BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Viktor Malik <vmalik@redhat.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
	Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@fb.com>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
	Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
	Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
	Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>, Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
	Nick Desaulniers <nick.desaulniers+lkml@gmail.com>,
	Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com>,
	Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com>,
	Viktor Malik <vmalik@redhat.com>, Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v2] selftests/bpf: Fix string read in strncmp benchmark
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2025 13:28:52 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250313122852.1365202-1-vmalik@redhat.com> (raw)

The strncmp benchmark uses the bpf_strncmp helper and a hand-written
loop to compare two strings. The values of the strings are filled from
userspace. One of the strings is non-const (in .bss) while the other is
const (in .rodata) since that is the requirement of bpf_strncmp.

The problem is that in the hand-written loop, Clang optimizes the reads
from the const string to always return 0 which breaks the benchmark.

Use barrier_var to prevent the optimization.

The effect can be seen on the strncmp-no-helper variant.

Before this change:

    # ./bench strncmp-no-helper
    Setting up benchmark 'strncmp-no-helper'...
    Benchmark 'strncmp-no-helper' started.
    Iter   0 (112.309us): hits    0.000M/s (  0.000M/prod), drops    0.000M/s, total operations    0.000M/s
    Iter   1 (-23.238us): hits    0.000M/s (  0.000M/prod), drops    0.000M/s, total operations    0.000M/s
    Iter   2 ( 58.994us): hits    0.000M/s (  0.000M/prod), drops    0.000M/s, total operations    0.000M/s
    Iter   3 (-30.466us): hits    0.000M/s (  0.000M/prod), drops    0.000M/s, total operations    0.000M/s
    Iter   4 ( 29.996us): hits    0.000M/s (  0.000M/prod), drops    0.000M/s, total operations    0.000M/s
    Iter   5 ( 16.949us): hits    0.000M/s (  0.000M/prod), drops    0.000M/s, total operations    0.000M/s
    Iter   6 (-60.035us): hits    0.000M/s (  0.000M/prod), drops    0.000M/s, total operations    0.000M/s
    Summary: hits    0.000 ± 0.000M/s (  0.000M/prod), drops    0.000 ± 0.000M/s, total operations    0.000 ± 0.000M/s

After this change:

    # ./bench strncmp-no-helper
    Setting up benchmark 'strncmp-no-helper'...
    Benchmark 'strncmp-no-helper' started.
    Iter   0 ( 77.711us): hits    5.534M/s (  5.534M/prod), drops    0.000M/s, total operations    5.534M/s
    Iter   1 ( 11.215us): hits    6.006M/s (  6.006M/prod), drops    0.000M/s, total operations    6.006M/s
    Iter   2 (-14.253us): hits    5.931M/s (  5.931M/prod), drops    0.000M/s, total operations    5.931M/s
    Iter   3 ( 59.087us): hits    6.005M/s (  6.005M/prod), drops    0.000M/s, total operations    6.005M/s
    Iter   4 (-21.379us): hits    6.010M/s (  6.010M/prod), drops    0.000M/s, total operations    6.010M/s
    Iter   5 (-20.310us): hits    5.861M/s (  5.861M/prod), drops    0.000M/s, total operations    5.861M/s
    Iter   6 ( 53.937us): hits    6.004M/s (  6.004M/prod), drops    0.000M/s, total operations    6.004M/s
    Summary: hits    5.969 ± 0.061M/s (  5.969M/prod), drops    0.000 ± 0.000M/s, total operations    5.969 ± 0.061M/s

Suggested-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Fixes: 9c42652f8be3 ("selftests/bpf: Add benchmark for bpf_strncmp() helper")
Signed-off-by: Viktor Malik <vmalik@redhat.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/strncmp_bench.c | 5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/strncmp_bench.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/strncmp_bench.c
index 18373a7df76e..f47bf88f8d2a 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/strncmp_bench.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/strncmp_bench.c
@@ -35,7 +35,10 @@ static __always_inline int local_strncmp(const char *s1, unsigned int sz,
 SEC("tp/syscalls/sys_enter_getpgid")
 int strncmp_no_helper(void *ctx)
 {
-	if (local_strncmp(str, cmp_str_len + 1, target) < 0)
+	const char *target_str = target;
+
+	barrier_var(target_str);
+	if (local_strncmp(str, cmp_str_len + 1, target_str) < 0)
 		__sync_add_and_fetch(&hits, 1);
 	return 0;
 }
-- 
2.48.1


             reply	other threads:[~2025-03-13 12:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-13 12:28 Viktor Malik [this message]
2025-03-13 12:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2] selftests/bpf: Fix string read in strncmp benchmark Hou Tao
2025-03-13 21:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250313122852.1365202-1-vmalik@redhat.com \
    --to=vmalik@redhat.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=houtao1@huawei.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=justinstitt@google.com \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=morbo@google.com \
    --cc=mykolal@fb.com \
    --cc=nathan@kernel.org \
    --cc=nick.desaulniers+lkml@gmail.com \
    --cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox