From: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Emil Tsalapatis <emil@etsalapatis.com>,
Barret Rhoden <brho@google.com>, Josh Don <joshdon@google.com>,
Dohyun Kim <dohyunkim@google.com>,
kkd@meta.com, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v3 2/3] selftests/bpf: Introduce arena spin lock
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2025 17:18:48 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250305011849.1168917-3-memxor@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250305011849.1168917-1-memxor@gmail.com>
Implement queued spin lock algorithm as BPF program for lock words
living in BPF arena.
The algorithm is copied from kernel/locking/qspinlock.c and adapted for
BPF use.
We first implement abstract helpers for portable atomics and
acquire/release load instructions, by relying on X86_64 presence to
elide expensive barriers and rely on implementation details of the JIT,
and fall back to slow but correct implementations elsewhere. When
support for acquire/release load/stores lands, we can improve this
state.
Then, the qspinlock algorithm is adapted to remove dependence on
multi-word atomics due to lack of support in BPF ISA. For instance,
xchg_tail cannot use 16-bit xchg, and needs to be a implemented as a
32-bit try_cmpxchg loop.
Loops which are seemingly infinite from verifier PoV are annotated with
cond_break_label macro to return an error. Only 1024 NR_CPUs are
supported.
We need to allocate 1025 qnodes, one more than NR_CPUs, since if libbpf
maps the qnode global variable starting at the first page of the arena,
and the lower 32-bits are zeroed for the base address, the first node
for CPU 0 will become indistinguishable from a NULL pointer, leading to
spurious timeouts and failures.
Note that the slow path is a global function, hence the verifier doesn't
know the return value's precision. The recommended way of usage is to
always test against zero for success, and not ret < 0 for error, as the
verifier would assume ret > 0 has not been accounted for.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
---
.../selftests/bpf/bpf_arena_spin_lock.h | 505 ++++++++++++++++++
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_atomic.h | 132 +++++
2 files changed, 637 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_arena_spin_lock.h
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_atomic.h
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_arena_spin_lock.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_arena_spin_lock.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..cc7de78e0373
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_arena_spin_lock.h
@@ -0,0 +1,505 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/* Copyright (c) 2025 Meta Platforms, Inc. and affiliates. */
+#ifndef BPF_ARENA_SPIN_LOCK_H
+#define BPF_ARENA_SPIN_LOCK_H
+
+#include <vmlinux.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+#include "bpf_atomic.h"
+
+#define arch_mcs_spin_lock_contended_label(l, label) smp_cond_load_acquire_label(l, VAL, label)
+#define arch_mcs_spin_unlock_contended(l) smp_store_release((l), 1)
+
+#if defined(ENABLE_ATOMICS_TESTS) && defined(__BPF_FEATURE_ADDR_SPACE_CAST)
+
+#define EBUSY 16
+#define EOPNOTSUPP 95
+#define ETIMEDOUT 110
+
+#ifndef __arena
+#define __arena __attribute__((address_space(1)))
+#endif
+
+extern unsigned long CONFIG_NR_CPUS __kconfig;
+
+#define arena_spinlock_t struct qspinlock
+/* FIXME: Using typedef causes CO-RE relocation error */
+/* typedef struct qspinlock arena_spinlock_t; */
+
+struct arena_mcs_spinlock {
+ struct arena_mcs_spinlock __arena *next;
+ int locked;
+ int count;
+};
+
+struct arena_qnode {
+ struct arena_mcs_spinlock mcs;
+};
+
+#define _Q_MAX_NODES 4
+#define _Q_PENDING_LOOPS 1
+
+/*
+ * Bitfields in the atomic value:
+ *
+ * 0- 7: locked byte
+ * 8: pending
+ * 9-15: not used
+ * 16-17: tail index
+ * 18-31: tail cpu (+1)
+ */
+#define _Q_MAX_CPUS 1024
+
+#define _Q_SET_MASK(type) (((1U << _Q_ ## type ## _BITS) - 1)\
+ << _Q_ ## type ## _OFFSET)
+#define _Q_LOCKED_OFFSET 0
+#define _Q_LOCKED_BITS 8
+#define _Q_LOCKED_MASK _Q_SET_MASK(LOCKED)
+
+#define _Q_PENDING_OFFSET (_Q_LOCKED_OFFSET + _Q_LOCKED_BITS)
+#define _Q_PENDING_BITS 8
+#define _Q_PENDING_MASK _Q_SET_MASK(PENDING)
+
+#define _Q_TAIL_IDX_OFFSET (_Q_PENDING_OFFSET + _Q_PENDING_BITS)
+#define _Q_TAIL_IDX_BITS 2
+#define _Q_TAIL_IDX_MASK _Q_SET_MASK(TAIL_IDX)
+
+#define _Q_TAIL_CPU_OFFSET (_Q_TAIL_IDX_OFFSET + _Q_TAIL_IDX_BITS)
+#define _Q_TAIL_CPU_BITS (32 - _Q_TAIL_CPU_OFFSET)
+#define _Q_TAIL_CPU_MASK _Q_SET_MASK(TAIL_CPU)
+
+#define _Q_TAIL_OFFSET _Q_TAIL_IDX_OFFSET
+#define _Q_TAIL_MASK (_Q_TAIL_IDX_MASK | _Q_TAIL_CPU_MASK)
+
+#define _Q_LOCKED_VAL (1U << _Q_LOCKED_OFFSET)
+#define _Q_PENDING_VAL (1U << _Q_PENDING_OFFSET)
+
+#define likely(x) __builtin_expect(!!(x), 1)
+#define unlikely(x) __builtin_expect(!!(x), 0)
+
+/*
+ * We always index with + 1, in case we unfortunately place the qnodes at
+ * pg_offset=0 and then CPU 0's qnodes is indistinguishable from NULL if lower
+ * 32-bits of the node pointer are 0.
+ */
+struct arena_qnode __arena qnodes[_Q_MAX_CPUS + 1][_Q_MAX_NODES];
+
+static inline u32 encode_tail(int cpu, int idx)
+{
+ u32 tail;
+
+ tail = (cpu + 1) << _Q_TAIL_CPU_OFFSET;
+ tail |= idx << _Q_TAIL_IDX_OFFSET; /* assume < 4 */
+
+ return tail;
+}
+
+static inline struct arena_mcs_spinlock __arena *decode_tail(u32 tail)
+{
+ u32 cpu = (tail >> _Q_TAIL_CPU_OFFSET) - 1;
+ u32 idx = (tail & _Q_TAIL_IDX_MASK) >> _Q_TAIL_IDX_OFFSET;
+
+ /* See comments over definition of qnodes for the + 1. */
+ if (likely(idx < _Q_MAX_NODES && cpu < _Q_MAX_CPUS))
+ return &qnodes[cpu + 1][idx].mcs;
+ bpf_printk("RUNTIME ERROR: %s idx=%u and cpu=%u are out-of-bounds!!!", __func__, idx, cpu);
+ return NULL;
+}
+
+static inline
+struct arena_mcs_spinlock __arena *grab_mcs_node(struct arena_mcs_spinlock __arena *base, int idx)
+{
+ return &((struct arena_qnode __arena *)base + idx)->mcs;
+}
+
+#define _Q_LOCKED_PENDING_MASK (_Q_LOCKED_MASK | _Q_PENDING_MASK)
+
+/**
+ * xchg_tail - Put in the new queue tail code word & retrieve previous one
+ * @lock : Pointer to queued spinlock structure
+ * @tail : The new queue tail code word
+ * Return: The previous queue tail code word
+ *
+ * xchg(lock, tail)
+ *
+ * p,*,* -> n,*,* ; prev = xchg(lock, node)
+ */
+static __always_inline u32 xchg_tail(arena_spinlock_t __arena *lock, u32 tail)
+{
+ u32 old, new;
+
+ old = atomic_read(&lock->val);
+ do {
+ new = (old & _Q_LOCKED_PENDING_MASK) | tail;
+ /*
+ * We can use relaxed semantics since the caller ensures that
+ * the MCS node is properly initialized before updating the
+ * tail.
+ */
+ /* These loops are not expected to stall, but we still need to
+ * prove to the verifier they will terminate eventually.
+ */
+ cond_break_label(out);
+ } while (!atomic_try_cmpxchg_relaxed(&lock->val, &old, new));
+
+ return old;
+out:
+ bpf_printk("RUNTIME ERROR: %s unexpected cond_break exit!!!", __func__);
+ return old;
+}
+
+/**
+ * clear_pending - clear the pending bit.
+ * @lock: Pointer to queued spinlock structure
+ *
+ * *,1,* -> *,0,*
+ */
+static __always_inline void clear_pending(arena_spinlock_t __arena *lock)
+{
+ WRITE_ONCE(lock->pending, 0);
+}
+
+/**
+ * clear_pending_set_locked - take ownership and clear the pending bit.
+ * @lock: Pointer to queued spinlock structure
+ *
+ * *,1,0 -> *,0,1
+ *
+ * Lock stealing is not allowed if this function is used.
+ */
+static __always_inline void clear_pending_set_locked(arena_spinlock_t __arena *lock)
+{
+ WRITE_ONCE(lock->locked_pending, _Q_LOCKED_VAL);
+}
+
+/**
+ * set_locked - Set the lock bit and own the lock
+ * @lock: Pointer to queued spinlock structure
+ *
+ * *,*,0 -> *,0,1
+ */
+static __always_inline void set_locked(arena_spinlock_t __arena *lock)
+{
+ WRITE_ONCE(lock->locked, _Q_LOCKED_VAL);
+}
+
+static __always_inline
+u32 arena_fetch_set_pending_acquire(arena_spinlock_t __arena *lock)
+{
+ u32 old, new;
+
+ old = atomic_read(&lock->val);
+ do {
+ new = old | _Q_PENDING_VAL;
+ /*
+ * These loops are not expected to stall, but we still need to
+ * prove to the verifier they will terminate eventually.
+ */
+ cond_break_label(out);
+ } while (!atomic_try_cmpxchg_acquire(&lock->val, &old, new));
+
+ return old;
+out:
+ bpf_printk("RUNTIME ERROR: %s unexpected cond_break exit!!!", __func__);
+ return old;
+}
+
+/**
+ * arena_spin_trylock - try to acquire the queued spinlock
+ * @lock : Pointer to queued spinlock structure
+ * Return: 1 if lock acquired, 0 if failed
+ */
+static __always_inline int arena_spin_trylock(arena_spinlock_t __arena *lock)
+{
+ int val = atomic_read(&lock->val);
+
+ if (unlikely(val))
+ return 0;
+
+ return likely(atomic_try_cmpxchg_acquire(&lock->val, &val, _Q_LOCKED_VAL));
+}
+
+__noinline
+int arena_spin_lock_slowpath(arena_spinlock_t __arena __arg_arena *lock, u32 val)
+{
+ struct arena_mcs_spinlock __arena *prev, *next, *node0, *node;
+ int ret = -ETIMEDOUT;
+ u32 old, tail;
+ int idx;
+
+ /*
+ * Wait for in-progress pending->locked hand-overs with a bounded
+ * number of spins so that we guarantee forward progress.
+ *
+ * 0,1,0 -> 0,0,1
+ */
+ if (val == _Q_PENDING_VAL) {
+ int cnt = _Q_PENDING_LOOPS;
+ val = atomic_cond_read_relaxed_label(&lock->val,
+ (VAL != _Q_PENDING_VAL) || !cnt--,
+ release_err);
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * If we observe any contention; queue.
+ */
+ if (val & ~_Q_LOCKED_MASK)
+ goto queue;
+
+ /*
+ * trylock || pending
+ *
+ * 0,0,* -> 0,1,* -> 0,0,1 pending, trylock
+ */
+ val = arena_fetch_set_pending_acquire(lock);
+
+ /*
+ * If we observe contention, there is a concurrent locker.
+ *
+ * Undo and queue; our setting of PENDING might have made the
+ * n,0,0 -> 0,0,0 transition fail and it will now be waiting
+ * on @next to become !NULL.
+ */
+ if (unlikely(val & ~_Q_LOCKED_MASK)) {
+
+ /* Undo PENDING if we set it. */
+ if (!(val & _Q_PENDING_MASK))
+ clear_pending(lock);
+
+ goto queue;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * We're pending, wait for the owner to go away.
+ *
+ * 0,1,1 -> *,1,0
+ *
+ * this wait loop must be a load-acquire such that we match the
+ * store-release that clears the locked bit and create lock
+ * sequentiality; this is because not all
+ * clear_pending_set_locked() implementations imply full
+ * barriers.
+ */
+ if (val & _Q_LOCKED_MASK)
+ smp_cond_load_acquire_label(&lock->locked, !VAL, release_err);
+
+ /*
+ * take ownership and clear the pending bit.
+ *
+ * 0,1,0 -> 0,0,1
+ */
+ clear_pending_set_locked(lock);
+ return 0;
+
+ /*
+ * End of pending bit optimistic spinning and beginning of MCS
+ * queuing.
+ */
+queue:
+ /* See comments over definition of qnodes for the + 1. */
+ node0 = &(qnodes[bpf_get_smp_processor_id() + 1])[0].mcs;
+ idx = node0->count++;
+ tail = encode_tail(bpf_get_smp_processor_id(), idx);
+
+ /*
+ * 4 nodes are allocated based on the assumption that there will not be
+ * nested NMIs taking spinlocks. That may not be true in some
+ * architectures even though the chance of needing more than 4 nodes
+ * will still be extremely unlikely. When that happens, we simply return
+ * an error. Original qspinlock has a trylock fallback in this case.
+ */
+ if (unlikely(idx >= _Q_MAX_NODES)) {
+ ret = -EBUSY;
+ goto release_node_err;
+ }
+
+ node = grab_mcs_node(node0, idx);
+
+ /*
+ * Ensure that we increment the head node->count before initialising
+ * the actual node. If the compiler is kind enough to reorder these
+ * stores, then an IRQ could overwrite our assignments.
+ */
+ barrier();
+
+ node->locked = 0;
+ node->next = NULL;
+
+ /*
+ * We touched a (possibly) cold cacheline in the per-cpu queue node;
+ * attempt the trylock once more in the hope someone let go while we
+ * weren't watching.
+ */
+ if (arena_spin_trylock(lock))
+ goto release;
+
+ /*
+ * Ensure that the initialisation of @node is complete before we
+ * publish the updated tail via xchg_tail() and potentially link
+ * @node into the waitqueue via WRITE_ONCE(prev->next, node) below.
+ */
+ smp_wmb();
+
+ /*
+ * Publish the updated tail.
+ * We have already touched the queueing cacheline; don't bother with
+ * pending stuff.
+ *
+ * p,*,* -> n,*,*
+ */
+ old = xchg_tail(lock, tail);
+ next = NULL;
+
+ /*
+ * if there was a previous node; link it and wait until reaching the
+ * head of the waitqueue.
+ */
+ if (old & _Q_TAIL_MASK) {
+ prev = decode_tail(old);
+
+ /* Link @node into the waitqueue. */
+ WRITE_ONCE(prev->next, node);
+
+ arch_mcs_spin_lock_contended_label(&node->locked, release_node_err);
+
+ /*
+ * While waiting for the MCS lock, the next pointer may have
+ * been set by another lock waiter. We cannot prefetch here
+ * due to lack of equivalent instruction in BPF ISA.
+ */
+ next = READ_ONCE(node->next);
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * we're at the head of the waitqueue, wait for the owner & pending to
+ * go away.
+ *
+ * *,x,y -> *,0,0
+ *
+ * this wait loop must use a load-acquire such that we match the
+ * store-release that clears the locked bit and create lock
+ * sequentiality; this is because the set_locked() function below
+ * does not imply a full barrier.
+ */
+ val = atomic_cond_read_acquire_label(&lock->val, !(VAL & _Q_LOCKED_PENDING_MASK),
+ release_node_err);
+
+ /*
+ * claim the lock:
+ *
+ * n,0,0 -> 0,0,1 : lock, uncontended
+ * *,*,0 -> *,*,1 : lock, contended
+ *
+ * If the queue head is the only one in the queue (lock value == tail)
+ * and nobody is pending, clear the tail code and grab the lock.
+ * Otherwise, we only need to grab the lock.
+ */
+
+ /*
+ * In the PV case we might already have _Q_LOCKED_VAL set, because
+ * of lock stealing; therefore we must also allow:
+ *
+ * n,0,1 -> 0,0,1
+ *
+ * Note: at this point: (val & _Q_PENDING_MASK) == 0, because of the
+ * above wait condition, therefore any concurrent setting of
+ * PENDING will make the uncontended transition fail.
+ */
+ if ((val & _Q_TAIL_MASK) == tail) {
+ if (atomic_try_cmpxchg_relaxed(&lock->val, &val, _Q_LOCKED_VAL))
+ goto release; /* No contention */
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Either somebody is queued behind us or _Q_PENDING_VAL got set
+ * which will then detect the remaining tail and queue behind us
+ * ensuring we'll see a @next.
+ */
+ set_locked(lock);
+
+ /*
+ * contended path; wait for next if not observed yet, release.
+ */
+ if (!next)
+ next = smp_cond_load_relaxed_label(&node->next, (VAL), release_node_err);
+
+ arch_mcs_spin_unlock_contended(&next->locked);
+
+release:;
+ /*
+ * release the node
+ *
+ * Doing a normal dec vs this_cpu_dec is fine. An upper context always
+ * decrements count it incremented before returning, thus we're fine.
+ * For contexts interrupting us, they either observe our dec or not.
+ * Just ensure the compiler doesn't reorder this statement, as a
+ * this_cpu_dec implicitly implied that.
+ */
+ barrier();
+ node0->count--;
+ return 0;
+release_node_err:
+ barrier();
+ node0->count--;
+ goto release_err;
+release_err:
+ return ret;
+}
+
+/**
+ * arena_spin_lock - acquire a queued spinlock
+ * @lock: Pointer to queued spinlock structure
+ *
+ * The return value _must_ be tested against zero for success.
+ * On error, returned value will be negative.
+ */
+static __always_inline int arena_spin_lock(arena_spinlock_t __arena *lock)
+{
+ int val = 0;
+
+ if (CONFIG_NR_CPUS > 1024)
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
+ bpf_preempt_disable();
+ if (likely(atomic_try_cmpxchg_acquire(&lock->val, &val, _Q_LOCKED_VAL)))
+ return 0;
+
+ val = arena_spin_lock_slowpath(lock, val);
+ /* FIXME: bpf_assert_range(-MAX_ERRNO, 0) once we have it working for all cases. */
+ if (val)
+ bpf_preempt_enable();
+ return val;
+}
+
+/**
+ * arena_spin_unlock - release a queued spinlock
+ * @lock : Pointer to queued spinlock structure
+ */
+static __always_inline void arena_spin_unlock(arena_spinlock_t __arena *lock)
+{
+ /*
+ * unlock() needs release semantics:
+ */
+ smp_store_release(&lock->locked, 0);
+ bpf_preempt_enable();
+}
+
+#define arena_spin_lock_irqsave(lock, flags) \
+ ({ \
+ int __ret; \
+ bpf_local_irq_save(&(flags)); \
+ __ret = arena_spin_lock((lock)); \
+ if (__ret) \
+ bpf_local_irq_restore(&(flags)); \
+ (__ret); \
+ })
+
+#define arena_spin_unlock_irqrestore(lock, flags) \
+ ({ \
+ arena_spin_unlock((lock)); \
+ bpf_local_irq_restore(&(flags)); \
+ })
+
+#endif
+
+#endif /* BPF_ARENA_SPIN_LOCK_H */
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_atomic.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_atomic.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..06defb9e050d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_atomic.h
@@ -0,0 +1,132 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/* Copyright (c) 2025 Meta Platforms, Inc. and affiliates. */
+#ifndef BPF_ATOMIC_H
+#define BPF_ATOMIC_H
+
+#include <vmlinux.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+#include "bpf_experimental.h"
+
+extern bool CONFIG_X86_64 __kconfig __weak;
+
+#define __scalar_type_to_expr_cases(type) \
+ unsigned type : (unsigned type)0, signed type : (signed type)0
+/*
+ * This is lifted from __unqual_scalar_typeof in the kernel (which is used to
+ * lose const qualifier etc.), but adapted to also cover pointers. It is
+ * necessary because we ascertain type to create local variables in macros
+ * below, but for pointers with __arena tag, we'll ascertain the underlying type
+ * with the tag, causing a compilation error (as local variables that are not
+ * pointers may not have __arena tag). This trick allows losing the qualifier.
+ */
+#define __unqual_typeof(x) \
+ typeof(_Generic((x), \
+ char: (char)0, \
+ __scalar_type_to_expr_cases(char), \
+ __scalar_type_to_expr_cases(short), \
+ __scalar_type_to_expr_cases(int), \
+ __scalar_type_to_expr_cases(long), \
+ __scalar_type_to_expr_cases(long long), \
+ default: (void *)0))
+
+/* No-op for BPF */
+#define cpu_relax() ({})
+
+#define READ_ONCE(x) (*(volatile typeof(x) *)&(x))
+
+#define WRITE_ONCE(x, val) ((*(volatile typeof(x) *)&(x)) = (val))
+
+#define cmpxchg(p, old, new) __sync_val_compare_and_swap((p), old, new)
+
+#define try_cmpxchg(p, pold, new) \
+ ({ \
+ __unqual_typeof(*(pold)) __o = *(pold); \
+ __unqual_typeof(*(p)) __r = cmpxchg(p, __o, new); \
+ if (__r != __o) \
+ *(pold) = __r; \
+ __r == __o; \
+ })
+
+#define try_cmpxchg_relaxed(p, pold, new) try_cmpxchg(p, pold, new)
+
+#define try_cmpxchg_acquire(p, pold, new) try_cmpxchg(p, pold, new)
+
+#define smp_mb() \
+ ({ \
+ unsigned long __val; \
+ __sync_fetch_and_add(&__val, 0); \
+ })
+
+#define smp_rmb() \
+ ({ \
+ if (!CONFIG_X86_64) \
+ smp_mb(); \
+ else \
+ barrier(); \
+ })
+
+#define smp_wmb() \
+ ({ \
+ if (!CONFIG_X86_64) \
+ smp_mb(); \
+ else \
+ barrier(); \
+ })
+
+/* Control dependency provides LOAD->STORE, provide LOAD->LOAD */
+#define smp_acquire__after_ctrl_dep() ({ smp_rmb(); })
+
+#define smp_load_acquire(p) \
+ ({ \
+ __unqual_typeof(*(p)) __v = READ_ONCE(*(p)); \
+ if (!CONFIG_X86_64) \
+ smp_mb(); \
+ barrier(); \
+ __v; \
+ })
+
+#define smp_store_release(p, val) \
+ ({ \
+ if (!CONFIG_X86_64) \
+ smp_mb(); \
+ barrier(); \
+ WRITE_ONCE(*(p), val); \
+ })
+
+#define smp_cond_load_relaxed_label(p, cond_expr, label) \
+ ({ \
+ typeof(p) __ptr = (p); \
+ __unqual_typeof(*(p)) VAL; \
+ for (;;) { \
+ VAL = (__unqual_typeof(*(p)))READ_ONCE(*__ptr); \
+ if (cond_expr) \
+ break; \
+ cond_break_label(label); \
+ cpu_relax(); \
+ } \
+ (typeof(*(p)))VAL; \
+ })
+
+#define smp_cond_load_acquire_label(p, cond_expr, label) \
+ ({ \
+ __unqual_typeof(*p) __val = \
+ smp_cond_load_relaxed_label(p, cond_expr, label); \
+ smp_acquire__after_ctrl_dep(); \
+ (typeof(*(p)))__val; \
+ })
+
+#define atomic_read(p) READ_ONCE((p)->counter)
+
+#define atomic_cond_read_relaxed_label(p, cond_expr, label) \
+ smp_cond_load_relaxed_label(&(p)->counter, cond_expr, label)
+
+#define atomic_cond_read_acquire_label(p, cond_expr, label) \
+ smp_cond_load_acquire_label(&(p)->counter, cond_expr, label)
+
+#define atomic_try_cmpxchg_relaxed(p, pold, new) \
+ try_cmpxchg_relaxed(&(p)->counter, pold, new)
+
+#define atomic_try_cmpxchg_acquire(p, pold, new) \
+ try_cmpxchg_acquire(&(p)->counter, pold, new)
+
+#endif /* BPF_ATOMIC_H */
--
2.47.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-05 1:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-05 1:18 [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/3] Arena Spin Lock Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-03-05 1:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 1/3] selftests/bpf: Introduce cond_break_label Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-03-05 1:18 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi [this message]
2025-03-05 2:27 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 2/3] selftests/bpf: Introduce arena spin lock Alexei Starovoitov
2025-03-05 3:14 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-03-05 3:40 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-03-05 4:28 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-03-05 1:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 3/3] selftests/bpf: Add tests for " Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-03-05 2:03 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-03-05 2:14 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-03-05 2:24 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250305011849.1168917-3-memxor@gmail.com \
--to=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=brho@google.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=dohyunkim@google.com \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=emil@etsalapatis.com \
--cc=joshdon@google.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=kkd@meta.com \
--cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox