From: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
kkd@meta.com, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf v1] bpf: Use architecture provided res_smp_cond_load_acquire
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2025 07:55:12 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250410145512.1876745-1-memxor@gmail.com> (raw)
In v2 of rqspinlock [0], we fixed potential problems with WFE usage in
arm64 to fallback to a version copied from Ankur's series [1]. This
logic was moved into arch-specific headers in v3 [2].
However, we missed using the arch-provided res_smp_cond_load_acquire
in commit ebababcd0372 ("rqspinlock: Hardcode cond_acquire loops for arm64")
due to a rebasing mistake between v2 and v3 of the rqspinlock series.
Fix the typo to fallback to the arm64 definition as we did in v2.
[0]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20250206105435.2159977-18-memxor@gmail.com
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250203214911.898276-1-ankur.a.arora@oracle.com
[2]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20250303152305.3195648-9-memxor@gmail.com
Fixes: ebababcd0372 ("rqspinlock: Hardcode cond_acquire loops for arm64")
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/rqspinlock.h | 2 +-
kernel/bpf/rqspinlock.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/rqspinlock.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/rqspinlock.h
index 5b80785324b6..9ea0a74e5892 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/rqspinlock.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/rqspinlock.h
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@
#endif
-#define res_smp_cond_load_acquire_timewait(v, c) smp_cond_load_acquire_timewait(v, c, 0, 1)
+#define res_smp_cond_load_acquire(v, c) smp_cond_load_acquire_timewait(v, c, 0, 1)
#include <asm-generic/rqspinlock.h>
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/rqspinlock.c b/kernel/bpf/rqspinlock.c
index b896c4a75a5c..338305c8852c 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/rqspinlock.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/rqspinlock.c
@@ -253,7 +253,7 @@ static noinline int check_timeout(rqspinlock_t *lock, u32 mask,
})
#else
#define RES_CHECK_TIMEOUT(ts, ret, mask) \
- ({ (ret) = check_timeout(&(ts)); })
+ ({ (ret) = check_timeout((lock), (mask), &(ts)); })
#endif
/*
--
2.47.1
next reply other threads:[~2025-04-10 14:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-10 14:55 Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi [this message]
2025-04-10 22:02 ` [PATCH bpf v1] bpf: Use architecture provided res_smp_cond_load_acquire Alexei Starovoitov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250410145512.1876745-1-memxor@gmail.com \
--to=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=kkd@meta.com \
--cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox