selftests/bpf: DENYLIST.aarch64: enable kprobe_multi tests for ARM64
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2025 20:41:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250219-enable_kprobe_multi_tests-v1-1-faeec99240c8@bootlin.com> (raw)
The kprobe_multi feature was disabled on ARM64 due to the lack of fprobe
support.
The fprobe rewrite on function_graph has been recently merged and thus
brought support for fprobes on arm64. This then enables kprobe_multi
support on arm64, and so the corresponding tests can now be run on this
architecture.
Remove the tests depending on kprobe_multi from DENYLIST.aarch64 to
allow those to run in CI. CONFIG_FPROBE is already correctly set in
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/config
Signed-off-by: Alexis Lothoré (eBPF Foundation) <alexis.lothore@bootlin.com>
---
The tests being enabled with this series have been run locally in an
ARM64 qemu environment, and in Github CI.
I only did some testing to ensure that the tests depending on kprobe_multi
now run correctly on arm64, it is fair to stress that all the hard
work has actually been done by M. Hiramatsu ([0])
[0] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/173518987627.391279.3307342580035322889.stgit@devnote2/
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/DENYLIST.aarch64 | 9 ---------
1 file changed, 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/DENYLIST.aarch64 b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/DENYLIST.aarch64
index 901349da680fa67896d279d184db78e964d9ae27..6d8feda27ce9de07d77d6e384666082923e3dc76 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/DENYLIST.aarch64
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/DENYLIST.aarch64
@@ -1,12 +1,3 @@
-bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_attach_api # kprobe_multi_link_api_subtest:FAIL:fentry_raw_skel_load unexpected error: -3
-bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_link_api # kprobe_multi_link_api_subtest:FAIL:fentry_raw_skel_load unexpected error: -3
-kprobe_multi_bench_attach # needs CONFIG_FPROBE
-kprobe_multi_test # needs CONFIG_FPROBE
-module_attach # prog 'kprobe_multi': failed to auto-attach: -95
fentry_test/fentry_many_args # fentry_many_args:FAIL:fentry_many_args_attach unexpected error: -524
fexit_test/fexit_many_args # fexit_many_args:FAIL:fexit_many_args_attach unexpected error: -524
tracing_struct/struct_many_args # struct_many_args:FAIL:tracing_struct_many_args__attach unexpected error: -524
-fill_link_info/kprobe_multi_link_info # bpf_program__attach_kprobe_multi_opts unexpected error: -95
-fill_link_info/kretprobe_multi_link_info # bpf_program__attach_kprobe_multi_opts unexpected error: -95
-fill_link_info/kprobe_multi_invalid_ubuff # bpf_program__attach_kprobe_multi_opts unexpected error: -95
-missed/kprobe_recursion # missed_kprobe_recursion__attach unexpected error: -95 (errno 95)
---
base-commit: d3417ac824b98e8773bc04b93e09c4b93c2c6cad
change-id: 20250219-enable_kprobe_multi_tests-c8d53336e5cd
Best regards,
--
Alexis Lothoré, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
next reply other threads:[~2025-02-19 19:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-19 19:41 Alexis Lothoré (eBPF Foundation) [this message]
2025-02-19 23:10 ` [PATCH] selftests/bpf: DENYLIST.aarch64: enable kprobe_multi tests for ARM64 patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250219-enable_kprobe_multi_tests-v1-1-faeec99240c8@bootlin.com \
--to=alexis.lothore@bootlin.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bastien.curutchet@bootlin.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=ebpf@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=mykolal@fb.com \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox