From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Cc: "Kees Cook" <keescook@chromium.org>,
"Eyal Birger" <eyal.birger@gmail.com>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
"Song Liu" <songliubraving@fb.com>, "Yonghong Song" <yhs@fb.com>,
"John Fastabend" <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
"Hao Luo" <haoluo@google.com>,
"Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
"Masami Hiramatsu" <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
"Alan Maguire" <alan.maguire@oracle.com>,
"David Laight" <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>,
"Thomas Weißschuh" <thomas@t-8ch.de>
Subject: [PATCH RFCv3 23/23] selftests/seccomp: validate uprobe syscall passes through seccomp
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2025 12:41:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250320114200.14377-24-jolsa@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250320114200.14377-1-jolsa@kernel.org>
Adding uprobe checks into the current uretprobe tests.
All the related tests are now executed with attached uprobe
or uretprobe or without any probe.
Renaming the test fixture to uprobe, because it seems better.
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Eyal Birger <eyal.birger@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
---
tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c | 107 ++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 86 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c
index 14ba51b52095..794787786968 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c
@@ -73,6 +73,14 @@
#define noinline __attribute__((noinline))
#endif
+#ifndef __nocf_check
+#define __nocf_check __attribute__((nocf_check))
+#endif
+
+#ifndef __naked
+#define __naked __attribute__((__naked__))
+#endif
+
#ifndef PR_SET_NO_NEW_PRIVS
#define PR_SET_NO_NEW_PRIVS 38
#define PR_GET_NO_NEW_PRIVS 39
@@ -4893,7 +4901,36 @@ TEST(tsync_vs_dead_thread_leader)
EXPECT_EQ(0, status);
}
-noinline int probed(void)
+#ifdef __x86_64__
+
+/*
+ * We need naked probed_uprobe function. Using __nocf_check
+ * check to skip possible endbr64 instruction and ignoring
+ * -Wattributes, otherwise the compilation might fail.
+ */
+#pragma GCC diagnostic push
+#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wattributes"
+
+__naked __nocf_check noinline int probed_uprobe(void)
+{
+ /*
+ * Optimized uprobe is possible only on top of nop5 instruction.
+ */
+ asm volatile (" \n"
+ ".byte 0x0f, 0x1f, 0x44, 0x00, 0x00 \n"
+ "ret \n"
+ );
+}
+#pragma GCC diagnostic pop
+
+#else
+noinline int probed_uprobe(void)
+{
+ return 1;
+}
+#endif
+
+noinline int probed_uretprobe(void)
{
return 1;
}
@@ -4946,35 +4983,46 @@ static ssize_t get_uprobe_offset(const void *addr)
return found ? (uintptr_t)addr - start + base : -1;
}
-FIXTURE(URETPROBE) {
+FIXTURE(UPROBE) {
int fd;
};
-FIXTURE_VARIANT(URETPROBE) {
+FIXTURE_VARIANT(UPROBE) {
/*
- * All of the URETPROBE behaviors can be tested with either
- * uretprobe attached or not
+ * All of the U(RET)PROBE behaviors can be tested with either
+ * u(ret)probe attached or not
*/
bool attach;
+ /*
+ * Test both uprobe and uretprobe.
+ */
+ bool uretprobe;
};
-FIXTURE_VARIANT_ADD(URETPROBE, attached) {
+FIXTURE_VARIANT_ADD(UPROBE, not_attached) {
+ .attach = false,
+ .uretprobe = false,
+};
+
+FIXTURE_VARIANT_ADD(UPROBE, uprobe_attached) {
.attach = true,
+ .uretprobe = false,
};
-FIXTURE_VARIANT_ADD(URETPROBE, not_attached) {
- .attach = false,
+FIXTURE_VARIANT_ADD(UPROBE, uretprobe_attached) {
+ .attach = true,
+ .uretprobe = true,
};
-FIXTURE_SETUP(URETPROBE)
+FIXTURE_SETUP(UPROBE)
{
const size_t attr_sz = sizeof(struct perf_event_attr);
struct perf_event_attr attr;
ssize_t offset;
int type, bit;
-#ifndef __NR_uretprobe
- SKIP(return, "__NR_uretprobe syscall not defined");
+#if !defined(__NR_uprobe) || !defined(__NR_uretprobe)
+ SKIP(return, "__NR_uprobe ot __NR_uretprobe syscalls not defined");
#endif
if (!variant->attach)
@@ -4984,12 +5032,17 @@ FIXTURE_SETUP(URETPROBE)
type = determine_uprobe_perf_type();
ASSERT_GE(type, 0);
- bit = determine_uprobe_retprobe_bit();
- ASSERT_GE(bit, 0);
- offset = get_uprobe_offset(probed);
+
+ if (variant->uretprobe) {
+ bit = determine_uprobe_retprobe_bit();
+ ASSERT_GE(bit, 0);
+ }
+
+ offset = get_uprobe_offset(variant->uretprobe ? probed_uretprobe : probed_uprobe);
ASSERT_GE(offset, 0);
- attr.config |= 1 << bit;
+ if (variant->uretprobe)
+ attr.config |= 1 << bit;
attr.size = attr_sz;
attr.type = type;
attr.config1 = ptr_to_u64("/proc/self/exe");
@@ -5000,7 +5053,7 @@ FIXTURE_SETUP(URETPROBE)
PERF_FLAG_FD_CLOEXEC);
}
-FIXTURE_TEARDOWN(URETPROBE)
+FIXTURE_TEARDOWN(UPROBE)
{
/* we could call close(self->fd), but we'd need extra filter for
* that and since we are calling _exit right away..
@@ -5014,11 +5067,17 @@ static int run_probed_with_filter(struct sock_fprog *prog)
return -1;
}
- probed();
+ /*
+ * Uprobe is optimized after first hit, so let's hit twice.
+ */
+ probed_uprobe();
+ probed_uprobe();
+
+ probed_uretprobe();
return 0;
}
-TEST_F(URETPROBE, uretprobe_default_allow)
+TEST_F(UPROBE, uprobe_default_allow)
{
struct sock_filter filter[] = {
BPF_STMT(BPF_RET|BPF_K, SECCOMP_RET_ALLOW),
@@ -5031,7 +5090,7 @@ TEST_F(URETPROBE, uretprobe_default_allow)
ASSERT_EQ(0, run_probed_with_filter(&prog));
}
-TEST_F(URETPROBE, uretprobe_default_block)
+TEST_F(UPROBE, uprobe_default_block)
{
struct sock_filter filter[] = {
BPF_STMT(BPF_LD|BPF_W|BPF_ABS,
@@ -5048,11 +5107,14 @@ TEST_F(URETPROBE, uretprobe_default_block)
ASSERT_EQ(0, run_probed_with_filter(&prog));
}
-TEST_F(URETPROBE, uretprobe_block_uretprobe_syscall)
+TEST_F(UPROBE, uprobe_block_syscall)
{
struct sock_filter filter[] = {
BPF_STMT(BPF_LD|BPF_W|BPF_ABS,
offsetof(struct seccomp_data, nr)),
+#ifdef __NR_uprobe
+ BPF_JUMP(BPF_JMP|BPF_JEQ|BPF_K, __NR_uprobe, 1, 2),
+#endif
#ifdef __NR_uretprobe
BPF_JUMP(BPF_JMP|BPF_JEQ|BPF_K, __NR_uretprobe, 0, 1),
#endif
@@ -5067,11 +5129,14 @@ TEST_F(URETPROBE, uretprobe_block_uretprobe_syscall)
ASSERT_EQ(0, run_probed_with_filter(&prog));
}
-TEST_F(URETPROBE, uretprobe_default_block_with_uretprobe_syscall)
+TEST_F(UPROBE, uprobe_default_block_with_syscall)
{
struct sock_filter filter[] = {
BPF_STMT(BPF_LD|BPF_W|BPF_ABS,
offsetof(struct seccomp_data, nr)),
+#ifdef __NR_uprobe
+ BPF_JUMP(BPF_JMP|BPF_JEQ|BPF_K, __NR_uprobe, 3, 0),
+#endif
#ifdef __NR_uretprobe
BPF_JUMP(BPF_JMP|BPF_JEQ|BPF_K, __NR_uretprobe, 2, 0),
#endif
--
2.49.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-20 11:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-20 11:41 [PATCH RFCv3 00/23] uprobes: Add support to optimize usdt probes on x86_64 Jiri Olsa
2025-03-20 11:41 ` [PATCH RFCv3 01/23] uprobes: Rename arch_uretprobe_trampoline function Jiri Olsa
2025-03-20 11:41 ` [PATCH RFCv3 02/23] uprobes: Make copy_from_page global Jiri Olsa
2025-03-20 11:41 ` [PATCH RFCv3 03/23] uprobes: Move ref_ctr_offset update out of uprobe_write_opcode Jiri Olsa
2025-03-20 11:41 ` [PATCH RFCv3 04/23] uprobes: Add uprobe_write function Jiri Olsa
2025-03-20 11:41 ` [PATCH RFCv3 05/23] uprobes: Add nbytes argument to uprobe_write_opcode Jiri Olsa
2025-03-20 11:41 ` [PATCH RFCv3 06/23] uprobes: Add orig argument to uprobe_write and uprobe_write_opcode Jiri Olsa
2025-04-04 20:33 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-04-07 11:13 ` Jiri Olsa
2025-03-20 11:41 ` [PATCH RFCv3 07/23] uprobes: Remove breakpoint in unapply_uprobe under mmap_write_lock Jiri Olsa
2025-03-20 11:41 ` [PATCH RFCv3 08/23] uprobes/x86: Add uprobe syscall to speed up uprobe Jiri Olsa
2025-04-04 20:33 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-04-07 10:58 ` Jiri Olsa
2025-03-20 11:41 ` [PATCH RFCv3 09/23] uprobes/x86: Add mapping for optimized uprobe trampolines Jiri Olsa
2025-03-20 11:41 ` [PATCH RFCv3 10/23] uprobes/x86: Add support to emulate nop5 instruction Jiri Olsa
2025-04-04 20:33 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-04-07 11:07 ` Jiri Olsa
2025-04-08 20:21 ` Jiri Olsa
2025-04-09 18:19 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-04-11 12:18 ` Jiri Olsa
2025-03-20 11:41 ` [PATCH RFCv3 11/23] uprobes/x86: Add support to optimize uprobes Jiri Olsa
2025-03-20 11:41 ` [PATCH RFCv3 12/23] selftests/bpf: Use 5-byte nop for x86 usdt probes Jiri Olsa
2025-03-20 11:41 ` [PATCH RFCv3 13/23] selftests/bpf: Reorg the uprobe_syscall test function Jiri Olsa
2025-03-20 11:41 ` [PATCH RFCv3 14/23] selftests/bpf: Rename uprobe_syscall_executed prog to test_uretprobe_multi Jiri Olsa
2025-03-20 11:41 ` [PATCH RFCv3 15/23] selftests/bpf: Add uprobe/usdt syscall tests Jiri Olsa
2025-03-20 11:41 ` [PATCH RFCv3 16/23] selftests/bpf: Add hit/attach/detach race optimized uprobe test Jiri Olsa
2025-03-20 11:41 ` [PATCH RFCv3 17/23] selftests/bpf: Add uprobe syscall sigill signal test Jiri Olsa
2025-03-20 11:41 ` [PATCH RFCv3 18/23] selftests/bpf: Add optimized usdt variant for basic usdt test Jiri Olsa
2025-03-20 11:41 ` [PATCH RFCv3 19/23] selftests/bpf: Add uprobe_regs_equal test Jiri Olsa
2025-03-20 11:41 ` [PATCH RFCv3 20/23] selftests/bpf: Change test_uretprobe_regs_change for uprobe and uretprobe Jiri Olsa
2025-03-20 11:41 ` [PATCH RFCv3 21/23] selftests/bpf: Add 5-byte nop uprobe trigger bench Jiri Olsa
2025-03-20 11:41 ` [PATCH RFCv3 22/23] seccomp: passthrough uprobe systemcall without filtering Jiri Olsa
2025-03-20 11:41 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2025-03-20 12:23 ` [PATCH RFCv3 00/23] uprobes: Add support to optimize usdt probes on x86_64 Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-20 13:51 ` Jiri Olsa
2025-04-04 20:36 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-04-07 11:17 ` Jiri Olsa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250320114200.14377-24-jolsa@kernel.org \
--to=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=David.Laight@ACULAB.COM \
--cc=alan.maguire@oracle.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=eyal.birger@gmail.com \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
--cc=thomas@t-8ch.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox