[PATCH bpf-next v1] bpf: correct use/def for may_goto instruction

[Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>]

may_goto instruction does not use any registers,
but in compute_insn_live_regs() it was treated as a regular
conditional jump of kind BPF_K with r0 as source register.
Thus unnecessarily marking r0 as used.

Fixes: 7dad03653567 ("bpf: simple DFA-based live registers analysis")
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
---
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c                                      | 1 +
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/compute_live_registers.c | 6 +++---
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 4edb2db0f889..3303a3605ee8 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -23567,6 +23567,7 @@ static void compute_insn_live_regs(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
 	case BPF_JMP32:
 		switch (code) {
 		case BPF_JA:
+		case BPF_JCOND:
 			def = 0;
 			use = 0;
 			break;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/compute_live_registers.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/compute_live_registers.c
index 14df92949e81..f3d79aecbf93 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/compute_live_registers.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/compute_live_registers.c
@@ -294,9 +294,9 @@ __naked void gotol(void)
 
 SEC("socket")
 __log_level(2)
-__msg("0: 0......... (b7) r1 = 1")
-__msg("1: 01........ (e5) may_goto pc+1")
-__msg("2: 0......... (05) goto pc-3")
+__msg("0: .......... (b7) r1 = 1")
+__msg("1: .1........ (e5) may_goto pc+1")
+__msg("2: .......... (05) goto pc-3")
 __msg("3: .1........ (bf) r0 = r1")
 __msg("4: 0......... (95) exit")
 __naked void may_goto(void)
-- 
2.48.1